Comments 76

Re: Catly Developer Says Game Does Not Use Generative AI, Blockchain Tech, Or NFTs

Nickinator

@VoidofLight I see, no worries. The game definitely looks AI‐generated—even if I can’t “put my finger” on definitive proof. 😉 Regardless, I think the success of the game will depend on the quality (or should I say lack thereof) of the end‐product. Whether it’s an AI game or a non‐AI game (that looks like AI), the end‐product has to be good for it to become a success.

Re: The Pokémon Company Releases Official Statement About Palworld

Nickinator

Regarding those criticizing the Pokémon Company as going too far for intervening once a game becomes successful, I'm a little confused how that makes the company harsher. A company always has the right to protect IPs from copyright violations, big or small. So if a company chooses to overlook the financially insignificant violations, why is that a ground for criticism? A company has a right to prevent all violations, so only focusing on the financially big ones equals less lawsuits than the Pokémon Company has the right to.

Re: Pokémon Fans Set Their Sights On Palworld's Monster Designs

Nickinator

@shoeses Mickey Mouse's original design entered the public domain this year. However, any later versions of Micky Mouse that are still owned by Disney cannot be ripped off without violating copyright. The same principle applies here: Real animals are public domain, as far as their "design" goes, but to copy the designs that Nintendo made (or make slight alterations of the designs that are only slightly distinguishable) violates copyright.

Re: Random: Chris Pratt's Mario Movie Voice Was Initially Deemed Too "Tony Soprano"

Nickinator

@GooseLoose1 I don't mind your opinion striking out mine; it all depends on what you want in a movie. I prefer films to stick to the source material, and the film was packed with connections to the games. The story was straightforward, but then again, so are the games. Again, it depends on what you're looking for to decide whether that's a good thing.

Granted, if you release a movie, and only 58% of 234 critics' reviews are positive, while the audience rating acquires a "near-perfect" score of 96% (Rotten Tomatoes), which gauge would you say better determines a movie's success?

Also, what gauge would you say could better predict how a potential audience member, like the one I replied to, might feel about the film? Of course, we can't know for sure what the user will think, but they don't know either, which is why they asked. Unless they're a film critic, which they could be, I think they'll feel the way most people do. However, we can agree to disagree on this one. 🙂

  • Page :
  • 1