Since this review was originally published, a patch has improved one or more of the issues cited. While we unfortunately cannot revisit games on an individual basis, it should still be noted that the updated game may offer an improved experience over the one detailed below.
Skyrim. Listen, mate. We need to talk.
Back when I reviewed Skyrim's 2022 Anniversary Edition update on Switch, I gave it a 7/10 and summarised that, whilst it was amusing that Todd Howard was still signing off on versions of this game, there were enhancements enough, through some new quests and the addition of Creation Club mods (and fishing), that fans would get their money's worth, whilst newcomers were treated to a solid, stutter-free version of an epic RPG. Nice.
With a game this long in the tooth, albeit one folk seem to be unable to stop buying and playing (myself included, although I like to think I'm doing it ironically), I reckon a 'Good' score and a slap on the back for the effort would have been a healthy place to leave the relationship. But no. Oh no. Todd. He back.
You may have already clocked the score at the bottom, so let's get to why I've come down so harsh this time. It's chiefly because Bethesda's taken a game that on Switch, whilst relatively restrained in comparison to some of its fancier ports, got the job done smoothly and competently. Yes, it was 30fps, but it felt nice.
With this Switch 2 upgrade, they've decided to smash a bunch of volumetric effects and graphical enhancements into the situation, as well as upping the resolution. Admittedly, I'm no Digital Foundry boffin, but DLSS is being employed and the resolution has improved. But then why no 40fps, at the very least? Honestly, my friends, Bethesda's crapped out a terrible version of a game they've released hundreds of times already, and I do believe they've done it for Christmas.
I can't think of any other reason to release their precious in this state other than a big rush to make the holiday shelves. The moment you boot into this Switch 2 port, once you've ridden the wave of excitement that is two-second-faster loading times and a slightly better draw distance, you're immediately presented with a game that's not as good at all to play. Quickly, how do I delete and go back to my old version? Well, you'll need to delete this one entirely and redownload the older one, because they haven't even done that bit well.
It still runs at 30fps *gulp*, but now there's also genuinely awful input lag to boot. I'm talking about online-fighting-on-a-Switch-Lite bad at times. Why have they released it like this? Oh, and it's a massive 53GB download as well. That's 40+GBs to make something slightly prettier but ultimately worse, folks.
I've no doubt it'll get fixed up eventually. They may even make it 60fps down the road, and it'll be a lovely version then, especially given that mouse controls are in there now and working just fine. But we're talking about Skyrim here, a game from 2011, not Cyberpunk 2077.





Comments 138
Baffling. Did they think this would drive sales? I could understand if it was 60fps and had at least non-mod feature parity with other console versions, but this is just... sad. Extra sad since I think the original Switch port was actually quite the accomplishment and novel for its time.
Nothing but a cash grab.
@MamaSymphonia It feels like they decided to bang it out and fix it later. Shambles.
Bogus, but I'm happily playing Metroid and Star Wars Outlaws, so whatever. Plus, I'm not even a big Skyrim guy. Still, I'd love to check out an improved version on Switch 2. I assume this will be fixed eventually-if so, I'll check it out. Please keep us posted if they update it!
Good to know that I don’t need to bother with this upgrade. At least not at this point in time.
I got it for free but they have to fix this (and make it 60 fps) asap! Its a shame Bethesda
The 30fps is disappointing (but still playable)
The lack of mods is frustrating but not a deal breaker.
The input lag just makes it feel broken.
And the storage size is just a kick whilst down.
Especially with rising storage prices and more GKC's I think game developers really need to think about compression more.
The range of optimization and performance between developers is astonishing. With the Switch 2 pumping out games like Metroid Prime 4 at 1080p 120fps and then going to this, it's amazing how lazy this port upgrade really is.
I don't know what they were thinking with this "upgrade"... anyways, I'd imagine there are so many games on peoples' backlogs right now that it's probably good to pass on this one
I'm fine with 30 fps as long as it's stable, but dang, input lag is no fun. And apparently there was a cool mod feature removed as well? Good grief. Though I was already passing on this anyway since I don't have time for a massive game like Skyrim.
Can it be a free upgrade from the physical? Or is it only an upgrade for anniversary edition?
@CurryPowderKeg79 Pretty bad as a cash grab since a lot of people will get it for free...
Sold my Skyrim copy a long time ago. Finely made game, don't get me wrong, but by that point Breath of the Wild was the gold standard of open-world games and Skyrim felt a bit dated in comparison.
To be honest it wasn't a good upgrade on Switch either, basic Skyrim without Anniversary Upgrade is way better.
Put it out in a sorry state to get people talking about it, then patch it while it’s in the limelight. Seems a good way to maximize interest in an umpteenth Skyrim port, no?
Pretty terrible the input lag and watching as textures pop in. But the game is pretty in general and whatever it was free. I went in to just play test it and ended up playing for several hours lol
@Jeff2sayshi : Anniversary Edition only, I'm afraid. The Anniversary Edition is basically paid DLC for the original 2017 release, plus you have the Switch 2 Edition as further DLC (though the latter is available at no extra cost).
We got a 4/10 Skyrim port before GTA VI.
Glad that this review acknowledges the increase in resolution, graphical enhancements etc. unlike most here on Nintendo Life yesterday with some even claiming that it looked worse when that's simply not true but yeah, I'd also say that unfortunately it's poor overall currently, especially considering the input lag - fingers crossed that aspect first and foremost and this version in general will eventually be fixed (40fps might be feasible and if it is and ends up being implemented then great, but certainly not 60fps unless you want notable drops like on Steam Deck etc. as others mentioned last time)!
Good and very fair review, @PJOReilly. It's about time someone took Bethesda to task for their lazy greedy ways. Seriously, Skyrim is an iconic game at this point, and to half-arse it like this on Switch 2 which could have easily run it at 1080p/60 FPS is a scathing indictment of the idea that Bethesda has any competence left when it comes to optimization.
May I recommend playing the OG version of Skyrim on Switch 2. It looks surprisingly good and I'm pretty sure it now runs at 60 fps.
I was fine with the frame rate at 30, but input lag means ill wait until things get patched. I might still download the anniversary upgrade for the OG Switch if its on sale to try for myself. If it isn't to my liking, ill uninstall to keep space free for other things (looking at you, FFVII)
@Krambo42 Supposedly this upgrade is like the Hogwarts Legacy one in that you don't need the cartridge after purchasing the upgrade because it gives you a full digital copy of the game.
@Res462 I thought I read that while it is a separate file, it still requires the cartridge to play. I could be wrong, I don't have it myself.
@PJOReilly That seems to be the way with so many modern games now sadly. Send it out half baked and then rely on patch after patch. It just make reviewing games so much harder.
I think my main concern though is that devs might just keep chucking out these duds time after time in Switch 2.
People need to stop expecting anything serviceable from Bethesda/Microsoft.
Too bad you weren't able to throw this at them in the interview you published with the developer yesterday.
@JohnnyMind I know "on paper" isn't everything, but on paper, Switch 2 is around 10 times as powerful as Switch 1. What's the argument that it shouldn't be able to run ANY Switch game at 2 times the frame rate?
Was stunned they were asking $80 CDN for this lol.
It’s insane the ps4 version looks better, runs better, has double the framerate and uses no DLSS as a crutch to achieve all of that while being on weaker hardware.
@JohnnyMind You are saying the Switch 2 couldn't handle 60 FPS on a 2011 game? Hardware in such case is a poor excuse for bad optimization.
I am far from a snob when it comes to details like frame rates but even I will balk at this one as there is absolutely no excuse for a game this old - even with all the bells and whistles turned on - to run at 30fp/s given the hardware its running on.
@Krambo42
It's what these folks are reporting.
https://www.reddit.com/r/NintendoSwitch/comments/1pieh36/skyrim_physical_edition_to_switch_2_anniversary/
@JohnnyMind “Leave the multi-million dollar corporation alone!”
I kid!
That said, the game is over a decade old, started out on the PS3/360 and has gotten more releases than almost any non-Nintendo game ever other than Grand Theft Auto V.
This is a sloppy port and needs far more work.
I have to admit that even though I am enjoying the game I immediately noticed the input lag as soon as I started playing it. I have been adjusting to it and have found it playable enough for me but it really should be patched asap, and I was surprised to find out it was still 30fps. Somehow I doubt Bethesda provides a 60fps mode but I am hoping they do. I feel like if that was ever their intention that would have included it with this update in the first place.
Might just wait until all is fixed before I upgrade
Fine, I want it, but I'll wait till they fix all the issues and it gets a big price cut.
@shgamer It's very much capped at 30fps.
@Orpheus79V Compared to Dark Souls on Switch 2 it feels smooth to me.
@MamaSymphonia in this case raising the resolution and adding particle effects are probably what ate up the extra horsepower. Beyond general resolution particle and lighting effects tend to take up the most horsepower.
Personally I would be willing to have a game with more visual effects for lower FPS in many cases, but you are absolutely right that this was a lazy optimization job and they could have made a better version for such an old game rather it being a hardware issue
@Res462 can confirm. I’ve got Skyrim S1 physical, with the S1 Anniversary upgrade.
Had to eject the virtual card for the Anniversary dlc, then boot Skyrim, and on the main menu you get a notification saying “S2 version now available, press Y for more info”. That’ll take you to the eShop page that grants you 100% off the S2 full anniversary digital copy. It’s a meaty 53gb download. After that you can remove your S1 Skyrim cart and boot the digital S2 version.
Loyal Todd Howard/Skyrim fans will buy it, anyway.
Really a 4/10? For basically still one of the best games ever made?
Really?
REALLY??!!!
30 fps. Is not a problem in a game that is basically a walking simulator with slow combat.
Download size.. sure that could've been better. But I see them fixing that with an update within a couple of weeks.
Input lag? I haven't noticed any.
"Nothing new" Jesus Christ, it's a rerelease of an old game. Did you expect it to have new content?
So... I am going to rate this review a 0/10. You didn't even try.
The game.. 8/10. Which is my original Switch 1 versions' review. It doesn't play worse than the Switch 1 version, and looks better.
Quick look at the Nintendo Store App and this game is currently number 2 on the Nintendo Switch2 charts, behind Beyond at numero uno
@Krambo42
Nope - tested the cartridge version on Switch 1 next to the free upgrade version on Switch 2.
I like the update but I didn't pay anything extra. Which is always great. So I am quite happy
@DreadfulDragon The Switch 2 never claimed to be able to bump everything up to 60 fps automatically.
@ShadLink They reviewed this VERSION of the game and felt it deserved a much lower score. It's even mentioned how the game's bones are still great fun. This happens all the time for re-releases. If Skyrim was released on a smart refrigerator or a calculator or something, like people do with Doom, would you expect it also get at least an 8/10 score? I assume those versions would be largely unplayable. I think part of the point of this review is to give us readers an idea of what to expect from this release of the game. I appreciate it.
I saw this and thought "wow finally maybe i try Skyrim again after 30+ hours at launch on PS3"
But no, the moment I looked into it I saw it will remain a game I dont revisit. A shame, as I'd genuinely love to if it was worth it.
@MamaSymphonia Exactly because you can't automatically apply what's on paper to how games actually are in reality...
@RickStar It's not a matter of the hardware in itself, it's a matter of how a game in general and its Switch version in particular is structured, what other enhancements are included in such updates and so on - bad optimization (both when the game was made originally and in this case also ported to Switch) is absolutely included among that in general and most certainly in this very case but please, let's consider all that instead of just the release year!
@dskatter I'm not saying that, just that people could and should acknowledge both the positives and the negatives first and foremost like the review did!
Yeah sorry - this review is pretty harsh. For a Free upgrade, I ended up playing for 4hrs straight - something I haven't done in any game in a long time. I noticed some 'water bug' that Switch Up's review pointed out but it didn't happen all the time and I didn't feel any input lag at all....
It looks great now - I was able to battle on like before and the frame rate didn't bother me because I was used to the Switch 1 version. I'm sure patches will come in to tweak it but wow...
Free.
Nothing new? It's an old game and it plays fine. Mario Galaxy plays fine too but they charge through the nose... this 60pfs hard on has to stop. Yes it's nice to have but for a game that's not a FPS or an intense F-zero type racing game it's not really required for Skyrim.
Thanks a lot for this review. Though I'm disappointed. I still haven't played Skyrim and was looking forward to this opportunity, though I was definitely going to wait for a sale - ouch. But I wonder what I should do now; it sounds like maybe I should get the S1 version and upgrade it later, assuming they apply fixes. Do/can developers reduce the file size even after release? Does that memory/storage "go back" to your console?
@Smerd You realise it's not free for everybody, right..?
@Smerd Only free if you're upgrading your previously purchased Switch 1 copy.
Also, I've been irked by some of the things in the "Cons" column before, too. But I think perhaps we give them a bit too much weight. I've seen 10/10 reviews on here with an item or two in that column. I think the reviewers just offer a few thoughts in those lists; I'm not sure they necessarily have a direct effect on the score.
@Dpishere I really respect your opinion here man. I don't hold my hopes too highly for another update, but I am glad you are enjoying the game. I feel like I would be in the same mindset as you if I was playing it.
@AussieMcBucket Yup, that's because a 10/10 game is allowed to have imperfections. In other words, a game can be imperfect but still be absolutely unmissable and a testament to its genre. BotW and its uneven frame rate come to mind.
Aight, guess I dodged a bullet by not being able to upgrade for free lol. Thanks for the heads up.
Nice write up. Get ‘em PJ.
wat a lazy port and the haters cant blame the switch 2 either for it.
I bought the Anniversary version on sale a couple months ago, and started playing it again in honor of my brother (we're big ES fans). It's not bad, runs well on NS2 for the most part. I'm not expecting grandiose CP2077 work, I know it's an OLD game, but it's fun enough.
With this talk of input lag (and more importantly storage space), I may have to pass on this upgrade until they fix these issues. It was already running just fine for me. Draw distance, particle effects, etc, don't bother me much. The basics are met, looks like I remember on PS3, and runs just fine. If I want "le epic port", I'll play Witcher 3 or CP2077 again (and I am, concurrently).
This game is the physical manifestation representation of the state of the video game industry at the moment.
The FPS does not bother me(I don't pay enough attention to notice a difference honestly) but that input lag is indeed really bad.
They should be tarred and feathered!
@AussieMcBucket @Olliemar28
Yep... as stated "free upgrade". I never said free game.
The game itself isn't free so I suppose you can weigh in the original Switch 1 review which is a good port in of itself.
@Olliemar28
I'm critical of the 4 - yep. Maybe state that if you are starting brand new playing on Skyrim to look at the past review because it sounds to me you were reviewing the 'upgrade' Not the game itself. Why do I think this?
Your negatives are "nothing new" and 30fps. Those points about Input lag is clearly debatable I guess.. I can't argue that because I didn't come across any but maybe it's because of where I was in the game and it's not consistent everywhere. Hopefully a patch will fix the areas you had problems with.
And yes... a Positive part should be 'free upgrade'
So yeah.. a harsh 4 to be sure. Lets hope another port of another older game isn't judged so harshly because it offers nothing new and 30fps when the upgrade is free
To each his/her own.
**Also I understand the review is not originally yours - by 'you' i mean Nintendo Life..
@LinktotheFuture Nobody is saying that. What they're saying is that a game designed to run the Xbox 360 should not be running at 30 fp/s on considerably more powerful hardware.
What this is is a quick, cheap, lazy and inefficent port that's using the grunt of the Switch 2 to bruteforce graphical fidelity at the expense of frame rates and input lag...and even then I'm surprised they couldn't do better.
I was not expecting seeing Bethesda fanboys defending this lackluster upgrade here on Nintendo life oh well , let's see how long it takes for them to fix the issues if ever
Because of the input lag it feels 15 fps. Good job Bethesda!
@MamaSymphonia Yeah, good observations.
@Raylax Todd Howard is way past his prime time. How in earth he is still at the helm in Bethesda, beats me.
The fact they managed to somehow inflate the Anniversary Edition game size from 15-17 GB (on all other platforms) to a whopping 53GB (on Switch 2) and then also managed to make it all worse, is a huge accomplishment even for Bethesda. Yes I am both sarcastic and serious at the same time.
@Smerd What do you mean? I don't own the S1 version, so if I were to buy the S2 Skyrim, I would pay $60. And the review is for that. This isn't solely a free upgrade, that's only a bonus for owners of the S1 version with a Switch 2.
And all of these subsequent releases of Skyrim are a sort of "upgrade", since the original title was released in 2011. And for this version of the game - especially when it's being labeled and marketed as an "enhanced" version - the reviewers expect a bit more.
Everybody to the Bethesda support site to send feedback now! We want this immortal game to work in some sort of acceptable fashion. Demand 60 fps and decent latency at least.It's great game so don't let them kill it by lazy work.
And, gotta love the full price of $80CDN for this wonderful updated/upgraded version.
I own Skyrim physical on Switch but haven’t played it yet. I was gonna maybe upgrade if possible but now I think I’ll just play it as is on Switch 1
What a disgrace. Gamers deserve better than this. Heck, Skyrim itself deserves better!
@AussieMcBucket
I think it's a matter of interpretation.
We can agree it's an old game. The game is also not a bad game.
Even if we eliminate the game being out since 2011 - The Switch 1 (port) game was reviewed overall by most critics as a playable, enjoyable experience for the most part. Also the Anniversary bonus was reviewed positively. It's sold very well and loved by many blah blah.
This review is the Switch 2 "Edition". It's a patch. It's free (with a switch 1 version purchase obviously) and was reviewed way lower than I personally think it should be - given the negatives stated. I disagree with the 30fps attack and the Nothing new negatives. Input lag clearly sucks - but I couldn't agree nor disagree because my playing experience so far (over 4hrs) had none of that.
I'm very new to Skyrim - I bought it on the eshop maybe 2 years ago - on sale and have been happy. With the hours I put into it, it owes me nothing and the free upgrade is a big bonus.
I don't believe the S2 patch sucks (ie: a 4). I think some people may stay away from it because of it and it's a shame.
My advice to everyone - and it should have been in the review: Wait for the S1 version to go on sale - which was reviewed decently. It goes on sale often. Get that and enjoy it. Even playing the S1 version on the S2 has better loading times.
If you like it, download the S2 version - free -
If I didn't know anything about Skyrim... and said wow Skyrim sucks on the Switch 2 (a 4 - something to stay clearly away from for most people) I would be missing out on a decent game experience.
I feel the review didn't paint the whole picture. People conclude that this version - free or not - is unplayable - and that is simply not the case.
@DreadfulDragon My apologies, my interpretation of your comment was incorrect.
I agree, lazy port for sure.
@MattmanForever It is a lazy port, but that isn't the Switch 2's fault.
@ShadLink
"It doesn't play worse than the Switch 1 version, and looks better."
almost everyone but you is saying that it does play worse.
fwiw, they aren't reviewing the game, they are reviewing the upgrade, hence the low score. 👍
I imported my old save and I notice zero difference graphically. It runs worse than before and is now somehow more than 50Gb. Absolutely pathetic.
What on Earth are Bethesda thinking?!
This is going to drown under all the other third party software out there performing well, not to mention first party stuff. In the last week alone we’ve got Assassins Creed, Sonic Crossworlds, and Metroid Prime 4. Shovelling this onto the shelves just looks ridiculous.
I have the Anniversary Edition on PlayStation and I have a PS Portal so maybe that’s just how I should play it if I ever get around to it.
With all the releases of Skyrim, I was hoping at some point they would remake Morrowind.
I believe hugely disappointing applies to everything Switch 2 in general: prices, anti-consumer practices, first party games and third party games and, of course, Skyrim is no exception.
Shocking. No really lmao
@darkswabber I think the base PS4 version I last played was 30fps too (if I recall), but honestly it should have ran at 60fps there too. The input lag sounds really unacceptable here though, and that bloated file size. I guess must be better than where I first played the game, the infamous PS3 version, but that would be faint praise indeed.
Does not inspire confidence ahead of fallout and doom releases.
Doesn't the Switch 2 screen support up to 120hz? surely a game as old as Skyrim could be optimized nearly to that point.
Saying "I'll get it when it's updated" is enabling this anti-consumer bull. The plan is shamelessly profit off review-ignorant parents as they buy Xmas gifts for their kids. Ew.
Here are the recommanded specs to run Skyrim in High Settings on PC in 2011 :
OS: Windows XP, Vista or Windows 7
CPU: Core 2 Quad 3 GHz
RAM: 4 GB
HDD: 6 GB free disk space
Graphics: DirectX 9 compatible NVIDIA or AMD ATI video card with 1GB of RAM (Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 or higher; ATI Radeon 4890 or higher).
Sound Card: DirectX 9 Compatible
DirectX: Version 9.0c
With that beefy config, you could run the game 60FPS with most graphical enhancements and effects. 14 years ago.
Isn't this par for the course with Bethesda ports? Or is this a new low? Just for the record I'm not saying this is okay at all.
How disappointing. Hope this doesn't foreshadow the Fallout 4 release next year. I'll be sorely disappointed if that one also turns out to be a turkey.
I can handle 30fps, but having terrible input lag crossed the line. That's even before finding out that the upgrade is going from 12.8GB to 53GB with not much improvement to the overall image quality. Real sad that the Switch 1 version is more playable and smaller in game size.
The Switch 2 could easily run this game at 60fps if the developers just bothered putting some effort into this release. What a garbage release.
@Smerd It's not free though if you have the original cartridge release of Skyrim. Only if you already paid to upgrade to the anniversary edition. It's a shame they couldn't patch the original to look and run nicer instead of forcing anyone who wants to upgrade to the only available Switch 2 edition of the game to pay for an Anniversary Edition they might not want or need.
As for yet another Skyrim release. Bethesda aren't just flogging a dead horse at this point. They're positively hiring a necromancer to resurrect the dead horse from a pile of glue and hair and fvck it in the a$$.
It will make them another few million dollars and they will continue to laugh at the poor saps who they consistently take advantage of. So it goes with all things Skyrim at this point of the game.
Bethesda-Microsoft is on a roll with these sloppy releases. Starfield, Fallout 76 latest update, the horrible Fallout 4 anniversary release.
I was looking forward to playing Fallout 4 on switch 2 but I think I'm out now.
my old computer from 13 years ago runs skyrim better then this
@kmtrain83 It will look and play way better on both your PS5 and streaming it to your PS Portal.
I have both PS5 and PS Portal as well. So I already uninstalled this Anniversary Edition on my Switch 2 again.
53GB is too much precious space for me to sacrifice on my Switch 2 for this lazy broken excuse of an upgrade.
@shgamer it's capped at 30 fps and in my experience it crashes nonstop on Switch 2.
@PJOReilly
The fact that they thought that higher resolution, on some of those terrible textures, over keeping what was there and doubling the framerate was the way to go, just shoes how far that studio has fallen.
The reliance on that 20 year old engine that doesnt work in the modern day is making them a laughing stock.
Also lets not forget that this piece of ***** is £52.99 if you dont own previous versions, has skyrim ever cost more in its 14 years on sale???
@cvrator Ok, having played it some more on my Switch 2, you're right it's not 60 fps (fluid 30 fps I would say).
Crashes I haven't experienced any of so far, around 2 hours, but from my experience playing on Switch (1); don't make too many saves or it will start crashing (a memory problem I'd say).
Other than that load times are a lot faster on Switch 2 in my experience.
Bummer. It didn't look so hot on Switch so I thought this could be a good excuse to go back to it. Guess not!
I did a little testing and I believe the input lag is due to mouse controls being set to default. Setting it to off seem to help but it still feels a bit sluggish. I think it has to switch controls to analog everytime you touch the stick when turned on. This is similar to behavior on pc when switching control methods, but we can't track when the control scheme switches over because the button prompts remain the same on Switch.
I find this pretty alarming because it implies they might have just ticked a setting allowing mouse controls without developing or testing the function with the actual hardware in mind.
@Res462 I can say that's true, I have the physical edition of Skyrim and bought the Anniversary edition for $20 and now I have a full digital copy of the game on switch 2, no need to put the cartridge in to play 🎉🎉🎉
@Alex79uk but you do get a full digital copy for $20 (even if you upgrade the physical version) which is a win for me.
I cant comment on the input lag as I didnt buy it, but it looks like a step down visually on the videos which is crazy.
I dont care about the frame rate as long as its consistent, but why does it look worse to me on the s2?
Funny how the Red Dead upgrade, measured with the Skyrim one.
To everyone saying the “upgrade” is 53gb to the original 12-15, you’re missing something. 53gb is the WHOLE game.
If you have a physical copy, like I have, then it requires you to download an entirely separate game, aka the S2 version. It does NOT actually upgrade the S1 version.
It works just like Hogwarts basically, there’s an S1 version of the game and a separate S2 version. You can have both installed at once if you like.
I’m going to assume just like Hogwarts, this also applies to the digital version of Skyrim on S1.
I followed another posters guide on how to update the physical cart version, and afterwards removed everything S1 version related to free up space, chucked the cart in my bag, and can play Skyrim fully digitally now.
It’s odd to see this on switch as there haven’t been as many instances of it, but this works just like when you have a Series X or Ps5 and can choose to install a previous generation version or current gen version. The only really issue is getting your free upgrade if you have the physical cart + anniversary dlc. In which case just eject the anniversary dlc virtual cart - then boot regular Skyrim and select the S2 version now available link in the main screen.
There's no excuse to release a game this old on a new system without at least a 60 fps option. As soon as I saw 30 fps I knew this was gonna be bad
Ouch. Glad I didn't get this. I had wrongly assumed that by owning the original cartridge, that I was eligible for the "free" update. I hadn't realised that I didn't own the "anniversary edition" and nearly paid the £18 for the upgrade (or whatever price it is). Glad I held off to read the reviews.
@MattmanForever right, didn't think I was talking to them!
Faster loading is always a big plus for me. The review does not mention how it looks in handheld mode from Switch 1 to Switch 2. I only play Switch in handheld mode.
@PJOReilly what?! Bethesda?!? They would never. How very dare you sir!!
Perhaps the time has come to stop buying Skyrim.
Have they ever released a Skyrim version in this bad shape? I doubt it. Way to ruin a sweet track record.
This update was the thing I’d need to return and I was about to pull the trigger, but this review makes it an easy wait and see instead.
@molkom Sweet summer child.
At launch, "Skyrim has stopped working" was often the only quest available.
@ShadLink Personally I'd hope they'd at least fix the start new file big, but from everything I've heard they didn't. I was able to start a file when I owned a Switch 1 but the bug keeps hitting since getting and trying to play on Switch 2. It's a huge, known, game breaking bug.
I'd just hope they'd stop milking the same game so much personally, that's all.
How can a retro game run this bad on Switch 2 😂and very expensive for a retro re-release
Garbage port
I still don't know if I can upgrade my first Skyrim Switch version to the Anniversary one without having to purchase the game again.
@wizzgamer Expensive? It's free.
@The_Nintendo_Expat Personal experience, it's not worse.
@AussieMcBucket Basically they jumped to put extra hate on the Switch 2 (version) for no real reason. For the points I mentioned. Maybe then I just don't like this version of the review.
@Moroboshi876 quite sure I read on this site (another article) that it’s 17 dollars or pounds or similar to upgrade. Maybe someone can confirm here as well
the guy who voted outstanding 😂
@Potreo Well, it turns out I must have upgraded my Skyrim to the Anniversary Edition at some point anyway and forgotten about it because the full Switch 2 version is showing as free for me in the store 😆
Haha holy sh* thanks for the brutal honesty, that's what they get for releasing a terrible cash grab!
Good on you mate!
Nothing surprises me with Bethesda anymore. Given their track record over the more recent years, I do worry how Elder Scrolls 6 will turn out, if they ever get to it, but I hope they will give a brand new flagship title the effort and respect it deserves.
As for this one, hopefully they fix it.
If you have the Switch 1 game on card, you can start it up and enter the eShop by pressing "Y".
You can then get the Switch 2 version for 19,99.I suppose it's free of you have the anniversary edition.
I'm worried about Doom getting upgraded now
@MattmanForever have they?
This is a massive bummer. Thanks for the PSA: this has definitely been on my back log wish list
The Game needs a patch asap. Input Lag is the biggest issue. And performance mode should be a norm for Switch 2.
It’s really bizarre that I prefer playing the version without the update rather than the updated version on the Switch 2.
I'd kept meaning to buy the Anniversary upgrade so reading it got me a free upgrade to Switch 2 made me buy it as soon as it was announced. Downloaded it but never got round to it. Yesterday I read this mini review and got curious.
"Surely it cant be that bad' I said to myself. I'm easy to please. Don't care if something is 30fps unless its an online multiplater. I'm rarely annoyed.
The lag on this makes it borderline unplayable. It's like Skyrim but you're burried in treacle.
Bloomin' 'eck, it looks awful! And that's just from the thumbnail of the YT video!
@MamaSymphonia 10 times is a bit of a stretch. You're right the raw GPU compute of the Switch 2 really is 10 times higher (0.4 tflops vs 4 tflops).
But it's bottlenecked somewhat by the memory bandwidth and CPU, both of which are around 4 times better than the Switch.
A more realistic real world estimate would be about 6 times more powerful than the Switch.
Either way I agree, it's a LOT more powerful than the Switch, so we should see the same kind of uplift we're seeing in Nintendo's own games, the Mario and Zelda updates.
@Raffles Yeah fair. It's never as simple as a straight numbers comparison. It just feels silly that with such a dramatic leap in hardware we're getting what feels like very small improvements in some games. Although, I suppose the same thing happened going from PS3 to PS4 (many games, including Skyrim and GTAV, prioritized increased resolution over frame rate just like this, which I remember being similarly disappointing).
@MamaSymphonia As someone who loves a solid 60fps, yeah it is always disappointing when resolution/graphics are prioritised over framerate.
Consoles often follow a familiar pattern - at the start you'll get excellent framerates and image quality like Ridge Racer 7 on the PS3, running at 1080p60, and by the end of the generation developers inevitably try and push visuals as far as possible, with cutting edge (at the time) techniques, so you'll end up with fancy lighting/effects, and games running at 720p20
So far though, I've been pleasantly surprised we've been seeing the on paper specs reflected in real world performance, at least with Nintendo games. Odyssey, BOTW etc, look excellent, running at 1800p60 and 1440p60.
Hopefully 3rd parties catch up soon.
@Raffles There's hope! Red Dead Redemption on Switch 2 is fantastic, running many of the high settings effects while maintaining 60fps to boot. I'm also hoping more devs get comfortable with targeting 40fps via VRR in handheld mode, which I still think is Switch 2's underutilized "secret weapon."
I really like skyrim (I've clocked over 110 hours on this anniversary version already) but a few problems that could've been put in the game include a full 60fps, the lag (both before patches have input a almost 60fps indoors and caves etc only and lag has improve but still experience it) and a brightness setting. Some areas are too dark. Overall it's still a great game to play and still many new things to find across the vast open world but yeah some little things that could've got improved or fixed make the game a 8/10.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...