Emperor-Palpsy

Emperor-Palpsy

Put me down you numbskull! Arrgghh!

Comments 603

Re: Soapbox: Switch Is Great, But The GBA SP Was The Pinnacle Of Public Transport Gaming

Emperor-Palpsy

I remember the GBA SP being released. It was indeed a step up in some ways - the backlit screen, rechargeable battery, smaller form factor - but it was also a step back with having a smaller screen and more cramped button placement. The original GBA was perfect in this regard, it felt absolutely perfect in the hands.

I feel very fortunate to have grown up during the late Eighties/Nineties as I witnessed the progression of games consoles, and I have to admit that the GBAs' will always have a special place in my heart. It's hard to pinpoint why as the technology is so antiquated now, but I think it's partly because, pre-internet, the only way we could discuss and share information (and rumours!) about games was in-person and through magazines. Handhelds were something everyone could share and the legacy of many games was cemented by how we helped each other progress through them.

Re: Soapbox: Resident Evil Zero's Train Scenario Is Still One Of The Franchise's Best

Emperor-Palpsy

I remember Zero being quite divisive at the time. The primary complaint (which I completely agree with) was that first two-thirds of the story were different enough to be interesting, but the last act was... bewildering?

Still, I think time has been quite kind to this game. The graphics, audio and general atmosphere are top notch, and if nothing else it's still more enjoyable than 5!

Re: Random: 22 Years Ago Today The Nintendo 64DD Had More Online Features Than Switch

Emperor-Palpsy

I think NSO and the Expansion Pack are more experiments if nothing else. Nintendo knows that the way forward is to have a regular source of income through subscription models - like it or not, that's the direction the industry has moved.

But Nintendo's problem with online this generation is that it's struggled to find a value proposition, since there are both benefits and drawbacks to the previous alternative.

Virtual Console is viewed with rose-tinted glasses, yet the truth is that we were over-paying for games with darkened filters, only one save state and no backup. Have we already forgotten that you could pay £3.50 for NES Pinball? £6-8 for a SNES game? Almost £15 for the N64? I really don't want to go back to that.

The argument that were was more choice is clearly valid, but I don't believe for a second that anyone 'owned' these games. Nintendo's latest move with the 3DS and Wii U eShops are evidence of this.

NSO has a nicer interface, superior emulation, more save states and cloud backup. And although all the titles from Virtual Console aren't present, it costs approximately £1.50 a month to access a very good selection of NES and SNES titles, as well as online play. I honestly think that's undervalued.

Nintendo probably knew this and came up with Expansion Pack as a knee-jerk reaction, which has had almost the opposite effect as the value isn't quite there.

Then there's Game Vouchers, which are actually decent value for a first-party full price game (£84 minus £4 for Gold points = £40 per game). This solves the issue of digital games being more expensive, but will there ever be a Game Pass competitor?

Who knows... This is Nintendo after all!

Re: Nintendo Expands Its Switch Online SNES Service With Three More Titles

Emperor-Palpsy

The negativity in this comments section is astounding.

So once again we have no ‘big’ (that is, popular) titles for NSO. We get it - it’s already clear that Nintendo isn’t dipping into certain franchises either because of contractual issues or because said studios would rather release compilations/remasters. Who can blame them?

But to write off every new NES/SNES release with the usual “it looks boring/never heard of it/just what I wanted… not” comments, before even playing the games, is ridiculous.

They may not be the games you want, but give Nintendo credit for unearthing a host of titles that many of us (myself included) never got round to playing back in the day. And it doesn’t cost us any more - it’s still the same price, so there’s no risk.

So come on… let’s be more positive!

Re: Anniversary: The Nintendo 64 Launched 25 Years Ago Today

Emperor-Palpsy

I got mine in ‘97, the SM64 pack. It’s hard to believe now but they were already heavily discounted due to the PlayStation’s success, which everyone seemed to own. The tie-in packs were £99! By 2000, the transparent variants were £49.99 in Woolworths.

I sold my original N64, but got a new-old stock transparent model for £55 a few years ago.

Re: Mario Party Superstars Will Have You Partying Like It's 1999

Emperor-Palpsy

My guess is that this was originally planned as DLC for SMP, but they changed their mind for some reason (like because they realised they could make more money from a full standalone release).

You only have to look at what Birdo says in SMP, and the data mine that occurred a few months back with revealed DLC plans.

Re: What Are Your Favourite Switch Online SNES And NES Games? Nintendo Wants To Know

Emperor-Palpsy

I’ve enjoyed the opportunity to play games that I would never have purchased, let alone known about. I specially like the localised versions of the Japanese puzzle games on SNES.

Yes there are many missing classics, but this has more to do with the business model Nintendo chose. When I owned a SNES back in the day, most retailers only had small collections of video games available. It wasn’t like today. So I think it’s been good value overall.