Haruki_NLI

@RudyC3 It was using tech that was only two years old.

That's also what the PS4 and Xbox One did. Used tech that was already a known thing. PS5 and Series systems have avoided this by using stuff that is brand new (Within a year) but within two to three years THAT will be outdated. But the cost of using brand new is...well its new. It costs a hell of a lot more to make. It depends on the business priorities at hand.

If this is real, then being the first console to have any AI upscaling tech built into the silicon is a huge thing, given DLSS 2.0 isnt even massively adopted into PC games yet.

@gaga64 They did say in the video that nowadays being the worst version isn't much different from being the best unlike say, previous different versions between consoles in years past where one is vastly different to the other.

So in a way they did just say...yeah it doesn't matter.

Also the video made me laugh: Switch vs PS5, seems legit.

Wait.

The higher ups at SEGA tell those who work on the series to ignore their users?

Looking at the past few games that checks out...even when you consider Forces level designers were all brand new.

Given these guys openly admitted they didn't care and used fan wikis as references when writing the plots...

Yeah good. They started strong in that lighter Saturday morning cartoon vibe and then it kinda...didn't work after a few years.

Ah yes, the game EA had announced content for on other systems for past September 2020, and then announced all that content was scrapped because the player base has died.

Let's port THAT ONE to Switch.

Were people expecting coop or something?

Yeah. Sniper Elite 4 that comes out Tuesday.

@RainbowGazelle Even though the interview was with XSEED? So why would XSEED say they had to be convinced if it wasn't them who needed convincing to do the port?

@Silly_G It's more like six games now, as one of the games reported by Jeff Grubb has had it's support dropped on other platforms after it released just last year.

@Anguspuss 51 Worldwide Games only took around a year and a half it seems. Made by the same studio who made Super Mario Party in 2018.

@Robo-Knight Ah yes, removing the National Pokedex. What a bad user interface design decision.

@Yoshinator Well if Epic and Apple keep hitting heads UE4 will be wiped from Apple entirely so....yikes.

This port came at a good time.

@nessisonett So with that logic, which is quite agreeable, wouldn't the issue of third parties charging more be a non-issue then?

Interesting how the upfront cost is an issue but the likely real cost later isnt.

@Kidfunkadelic83 Yeah. Yeah you do. Crash 4 on the store page right now is £60.

I mean just over the past two years most PS4 games now are £60 and not £50. The upcoming Crash 4 is one of them.

At the price they are charging, £60 in the UK, I fully expect a strategic double dip is involved here.

To quote the famous example, FIFA is rather 3+, but Pokemon Red is 12+ on 3DS because it has the Game Corner.

They only got TLOU Remastered in 2018?

Remarkable. Let's discuss canning E3 almost 4 months before it goes up, just in case the virus is still around.

Better to do it than not I suppose.

Well this ran like ass on PS4 so this should be fun.

The French have an award for fragility...huh.

@Pudjay1 @antdickens @GravyThief This may be worth whipping out that PAL Gamecube and a selection of games, get some definitive testing done?

@antdickens Interesting. I may look into this then.

But to my recollection, this wont work with European Gamecube systems/software right? Soomething about lacking Progressive Scan?

@Lordplops What do you mean by that?

That's a nice dig at Google Stadia too.

"But the way of playing is actually not very different from before with Pokemon Bank: up until now, you have always only been able to meet Pokemon from a certain region."

But....with Pokemon Bank even if the Pokemon wasn't in a certain region....you could still use it.

So no, you havent always only been able to meet Pokemon from a certain region. That's only started with Let's Go.

@gamer89 Wanna cast that lure out to sea to catch some Cheep Cheeps mate?

@mjharper Buuuuurn

@redd214 Gonna say, I put out a tweet acknowledging that they'll change it, complete with receipts

But yes, congrats to Sony. Now about what happened to Shawn Layden….

@AlexSora89 They are having a field day with this.

Namely how NintendoLife reported this more accurately than they did. Here its the 2nd best selling home console, 4th overall.

There its just the second best selling console ever. Apparently the GameBoy and DS dont exist, as "It only has to pass the PS2"

Maybe they should sue Apple for leaking the key art and name.

That's how we knew about Chapter 2 at all.

@Trajan But did you buy the game upfront?

As the in game messages stated, no one could have theorised the formation of the Island, how interdimensional activity could form such a thing instead of break. But the Bridge must be saved, the Seven must complete their mission from within the Loop, and the Zero Point must be contained once again.

They are watching, and if They are correct, it will be the end.

So to fix the erroneous error here.

Jun Senoue was lead composer for TSR, not Tee. Tee has as many credits for the game as Hyper Potions and S.A.M.E, but Jun worked on almost all the music.

@blecch For them, as has been stated numerous times, the opportunity of these IP appearing on mobile in the hands of millions of players isn't for the money, but for the marketing.

Much like with the theme parks and upcoming movie, they want their brands to be more recognised. This is just one form of marketing for the Switch. Introduce these IP, and then people will see the Switch and their games, and some will move over. Not all, but some.

And if the mobile games make money, well some of that can be funnelled into making more mobile games, advertising more IP, more people into Switch games, rinse and repeat.

@Incoherent1 Unfortunately it IS what the public wants. They did want the £7.99 Super Mario Run. Core gamers did, the audience the game was made for, didn't.

But THIS is what they want.

That has to be some kind of record for Nintendo in Europe. Probably held up by the main continent mind.

I mean, if you try a monetisation model that core gamers like on mobile only far, far cheaper, and the mobile market rejects it, what's the next step?

Do what that market responds to.

Remember at this point Nintendo has never had a game you buy upfront with microtransactions.

This is what that ecosystem demands. They tried the traditional method, I mean it was £7.99, and mobile players said no.

But they'll spend £40 in one go for a character.

That's just how it is. Can't blame them for appealing to the market they want to reach.

"Doesn't justify the price"

Y'all know price is determined by demand right? If the market is willing and able to pay a price, said price will be set.

If not, the price falls.

Hell look at the pre owned market, Nintendo games there still cost loads? Why? People are willing to buy at that price. And that's a market Nintendo has no involvement in.

You'll want to update that the original case has been confirmed as a defective launch unit and not drift as we know it.

Y'all jumping the gun

It's NOT what we think?

Dammit.

@frabbit Nope. I remember when...I think it was MK8D got number 1, it was noted it was the first for Nintendo since Pokemon White.

Also, Link's Awakening is only the third ever UK number 1 for Zelda, the others being Ocarina of Time and Wind Waker.

@ShaiHulud Ni No Kuni Remastered charted lower than the Switch version. I havent seen much if any marketing outside of Nintendo DIrects so that may be why.

But god on Zelda! When do we get to the point where Switch has more UK #1s than all other Nintendo systems combined? Especially the 3DS and Wii U didn't manage any, and the last one before Switch was a DS game in 2011.

@Kalmaro E3 for the UK shilled for by this site because their parent company runs it

@clvr You raise an excellent point. This is unusual and unique for a Pokemon to completely change type in a single evolution.

But then again once upon a time form changes like Deoxys didn't exist. Then they gave normal non-legendary Pokemon form changes.

Then we also never had a Fairy type. We never had a legendary that could evolve before, but Cosmog happened. Ultra Beasts we're thought to be unable to evolve. Then Poipole happened.

Adding Pokemon mid-generation? Unheard of. Then it happened. A mythical Pokemon that can evolve? Surely not right? Meltan exists now.

A move that has two types? It exists. A pure Flying type exists.

Just because it hasn't happened doesn't mean it won't. Ever since Gen 3 the impossible has been happening. And now it seems evolutions to totally different types are possible. Just like evolving legendaries and mid generation additions.

@RupeeClock I feel like stuff like Obstagoon is a one off. Like they wanted to do an evolution for Linoone and tied it specifically to a regional variant.

Whereas this...yeah Farfetch'd just evolves now. Now HOW it evolves remains to be seen but it's implied to be level up

@RupeeClock I dont think its right stating that Sirfetch'd is a Galarian evolution.

Yes, Obstagoon is, but its specifically stated to only evolve from Galarian Linoone, thats why.

This evolves from any Farfetch'd. Much like how previous generations would introduce evolutions to old Pokemon such as Eevee, Tangela, Magmar, Yanma, Lickitung….

Those weren't "Insert region here" exclusive. They were just introduced then. Unless stated that Sirfetch'd can evolve from Farfetch'd found in Galar exclusively, then this is just a normal evolution.

No additional downloads probably just means that in addition to a cart there is now download.

Or it could mean you get a download code for a game, with no additional downloads after.

Still this doesn't apply to Europe.

@GrailUK Yeah that's true.

To imply Xbox isn't getting anything from this is insane though.

They get more Xbox Live users, which they live touting

All developers on a platform get majority revenue split of game sales, so Nintendo isn't even making that much compared to Xbox on the games they port.

And remember Nintendo would have had to pay MICROSOFT for Banjo. Not the other way around.

Putting Nintendo games on Xbox would benefit Nintendo more than Microsoft, not the other way around.

@Razer Xbox us already getting stuff back though.

Users for Xbox Live via Minecraft.
As publisher of Ori, Minecraft, and Cuphead they get the Lions share of sales revenue as does any developer. Nintendo takes their minority cut, Xbox gets the rest as publisher. Its believed to be around 70%.
They also get the likely large lump sum for licensing of Banjo in Smash, as Nintendo will have had to pay them for that, and it could even extend to a cut of the DLC Revenue too equivalent to what Banjo is worth as a stand alone download.

Xbox is getting stuff back. They are getting a boatload of cash.

All Nintendo is getting is a little extra cash and a handful of games.