Comments 2,326

Re: Poll: So, Will You Be Getting Kirby Air Riders?

iLikeUrAttitude

TerribleTerabytes wrote:

The amount of people who are saying "Not Interested" is so depressing. I don't want to hear complaints about incomplete or overpriced games. This game has so much content packed into it and is complete on release. And it's damn good. But sure, go ahead and write it off. You all who answered that, lack taste.

Sometimes I feel like some of you don't even like video games if you're not willing to give games like this a shot.

I've preordered and bought digitally. If you somehow get the sense to change your minds, you can find me in City Trial.

This is one of the most overdramatic responses to people just not liking a game lol.
Once again it's not that serious.

Re: The Game Awards Nominees Announced, Donkey Kong Bananza Up For GOTY

iLikeUrAttitude

@SirLink
Yeah, I stopped taking the Game Awards seriously a long time ago, it's not a celebration of gaming it's Geoff and friends the show with ads. I think most people did after the Last of Us 2 won 7 awards in 2020, including GOTY.

Just look at the RPG category, I find it a bit jarring how Monster Hunter Wilds was the only JRPG on this list and the fact that two of those nominees were NOT received well by fans being Avowed and Outer Worlds 2.
No sight of Digimon Time Stranger, Dragon Quest 1&2 HD 2D, Trails in the Sky chapter 1, Xenoblade Chronicles X Definitive Edition and more. All of which reviewed much better than the two.

Now if you made the argument it makes sense a remake or dlc wouldn't be nominated I would agree... if Elden Ring's DLC wasn't nominated and two Fighting game collections were nominated also.... (Capcom Fighting Collection 2 & Mortal Kombat: Legacy Kollection).

Also Death Stranding 2 feels like a sneak in placement, especially since Hideo Kojima and Geoff are well known friends.

But hey it makes sense in the context of the Game Awards - Dragon Quest, Trails, etc. aren't as "big" as DK Bananza and don't generate as much "hype". So even if they are reviewed very positively I guess in Geoff's mind the average gamer is just going to go "huh?" when they're nominated.

Re: Poll: So, Will You Be Getting Kirby Air Riders?

iLikeUrAttitude

Aswannsong wrote:

No. Kirby is nintendos faygo. Cheap, nasty knock off juice that actively detracts from the real thing. It’s just a boring nothing. Fluff blowing past the window, irreverent, niche, nothing.

The fact that Nintendo allows so much coverage of a 7/10 franchise (at best), continuously, generation after generation, is mind boggling. It doesn’t sell, yet this somehow gets more attention than fzero, Metroid, Pikmin and kid Icarus?

This is the great cultural dissonance between its western and eastern wings - no one I’ve ever met plays Kirby, cares about Kirby or plans to buy Kirby. Kirby does not exist to most normal people.

Sincerely, 42 year old gamer.

I don't like kirby either but it's not that serious man lol.

Re: Digital Foundry Covers The "Disappointing Tech" In Pokémon Legends: Z-A

iLikeUrAttitude

@darylb24
Without any disrespect meant you were 100% being defensive. You were complaining about things that were never even said and arguing against people that weren't there.

The defensive part comes in where you went on a whole rant about how graphics don't matter despite no one disagreeing.
Once again it's DF's job to review games on a technical level it doesn't matter how badly the game looks or if a series was never known for graphics they're still going to review it as it's their job and it's actually helpful for people to know. Because what if I'm looking to buy a game and it's performance isn't up to par or the quality isn't up to my standards?

Just like it's fair that Pokemon ZA's looks aren't enough to diminish your enjoyment of the game it's also fair for another person to be put off with how the game looks and skip it entirely, it's valid criticism.
It is what it is.

Re: Digital Foundry Covers The "Disappointing Tech" In Pokémon Legends: Z-A

iLikeUrAttitude

It's hilarious seeing all these comments seething about Digital Foundry's review when they're just doing the same thing they always done.
It's literally their job to review games on a technical level and have been doing it for years, but for some reason people start whining when they have something to say about pokemon.

Objectively speaking the game does not look good, and that's putting it lightly. Pokemon ZA looks like it was made multiple generations ago, from the minecraft water textures that overlap each other, stale environments and every single building being a block with a JPEG slapped onto it as a window. Theres a lot more to say about it but the point is the game does not look good.

But that's fine, no one ever said that bad graphics can deter your enjoyment of a game, neither did digital foundry.
This is the same "graphics don't matter" club right? Then it shouldn't bother seeing a company just give you the technical facts.

Re: Hiroshi Yamauchi Might Feel Envious Of Switch 2's Success, Says Miyamoto

iLikeUrAttitude

@Spider-Kev Yeah they definitely used to care about their appearance at some point and had some integrity.
But it feels like after Iwatas death the soul of the company was gone.

Now Nintendo is more greedy and scummier than ever, suing smaller studios constantly, copyrighting basic game mechanics that they didn't even invent, overpriced games galore etc. etc.

Re: Nintendo's Pokémon Catching-Related Patent Has Been Rejected In Japan

iLikeUrAttitude

poyo_pie wrote:

@iLikeUrAttitude they weren't patenting the monster taming genre, this is sensationalism pushed by the Nintendo hate grifters.

They just want to target Pal World exclusively for lazily copying Pokemon designs even going as far as using models like Mewtwo Y.

They're patenting basic game mechanics that are commonly found in the monster taming genre, so yes they are. The problem is that with how vague their patents are, they can apply the to vast majority of games.

It just happens in their attempt to take down a single indie game that they somehow feel threatened by they want to risk pushing the bad industry in a terrible directin because Nintenod is a scummy company.

Also they aren't using any models from pokemon, that's a baseless rumor that has no evidence to support it and was debunked several times.

Re: Nintendo's Pokémon Catching-Related Patent Has Been Rejected In Japan

iLikeUrAttitude

Thank god, patentening basic game mechanics does nothing but harm the gaming industry and stagnate creativity.
This is even more ridiculous since Nintendo wasn't even one of the first companies to do the monster collector formula, that goes to SMT and Dragon Quest V.

Nintendo is acting like a petty patent troll right now and I hope all of their game play mechanic patents get rejected too. As well as losing the Palworld lawsuit.

It feels illegal what Nintendo is doing - modifying current patents they made (after a game launched) and filing new ones in the middle of a lawsuit.

Garbage, scummy company.

Re: Nintendo On Why The Mario Kart World Album Isn't Available For Nintendo Music

iLikeUrAttitude

There is literally no point in buying Nintendo Music when they drip feed decade old music and don't even frequently update their catalog to games that just released.
Just listen to the tracks through literally any other means.
I personally use YT music because I get to listen to a variety of music along with Nintendo tracks and other game OSTs that other people uploaded.

This service along with their online is garbage and shouldn't be supported.