cmbaum

cmbaum

mobile gaming only for this guy!

Comments 226

Re: Review: Glory Hunters (Game Boy) - A Glorious 8-Bit Throwback With Some Rough Edges

cmbaum

@2think I was very sad to see this disappear from the NA App Store. I didn’t realize that Nintendo took it down and it wasn’t the developer’s doing. Do you know why, and will there be another attempt to launch in this region?

I am 100% making this a day 1 purchase if/when it finally comes out on Switch over here! I loved the demo but would rather play on Switch vs Analogue Pocket for various reasons.

Re: Feature: Nintendo Life eShop Selects & Readers' Choice (December 2024)

cmbaum

@Solomon_Rambling not sure if you're far into the game but it definitely gets better as the story progresses. I came to appreciate the tone of this game over time, which is not nearly as dark as the first game. Agree the UI is not great and is one of the biggest issues with the game. But I love the overarching story and will happily replay it.

Re: Balatro Developer Calls Out 'PEGI' For Its "Weirdo" 18+ Rating

cmbaum

@dew12333 agree, it is good to be conservative. However decisions that lead to restricted access should be data driven and not based off of misunderstandings. I am not trying to stand up for the developer as much as the consumers who will miss out on this game, and I guess my biggest issue is that folks who don't understand it are jumping to bad conclusions.

Gambling is a serious issue and I think in a lot of areas there is a collective failure to address it. But if we are going to make an example out of something it should line up with something that actually does harm.

One thing you could accuse Balatro of (along with a ton of over games) is contributing to video game addiction. I feel the formula this game uses definitely can lead to that, and I'm not saying this in jest. I think there is a certain subcategory of games like this where it can be a real issue. But again, that's not what this discussion is about. I feel that most people are drawing false conclusions about this game just because it is based around a deck of playing cards and some terminology is the same as in poker.

By the way, casinos do have Classic Solitaire as a game, but if you released a Classic Solitaire video game it would not get a 18+ classification.

I will ask again: have you actually played the game? If not, I don't feel it's legitimate just to chalk this up to differences of opinion. I feel your takes are very uninformed no offense.

Re: Balatro Developer Calls Out 'PEGI' For Its "Weirdo" 18+ Rating

cmbaum

@dew12333 in multiple interviews Local Thunk has made clear that he initially was inspired by playing Big 2 with his fiends causally in a non-gambling context. Kind of like Hearts or Spades or other non-gambling card games. He initially started to program that game and then added in other non-gambling mechanics like the Joker system until it developed into what it is today. There are absolutely zero actual mechanics in the game that have any gambling elements whatsoever. Nor are any of the skills in the game remotely transferable to an actual gambling context (e.g. a game of poker). There are zero wagers and no "house". Moreover, the whole point is to manipulate your deck like any card roguelite game. There is no logical connection to actual gambling. By the logic being thrown out there, any video game showcasing an actual 52-card deck of playing cards should be 18+ including virtual Go Fish. Other than some of the terminology or the use of hands as basic mechanics (which by the way includes hands that don't exist in real poker such as "flush fives"), what exactly in the game encourages gambling behavior? Have you even played the game?