Narrator1

Apparently there were a handful of ideas that they wanted to do in the first game but couldn't due to time or developing constraints. Do a Lost Levels or Galaxy 2 and make a sequel out of those ideas. That and make bosses other than Bowser and Jr., and lightning strikes twice.

Looking at the text of the lawsuit, there were a handful of major things that tripped Yuzu up.

(1) Patreon. Patreon is a honey trap. They effectively monetized their emulator by locking beta builds with the newest fixes and highest compatibility behind subscription tiers to their Patreon. I imagine this, more than anything else, incurred Nintendo's wrath and opened the door to this suit, as it allowed them to successfully argue that Yuzu was raking in thousands of dollars per month off of Nintendo's IPs.

(2) Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom. They broke street date on it, effectively allowing people to pirate a game that hadn't even been released yet. (Metroid Dread, Super Mario Bros. Wonder, and Super Mario 3D World + Bowser's Fury also broke street date and were emulated by Yuzu on Day 0, yet the suit specifically mentioned Zelda.) This ripped apart the "preservation" angle that was successful in past emulator court cases.

(3) Their Discord, and the bragging thereon about scoring .xcis of pre-release games.

(4) Bunnei, the lead developer, outright admitted according to the court filing that according to Yuzu's own data telemetry, most people just downloaded pre-baked builds of games with the encryption keys baked in. In other words, by the devs' own admission, most of the people using Yuzu were pirates who didn't bother dumping their own games' encryption keys. That put a blowtorch to the premise of people legitimately buying their own games but just playing them on higher-spec machines for better frame rates and resolution and more modularity.

Hopefully, anyone who inherits Bunnei's work will be more circumspect and less overtly money hungry. Go underground. Don't use Kickstarter or Patreon or anything like that. Don't try to build forks of the emulator for platforms like the XBOX or Steam (here's looking at you, Dolphin). And keep a tight lid on social media — that means no one poking the IP holder in the eye every chance they get about how the unofficial product is just so much better and that everyone who uses the official hardware is a corporate bootlicker, etc. That never ends well.

Has no one learned nothing from the Smash Ultimate rumor cycle? The parade of guessing, half-truths, misinterpretations, and sometimes outright lies from "insiders" and "leakers"?

@LXP8 Female Byleth, the non-Luminary Dragon Quest Heroes, and Zombie/Enderman were the major missed opportunities.

@JayronAuron I'm of a mind that people should know better than to use exploits while playing modern Nintendo games in highly publicized venues with thousands of viewers like Games Done Quick.

To take another Mario example, Nintendo saw people Item Bagging during a series of Mario Kart 8 Deluxe tournament exhibitions throughout 2023, and that definitely contributed to their moving directly against it.

@outsider83 Really? You're going to mention Palworld on an article about Pokémon merchandise, that has nothing to do with any games?

And here I was wondering if they were going to throw us a curveball and do something like, say, try to cram Starfield onto the Switch, hoping enough of the Switch's massive potential userbase wouldn't mind buying into the inevitable porting disaster.

Probably off-topic, but I liked how Tekken 8 did it (at least during the beta and demos). They did a sneak peek of the final fight between Kazuya and Jin using in-engine rendering. Then they replaced it with a standard CGI opening for the actual release...

This is a hotfix for glitches like the TM for Metal Sound requiring drops that can't be collected in Scarlet or leveling up Inkay with candies under Level 30 locking out player input. 0.0.x Hotfixes generally don't fix performance issues; you leave that to more substantial title update patches.

I'll say the same thing here that I do to all these "X" slayers.
The people trying to use this game as a cattle prod to attempt to spite Nintendo/Game Freak/The Pokémon Company are doing the game a massive disservice. It ensures that the game gets an immediate rush of hype from influencers and streamers, sure, but that what happens when it drops out of the social media news cycle and the stream monsters have left? Discourse is poisoned, people leave the product in droves, and the thing it was meant to "kill" just lumbers on.
Remember Nickelodeon All-Stars Brawl, the game that came swinging out the gate with Melee-style combos and rollback Netcode that was supposed to show that lazy bum Sakurai how to make a REAL platform fighter?

Even if I don't like the game, I never sell, at least not when it's on the market. Just wait a few years, and cartridges start to command a premium in second-hand markets in this age of digital copies.

@Beetlebum91 There's the EXP Charm, which gives a permanent boost to experience points gained in battle. It's given to you as soon as you complete one round of Ogre Oustin' (win or lose) which is mandated by the story. Of course, that requires the DLC purchase, but you don't have to have beaten the base game for it.

On the topic of Trainers you have to search for and chat up yourself and instead of jumping you on sight, I like the idea. It encourages exploration and playing at your own pace, gives the player some agency. Do you want to go straight to the end? Or do you want to explore and hunt down enemy Trainers? The game even rewards you at Pokemon Centers if you go out of your way to crush enemy Trainers. Scarlet and Violet had a lot of flaws, but making non-crucial enemy Trainer Pokemon Battles optional was not one of them.

@Staatz Ironically, the base game's Gym challenge was the least engaging part of the game for me. Arven and Clavell were much more intense and memorable fights than any of the Gym leaders, while Geeta wasn't very scary as a League Champion.

Put that team to work on more Pokémon titles (loved Pokken and New Snap). Show Game Freak how it's done.

The people tracking sales numbers for Scarlet and Violet versus other generations are missing the forest for the trees. The games are now just one part of a massive multimedia empire, and the bulk of the income comes not from the games, but from the marketing and merchandise. Some games can underperform or even outright flop (like Pokémon Conquest) and the big mass media franchise that is Pokémon just keeps churning on.

Why is Game Freak still just a relatively small outfit that leases office space in Nintendo's headquarters despite being at the helm of the largest multimedia franchise in the world? Because most of that multimedia franchise money ends up in the hands of The Pokémon Company.

I feel sorry for anyone who draws Scream Tail/Iron Hands. Those are the most common Paradox Pokémon in Area Zero.

You don't strictly need both Jalapeños to win Crispin's trial. One set will do as long as they're placed onto the sandwich correctly — the one from trading is just an out in case you don't want to pay/fight for the other. But if you place both Jalapeño sets onto the sandwich and get all of the other ingredients right, you get special dialogue from him congratulating you for making it REALLY spicy. Doesn't influence anything else though — just a nice Easter egg.

Another group Embraced™.

They were really counting on that $2 billion from the Saudi PIF to keep funding their otherwise unsustainable buying spree.

I see Sega ran the numbers and found out that too many people got filtered by the story DLC. Unfortunate, but not entirely unexpected. That was a lot harder than most anything in the base game.

@Pod I'd agree with the general sentiment, but this particular boxed release ran just fine in 1.0.0. This update only really affects you if you were attempting to speedrun or artificially inflate your online Heart Point score.

@Rykdrew Since when did a 2D Mario platformer have a hard mode? I mean, besides the SMB2 for Super/Lost Levels?

I wouldn't mind a remake, but not in that CryZEN-style Unreal thing everyone seems to love. "Uncanny Valley" is too tame a word for that; it's an uncanny crater. I'd personally like a softer cel-shading style similar to what Kirby did when giving Return to Dreamland the HD treatment. It's easier on both the eyes and system specs and ages much better than trying to attempt realism.

Though if I absolutely had to choose, I'd always pick a new game over a remake.

It's entirely possible to spoil. During the Wii U Era, leakers were drip-feeding spoilers that Super Mario 3D World would have extra playable characters aside from the four shown. Biggest candidates were Yoshi, Wario and Rosalina.

Then Mario 3D World was leaked early onto the Internet and pirated, as all Nintendo first-party games are nowadays, and Rosalina being playable turned out to be true. Rosalina was not in any official advertisements until well after launch, so she was meant to be a surprise. But the cat had long since fled the bag.

@johnnyvibrant Sure, in the general sense of "they've been working on the next machine ever since the Switch's release". We knew from the beginning that the Booster Pass was going to dole out content for MK8D throughout 2022 and 2023, and that everything would be out before 2023 ended.

I'd have been in for a third pass. Not necessarily because of characters, but also because of further active development of the core game (balance changes and bugfixes). Steve is far too overtuned for the game.

It took some doing to get Pyra and Mythra.

Well after its initial Sunday restock, Amazon was periodically reopening slots on account of thwarted bots and canceled orders. I had to camp my phone for an hour and keep hitting the "Buy Now" button before I finally got one. I've been collecting the Smash line since the beginning, from Smash 4 well into Ultimate, and this is the first time since 2016 that I had to actively fight scalpers and bots to get an Amiibo.

Probably outside of the purview of the review, but I'm happy Nintendo is puncturing the "Yoshis and Shy Guys on teddy bears" meta that was developing in the wake of WaluWiggler getting nerfed. Even if some other combination will come to the forefront in its place.

@norwichred I think we're well past the point where a boycott would do anything to this game's bottom line.

@Darthmoogle There are no explicit scenes here to be censored. The remake is not an eroge, as it was released on the PS4 and Switch in Japan. Neither of these platforms would have tolerated explicit content, and Nasu specifically did not release this game on PC.

And then once the makers of the game inevitably clamp down on this nonsense, we start hearing cries about "CENSORSHIP! FREE SPEECH!" We've all been around this block before.

@samuelvictor @JohnnyMind I wouldn't hold my breath for Pac-Man. He and Taiko only got in as easter eggs because the arcade games were developed by Namco for Nintendo.

I think if anyone wants to create something that competes with Nintendo's biggest brands (Pokemon, Smash Bros., etc.), they need to keep a tight rein on their social media. Few things poison the pot like someone, official or not, mouthing off about how "THIS IS THE 'X' KILLER! WE'VE GOT WHAT NINTENDO DOESN'T HAVE! NINTENDO FANBOYS IN SHAMBLES!" Let the product's quality speak for itself.

There's an entire class of influencers and streamers whose MO is "I fell in love with this Nintendo product from the SNES/64/Gamecube era, but then I fell out of love with it, and I will now spend two hours breaking down how each and every one of the newer entries is horrible." Trying to pander to this class is a losing bet, as games like TemTem and Nickelodeon All-Star Battle have found out the hard way. They will invariably leave once the vicarious thrill of poking the biggest dog on the block in the eye fades.

In short, Nintendo needs competition. But don't directly advertise your product as Nintendo competition, as it's counterproductive.

I predict that there are going to be a lot of jaws on the floor in the next two years. Everyone and his dog has convinced themselves that the next system is just going to be "the Switch, but more powerful". It could just as easily happen that Nintendo's R&D team could look at machines like the Ayaneo and the Steam Deck, decide "The 'Switch 2' idea isn't innovative enough", and try something else entirely different.

Actually reading the financials, they predict a further decline in total revenues (not just from dedicated hardware) in 2024. I doubt they would be this pessimistic, especially during a quarterly report meant to be distributed to investors who are interested only in the numbers, if they had any new hardware lined up. We can thus safely count out any Super Switch 2/Pro/what-have-you until Q3 2024 at the absolute earliest.

The Smash Bros.-style air dodge that Mario did to snap to the ledge during the beginning of the movie when he and Luigi were running to their first customer.

@ADV I'm normally the most skeptical of leaks, but I was pretty convinced that this was a thing once non-blurry pictures started surfacing. Also, it made far more sense that Nintendo would create another OLED model for Tears of the Kingdom, as it did with Splatoon 3 and Pokémon SV, than the other rumors of this Zelda edition being the elusive "Switch 2/Pro".

@KBuckley27 True, but that doesn't really say much. Every major hardware manufacturer has a section of their R&D dedicated to working on new hardware before even the old hardware rolls onto the retail market. Sony was researching technology for the PS5 not long after the PS4's release.

The absolutely most charitable explanation for this is that they're looking for people who can crawl through the blockchain looking for infringements and ripoffs (e.g. PokéWorld, Animoon) to crush before they can falsely claim sanction by and affiliation with TPC.

That's being charitable.

You could say the devs have egg on their faces.

If Ruby/Sapphire/Emerald come to NSO, I hope there's a way to directly upload caught creatures to Bank or Home. Something like what the Virtual Console did to the 3DS ports of the first two Gens.

@IronMan30 "Also, to echo other comments, did people really expect the Covid surge to maintain when the world opened back up?"

Apparently, these stockholders did. Many of these stockholders don't even have their fingers on the pulse of the video game industry and just assumed that the line would go up in perpetuity — the myth of infinite growth.

I still collect them. I still want to do a full Smash set, but I've "cheated" by substituting certain characters (Kirby series Meta Knight and King Dedede in place of their Smash versions). It's nice that the scalpers have moved on.

@Anti-Matter There's also the fact that people complain about the graphics, performance, and quality for every single game in the series. Whether or not those complaints are warranted is not the issue; they were certainly warranted here. But past a certain point, for the general buying public, it dilutes the effectiveness of those complaints, because they've heard it all before.

The shepherd cries wolf every single generation, and when the wolf has finally arrived (the state this game shipped in), the populace just assumes the crier is acting up again.

Best kids' game, indeed. If I were a kid, "AND HERE WE ARE" would've given me nightmares. How is Kirby a kid's game? Do most kids just beat Dedede, let the credits roll, and call it a day?

@Anti-Matter If you want to be nitpicky, every Paper Mario has been developed by a third party. Intelligent Systems has never been a fully-owned subsidiary of Nintendo, just a close affiliate by choice.

That having been said, I know what you meant.

Coming from someone with experience with the Shield, the Switch felt old when it rolled off the assembly line.

That having been said, I think there's going to be a lot of broken hearts and jaws dropped to the floor in the future. All of these articles just blithely assume that Nintendo's next machine is just going to be a beefier Switch with the same form factor and perfect backward compatibility with the current crop of Switch titles. It's just as likely that someone like Miyamoto will take a look at all these new handheld devices coming out, decide "the Switch but beefier" isn't innovative enough because other people are doing it, and come up with something entirely different. Also, from a purely economic standpoint, having the consumer re-buy their games under a different form factor has proven immensely profitable despite critical backlash. Conversely, the last time Nintendo did "previous hardware, but stronger and with backward compatibility and new tech baked in", we got the Wii U and we saw how well that did.

I think it's a good thing that we're seeing the Tour stages released onto Mario Kart 8. I strongly suspect that Tour's going to wind down in the near future as Nintendo is offloading its experiments with mobile gaming, and that this is a way of preserving that work. They've already largely removed the gacha elements from Tour as is.

This isn't even the most blatant one. That one goes to "Animoon", an NFT project that basically had creatures that were literal recolors of Gen 1 Pokémon like Charmander, Bulbasaur, and Pikachu, but with random spikes added. It drummed up artificial scarcity by having the first fifteen of its NFT mint be "Legendaries" that would have guaranteed a passive income of $2,500 per month for life. (This was changed from $2,500 to royalties of proceeds from the game they were making, as if the notoriously litigious Nintendo and TPC would have even allowed such a thing.) It was also shilled by the Logan brothers, Jake and Paul.

The "best" part of it was that it falsely claimed it had a "signed NDA" (whatever that means) with The Pokémon Company, and its disclaimer mentioned Niantic, TPC, and Nintendo, but not Game Freak or Creatures, Inc. It was so obvious it was a scam, and unsurprisingly, it rug-pulled soon after launch.

@Giancarlothomaz When pressed for what platforms they were aiming for in the initial reveal, they just said "consoles". For the Japanese, unless they specify, that generally means "PS4 and Switch", with a Steam port and maybe an XBOX a few months down the road purely for the benefit of overseas fans.

The big surprise from all this is that someone made a profit off of the existence of The First Soldier. It certainly wasn't Square-Enix.