Comments 1,455

Re: Random: Local Supermarket Wins Trademark Battle Against Nintendo

Chocobo_Shepherd

Yea, y'all don't understand trademark law. Which is especially clear when you use words like "patent" and "copyright" interchangeably with it. You must defend any noticed trademark or risk LOSING IT. So, challenging this store and then losing the case is the best possible outcome for the store, the sanity of the world, AND Nintendo.

All they did was legally distinguish the video game franchise and its character from the supermarket. In so doing, they get to keep their trademark — that's how it works. No more or less. Shame on anyone trying to make it into something more for the sake of some clicks (not that this article is really doing that, but you can see the outcome in the comments).

EDIT: Case in point: The Washington Nationals baseball team and Walgreens had to go to court some years ago to hash out whose stylized, swoopy W was whose. I believe a regional grocery chain (Wegmans) was also involved. No one is confusing a baseball team for a convenience or grocery store, but it's the same legal ground.

LINK: https://washingtoncitypaper.com/article/466191/the-law-of-the-letter-could-nats-curly-w-be-taken-away/

Re: Square Enix May Withhold Its Own Products If You Harrass Its Staff

Chocobo_Shepherd

@eduscxbox You are correct, on the other end, people shouldn't mix things like voicing opinions, inquiries, and criticism with harassment. Freedom of Speech (at least in America) does protect being annoying, obnoxious, and even offensive. Because those are subjective things.

If I said I thought the (I don't know) outfits in a SE game were offensive, that would not give me the right to have that game removed. But I could voice my opinion about it as often and as obnoxiously as I wanted. And everyone else would have the right to ignore me, block me or just tell me to shut up. ^_^ They wouldn't even have to be nice about it!

Of course, people should be kind in how they voice their displeasure, but it can't and shouldn't be enforced because, again, it's subjective. Policing true harassment is great; policing politeness or opinions is tyranny.

Sadly, online culture has gone off the rails at both ends of this topic.

Re: Square Enix May Withhold Its Own Products If You Harrass Its Staff

Chocobo_Shepherd

First, where is the evidence that this kind of thing is happening with any kind of predictable consistency? Where is the data that this is happening to Square Enix more than other companies? Where is the proof that Square Enix treats its own employees so well that they can start pointing the finger at their audience?

Second, a lot of these classifications are incredibly vague and one-sided. "Persistent inquiries"?? So people can't ask frequent questions.. like what? When a game is coming out? How much it will cost? Why the DLC is structured like it is?

People can't ask for apologies from SE?? What deems a request for staff reprimands being "unreasonable"?? What if the SE employee does something truly detestable to the audience member? They have immunity??

~~~

TL;DR Yea, everyone should be cool to everyone else. But this feels really defensive, flimsy, and ultimately performative.

Re: Physical Game Sales Took A Nosedive In The UK Last Year

Chocobo_Shepherd

@Steel76 That's true. I'm glad the indie space exists. And in those cases I would love them to use crowdfunding to bring them to life when possible.

Also, a lot of studios (not usually indies), need to cut back spending money on gigantic bloated games with gigantic bloated staffs that then can't afford to put that game on a 2-cent plastic disc (or a $15 plastic cartridge in Nintendo's case).

Re: Tencent Labeled A "Chinese Military Company" By US Government

Chocobo_Shepherd

I don't know how people in the comments are unable to differentiate between the US military and any military (let alone one that is potentially hostile to the united states). I know a lot of people here aren't in the US, and that's fine, but hopefully it isn't hard for anyone to realize that a country will act in its own best interests. Some would argue that's the entire point of a government, to look out for its own country and people.

Again, this is China we're talking about. If a games company had ties to the Canadian military, it would be a different story.

Re: Review: Lollipop Chainsaw RePOP (Switch) - This Choppy Remaster Of A Cult Gem Doesn't Bring Any Cheer

Chocobo_Shepherd

Poor performance throughout

I bought it on PS5. Hopefully that solves this issue.

Combat is clunky and stiff

Review says the new version controls significantly worse than the original, but doesn't say how. I'm curious of how it can be objectively worse.

RePop mode feels pointless

I actually think the stylized visuals are much more fun than gore and blood. I don't mind some gore in games, but I think I'd rather have this kind of cutesy satire.

HOWEVER, that's only for the visuals of the violence. I wouldn't want the violence to be removed or toned done. And I also wouldn't want sexual content or language context to be removed or toned down. If RePop mode alters any of that, I will play in Original Mode and just deal with the gore.

Licensed music tracks are mostly gone

That is a shame. Out of curiosity, what licensed songs are missing from the original?