Comments 2,199

Re: Reaction: A Direct That Delivered, And Shows That Switch Still Has Plenty Of Pep

Altaria_97

Agreed, this was a great Direct. I didn’t care for most of the filler third-party games but the Nintendo titles delivered.

I thought we were just going to see ports and remasters, but instead we’re getting a new Mario & Luigi game, a Mario Party that feels like a perfect blend of the N64/GC eras, a new 2D Zelda with a new concept but a traditional g structure, and our first gameplay of Metroid Prime 4 with a release year.

Oh, and throw in some good NSO games and Donkey Kong Country Returns HD.

The Switch, at least for me, is going out with a bang. I’m pretty excited for this fall’s lineup.

Re: Anniversary: Mario Golf On N64 Is Now 25 Years Old

Altaria_97

One of my favorite N64 games. Toadstool Tour is also one of my favorite GameCube games, and World Tour one of my favorite 3DS games.

Unfortunately, Super Rush is pretty far down on my list of Switch titles. It felt like an off-brand, more simplified version of the series with a live-service content drip approach.

Hopefully the next Mario Golf is more like the others, but regardless, happy birthday to one of my favorite games!

Re: Talking Point: Would You Want Quality And Performance Options For Nintendo's 'Switch 2' Games?

Altaria_97

@rjejr Title of the poll is “Given the choice between crisper visuals or a higher frame rate, which is more important to you?” Seems pretty direct to me based on what I said.

I also didn’t ever say anyone was wrong, just that the poll seemed a bit pointless due to the added option. You’re titled to your own opinion, but don’t put words that people didn’t say in their mouths and act like you’re proving them wrong.

Edit: I see now you’re referring to the article as a whole. I was only referring to the poll which only specifies two options.

Re: Talking Point: Would You Want Quality And Performance Options For Nintendo's 'Switch 2' Games?

Altaria_97

I find answers such as “as long as the game is fun, I don't care” to completely break the purpose of polls.

The topic at hand was whether crisper visuals or higher frame rates are more important, so throwing a sorta cop-out answer like that just makes it so we won’t get the most representative votes to the question at hand. Of course the game being fun is most important, but let’s stick to the main point of the topic.

Re: Soapbox: Fire Emblem’s Future May Not Be In Turn-Based Combat

Altaria_97

Nah. The combat is my favorite part of the games, with the sense of the adventure and story doing a good job of bridging it all together. A full blown social/life sim game wouldn’t interest me in the slightest.

I think Engage’s problem was the super basic story and characters. Plus it coming out in January, right after the holiday rush. Games like Awakening and Echoes (and Fates, to an extent) released at better times and had more fleshed out characters and stories. Just make another game like them, not like Engage’s “vanilla” or “first Fire Emblem” approach.

All this is to stay that I still enjoyed Engage a lot. More than Three Houses, in fact. But I can see why others didn’t like it as much or why it didn’t blow up in sales.

Re: Princess Peach: Showtime! Demo Now Available On The Switch eShop

Altaria_97

Sweet. I’ll give it a download now and will try it later today. Thanks for the heads up!

Edit: Had a some time to give it a go. It’s… alright? The resolution seems like it’s somewhere between 480p and 720p and the frame rate surprisingly stuttered on me quite a few times.

The gameplay is even more basic than Kirby and Yoshi titles. Not terrible for a “turn your brain off” kind of game but even the collectibles were mostly just given away or in super easy to find areas. And I was hoping for more set pieces or gameplay variety but it was kind of just press B to attack and that’s it.

It’s not bad but it was painfully basic, even more so than I was expecting. For now I think I’ll skip this one, which is a shame because I love the concept for the game. But hey, not every game is for me. Glad for those who enjoy it.

Re: Poll: So, Will You Be Getting Mario vs. Donkey Kong For Switch?

Altaria_97

Maybe sometime in the future but I have no plans currently. I liked the original on the GBA but it just feels like an odd game to remake, at least for the asking price. There are simply too many other games I'm currently playing through to warrant picking anything up at the moment unless it's something I'm dying to play.

I'm much more excited for Peach's Showtime, Luigi's Mansion 2, and Paper Mario TTYD.

Re: Talking Point: Which Feature From Each Smash Bros. Game Should Make A Return?

Altaria_97

Perfect content for me would be:

  • Ultimate’s style classic mode where each character has their own unique set of battles
  • An adventure mode with plentiful cutscenes like Subspace but gameplay from World of Light
  • A proper mission mode back like Melee, Brawl, and Wii U
  • Break the targets for each character + homerun contest
  • Trophies to collect, with some locked behind achievements

All this would make Smash just as good of a single player game than a multiplayer one.

Edit: A lot of people like Smash Run and I think the only issue with it was that it was tied to a handheld. So bringing that back for 4-player split-screen on a TV would be awesome, much like Kirby Air Ride’s City Trial mode.

Re: Poll: How Much Internal Storage Would Be Reasonable For 'Switch 2'?

Altaria_97

Given the system is able to output a 4K picture (not saying games will actually run at that resolution), that means games will have higher res textures, even if they’re running at 1260p or something.

Given that, and the rising size of third party titles (and Nintendo titles if they support over 1080p resolution textures)… I’d say the minimum they could get away with to avoid insane backlash is 128gb.

That said, 256gb - 500gb would be way more optimal. My guess is on 256gb with the obvious SD card expansion slot.