Comments 714

Re: Pokémon FireRed And LeafGreen Are Already "Best Sellers" On The Switch eShop Charts

ShadLink

@Novature The Switch screen is larger than both DS' screens combined. In size and in resolution. It could easily run DS games, or even 3DS games. And a lot of 3DS games barely used the second screen anyway, and games that did could easily be retooled in a subscreen, an overlay or a menu.

For games that had any real gameplay on the second screen.. this is more difficult indeed. But you can just stack both screens easily within the 720p screen of the Switch 1 or the 1080p screeen of the Switch 2.

Re: Pokémon FireRed And LeafGreen Are Already "Best Sellers" On The Switch eShop Charts

ShadLink

See the outcome of all the complaining, people?

Nothing. Hundreds of comments, angry video's, all amount to absolutely nothing.

Rember people, Nintendo, The Pokémon Company, any other company really. They only care about one thing: money. So selling you stuff or selling your stuff (for example Google or Meta). They are not your friends. They don't care about you. They only care that you continue to give them money. (which is why some company might change their ways)

If Pokémon games had about 100 to 10.000 sales, then sure. But these games sell millions. So even if 10.000 people are angry, they will still sell millions. You have lost your argument even before you began. The only thing you achieve is that people who generally care about the game (ie. other players) are going to be annoyed by the complaining.

Re: Poll: Will You Be Getting Pokémon FireRed Or LeafGreen On Switch?

ShadLink

I am starting to see an actual devide between Pokémon/Nintendo Fans and Pokémon/Nintendo "Fans" right now. And honestly it's time to call out all the hate some "Fans" have been outing the last few years at Pokémon and Nintendo.

I feel there is a shift growing. And being a true Fan is not defending a company, no it's about being allowed to have FUN with a game.

Re: Pokémon FireRed And LeafGreen Officially Revealed For Switch

ShadLink

@Jeronan Nintendo owns a 33% stake in Pokémon. And no this "greed" (or as I would call it: normal business sense) is nothing new for Nintendo or the Pokémon company. And yeah, just like Ubisoft and EA (for now) Nintendo is a publicy traded company. So they have only, and I repeat ONLY, one task: make more money than last year. Otherwise shareholders would leave.

Re: Pokémon FireRed And LeafGreen Officially Revealed For Switch

ShadLink

In b4 people complaining about that they aren't free on NSO and the price being $20.

Already too late..

I think they made the seperate releases simply because the NSO app wouldn't be able to work with Pokémon home which I am GUESSING that these WILL do. And the price.. yeah.. That was always going to happen.

Re: Hands On: Xenoblade Chronicles X & Mira Are Even More Magnificent On Switch 2

ShadLink

Oh no! An upgrade costs €5. I paid twice that for dinner today!
Could this have been free? Yes.
Should this have been free? Maybe.
Am I angry that they had the nerve to ask €5? No.
Did I still buy it for the price of €5? Yes. I even used some unused eShop credit.

The upgrade looks stunning on Switch 2.

In the end, like the Animal Crossing Switch 2 Edition. This is just a minor upgrade, so the price isn't too high.
You can't have everything for free.

Re: Bethesda Releases Skyrim Update 1.2 For Switch 2, Includes "60Hz Mode" And Much More

ShadLink

@brakeman90 I am talking about a certain group of people who absolutely hate everything that's not 60fps or higher. A subset of people who demand 60 fps in a slow paced game (Animal Crossing) and who compare every single game to PlayStation versions of those games (Digital Foundary for example). So yeah, PlayStation fanboys. And that is different from PlayStation fans, it's a subset of that group.

Generally people who take every bit of enjoyment out of gaming.

Re: 13 Switch Emulators Hit By Latest Wave Of Nintendo Takedowns

ShadLink

@Jokerwolf I just picked the simplest one. Other games I could've picked are: The Elder Scrolls Skyrim (recent anniversary edition), World of Warcraft (still many many expansions and classic edition released), Morrowind, ..

There are enough games that are still being sold today (new) that are over 15 years old. No reason for pirating them. At all.

And sure there are always people going to pirate, or at least try to. And sure some of them would've never bought the game. But that DOES NOT MAKE IT RIGHT. For example; I will never buy a Rolex. So by your definition I would be allowed to steal one that is 15 years old? See how stupid that claim is?