Turbo857

Turbo857

gamer, podcaster, lyricist, vlogger

Comments 944

Re: Feature: We Grade the Various Nintendo Switch Launch Complaints from the Web

Turbo857

@TreasureFan

I hear ya and agree = Motion controls are fine when done right (I do not deny that there have been duds). I remember Sin and Punishment for the Wii (loved it; and would never play a motion controlless sequel). But I couldn't care less about the smartphone gaming preferences of "casual" gamers. I'm an inclusive "sophisticated" gamer with broad tastes. My main point has always been = there is nothing wrong with a company including motion control tech in their controllers since "some" gamers do in fact like and prefer them. If some people think this tech unnecessarily bloats the price of Switch controllers... save your money and stick with playing the 3DS. That's all

Re: Feature: We Grade the Various Nintendo Switch Launch Complaints from the Web

Turbo857

@Yorumi
"You're not bothering to read what I said. You seem to have entirely missed what I said about the gyro being superior to pointer controls"

Uh no... I actually agree with that statement so I didn't feel the need to comment on a point I agree with. However, gyro and motion controls are synonymous which is distorting your argument a bit.

"The sales of the wii are entirely irrelevant, especially in the face of the wiiU which had all those things and people didn't touch it."

The Switch is a true evolution of the Wii and Wii U. The Wii U had a lot more problems with its design that wasn't a factor with the Wii. One of those was not including a nunchuck/Remote out the box.

"Furthermore you make a projection fallacy assuming because you like something one way everyone does. = oh man, false and hypocritical.

In my defense of motion controls, I usually acknowledge they are not everyone's cup of tea. I assume that because I like them = "some" people do as well. Your stance against motion controls includes the assumption that "nobody" likes them. You should try reading your statements before posting.

"If motion controls were such a game changer why are they being dropped like a hot potato?" = bias. There's this thing called VR gaming and... many of these devices feature motion controlled games and accessories. There's also a game called ARMS that looks like it's very motion control heavy too ☝🏽 MARIO Kart 8, Fast RMx feature motion. Sooooo, who's dropping what now?

"Well other than a gyro they basically died with the wii."

I'm not gonna defend "waggle" since its implementation was mostly used as a substitute for the Wii remotes lack of buttons.

Re: Feature: We Grade the Various Nintendo Switch Launch Complaints from the Web

Turbo857

@Yorumi
Ok, Wii U was a failure. The Gamepad sometimes provided minor but useful gameplay conveniences but it was not a game changer. The Wii remote = was a game changer.

Dude, you and I have argued about motion controls before so you should know my response. #1. Regarding motion controls - 100 million Wii consumers would disagree with you. How are you going to classify Nintendo's most successful home console as a failure?

Motion controls didn't improve anything? I exclusively play Mario kart with motion controls. I prefer Metroid Prime and Punch-Out with a nunchuck-remote setup. WarioWare Smooth Moves is my favorite all time Wario ware game and I wish Breath of the Wild feature 1:1 sword control (despite the fact the game is a master piece). Resident Evil 4 on the Wii is its definitive version and I think the world would be a better place is all 1st/3rd person shooters had a motion controlled gyro option. And I'm sure I'm not alone.

So please, I know you hate motion controls (and that's fine) but stop acting like nobody else likes or even prefers them in some instances or in some game genres.

Re: Feature: We Grade the Various Nintendo Switch Launch Complaints from the Web

Turbo857

@Yorumi

"Most of it is going to be used in gimmick games or will have to be forced on players to make them use it." When you have to force something it's a bad idea." = Baseless speculation.

Neither you nor I know what games Nintendo is developing that will take advantage of this new tech. Not every game will utilize this tech so if you choose not to buy into it, that remains your choice. Noone is forcing anything.

"That doesn't mean they need to go with a controller with only buttons but really do you think the camera on the joycons is ever going to be used in a non-gimmick way?"

You and I do not work at Nintendo so again = baseless speculation. This is new tech never seen or experienced before in a game controller. So you should avoid using finite reasoning to predict the usage of something which could have infinite possibilities.

Re: Feature: We Grade the Various Nintendo Switch Launch Complaints from the Web

Turbo857

I think the web browser absence complaint on the Switch is non-valid. If people don't own already own any smart phone than portable access to the net is not a priority for them.

Left joy-con de-syncing and no wireless bluetooth headphone support are indeed bummers and should be thoroughly addressed (former sooner than the latter).

Battery issue is non-valid. It's using a modern battery and it's pushing games more taxing than the Wii U. Of course it'd be awesome to have a more powerful battery, but at this stage in modern tech it's fine.

As far as the dock scratching.... I can't speak for Switch packaging outside the US but in the US... this is certainly a non-issue. If you're scratching your Switch screen with the dock, you shouldn't own one.

Re: Opening Sales for Nintendo Switch in North America Set a New High

Turbo857

@JaxonH

Agreed. It performs very well with the features it has so far.

One thing that impresses me about the system is how fast you can get to and start up a game. My brother complains all the time on how he wishes he can just turn on a console and start a game quickly. All these mandatory hardware and software updates on other consoles for this gen can make starting a game a hassle. Switch gets back to basics.

Selecting the game first, then the user = genius!

Re: Guide: Nintendo Switch Dock Scratching Your Screen? Try This DIY Fix

Turbo857

@Einherjar

"While the dock does offer enough wiggle room, the design philosophy of everyday-use objects should always be to avoid as many sources of damage possible."

I agree with that general philosophy. And from @NEStalgia's comment, the precautions you're talking about were already addressed before release. So, due to this revelation, I have to disagree with your underlying complaint as it clearly doesn't apply here.

Re: Guide: Nintendo Switch Dock Scratching Your Screen? Try This DIY Fix

Turbo857

@Tsusasi

My comparison was written to illustrate that regardless of a product's creator's best intentions they can never prepare for the stupidity of a good portion of their potential customers.

It's very easy to avoid scratching your Switch screen on the dock. Like you really have to try to scratch your screen with the dock. So much so I do not understand why this is even a news article.

Re: Guide: Nintendo Switch Dock Scratching Your Screen? Try This DIY Fix

Turbo857

@Tarvaax @Tsusasi @Einherjar

There is no design flaw with the Switch dock. This is simply people incorrectly inserting the console into the dock. For those who own the console, you can clearly see that their is sufficient space between the console screen and the inside of the dock. If people are scratching their screens on the dock, the fault solely lies with them. Just like with those people who broke their TVs for unnecessarily over exaggerating their movements while using a Wii remote.

Re: Hardware Review: Nintendo Switch Pro Controller

Turbo857

@akaDv8R

I do actually and I use my laptop and capture card when needed (which'll be used to stream Switch until it features a Twitch app). But nothing beats the convenience of using the Twitch app from a console itself imo. Since Xbone and PS4 feature it, it saves the trouble of using an additional device to stream and record.

Re: Hardware Review: Nintendo Switch Pro Controller

Turbo857

@NEStalgia

Yeah, I understand latency being a reason why the Switch doesn't support bluetooth headsets. But including a share button in Switch controllers that will eventually enable streaming to Twitch etc. without at least including a headphone jack on these controllers is a strange omission.

I'm still excited for the Switch regardless but they should address this issue pretty soon.

Re: Hardware Review: Nintendo Switch Pro Controller

Turbo857

@SLIGEACH_EIRE

Agreed. As a frequent streamer and video uploader, the lack of a headphone jack + the Switch not supporting bluetooth headsets worries me a little.

I'd like to hear how this phone app will work with voice chat and commentary.

Re: Virtual Console Will Not Be Ready For Nintendo Switch Launch

Turbo857

@PlywoodStick

Point is we all know Virtual Console is coming... If Nintendo said they weren't doing it at all for the Switch, my voice would be among the complainers. It's a good feature afterall.

But as far being Day 1 available, its absence isn't painful. Also, Xbox 360 didn't support Xbox games out-the-box. That gradually came later and didn't support all games in the Xbox catalogue.

Re: Virtual Console Will Not Be Ready For Nintendo Switch Launch

Turbo857

Couldn't care less about the Virtual Console not being available at launch. I can play Megaman 2 on my Wii U if I care that much. The whole purpose of purchasing new hardware is to play "new" games not immediate access to old games available for older consoles.

It'll be a nice addition when it's good and ready it's time to launch it.

Re: Bill Trinen on the Addition of DLC to The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Turbo857

I enjoyed Ninty's DLC pricing with Mario Kart and Smash Bros. I've purchased Skyrim and Oblivion DLC, Batman Arkham game DLC and I've never felt ripped off.

Most of the time you get what you pay for. As long as ya get a full game for $59.99 then what you pay for DLC afterwards is on you. Making these huge open worlds that only a handle of players get 100% on anyways = a lotta wasted programming. I got no problem if developers want to get more mileage by offering DLC packs to serve as additional incentives to revisit and explore their huge extravagant worlds.

Re: Poll: Does Nintendo Switch Need Streaming Apps and a Web Browser, Or Is It All About Games?

Turbo857

A web browser on a console these days is pointless so if Switch never gets one, I don't think it'll be missed.

However, at some point in the future Switch should at least get Twitch, Hulu, and Netflix.

HBOgo, YouTube, and Crunchyroll would be appreciated but aren't mandatory imo. And I definitely do not think the Switch should've delayed launching until streaming apps were available on the system.

Re: Kimishima Outlines Nintendo's Continued Attention on VR and Portable System Ideas

Turbo857

@XCWarrior

The casual could simply chose not to use a Joy-con by itself. They are simply there for convenience not practicality.

If you offer a version of Switch that doesn't include Joy-cons you begin to fracture and marginalize the fan base. So developers who made games with motion controls or prioritizes HD Rumble for Switch prior to the debut of a motion control-less Switch can't sell their game to customers who buy the latter version.

It ain't good business sense. And you can fit Switch in a pocket... ya just gotta put your joy-cons in another.

Re: Tatsumi Kimishima Expects Nintendo Switch To Sell "About As Well" As The Wii

Turbo857

@gaga64

Bit late with my reply but well said. I agree with your points in regards to the Switch's hardware features not immediately impacting game design (or gameplay) to the degree we saw with the Wii (especially when we look at first year releases for the Switch).

But the Switch's Joy-con uses a more sophisticated technology for motion controls compared to the Wii Remote and also have HD Rumble. It remains to be seen but I have a feeling the tech in those little controllers will eventually impact gameplay in revolutionary ways in the future.

Re: Review: Fire Emblem Heroes (Mobile)

Turbo857

@rushiosan

"To be honest, even the recent FE titles can't match the level of quality and engaging gameplay that the very first FF Tactics on PSOne built."

Oh man. Now, I loved FF Tactics for the POne when it came out. It's very addicting and awesome but I'll take an FE over a FF tactics any day of the week.

Battles move at a much slower pace in FF Tactics, you control a smaller army and the battle animations are much simpler. And that map floating in space... not a fan.

Re: Capcom Has No Plans To Infect The Nintendo Switch With Resident Evil "At The Moment"

Turbo857

@impurekind

"Is that seriously the kind of scenario that would sound healthy to you for Switch?"

Nope, that doesn't sound healthy. But, I don't agree that Switch's launch is mirroring the 3DS's. You are forgetting the one key piece that was missing from the 3DS launch, that should be apart of every console launch = It had zero killer apps. There was not one single must own game available when 3DS launched. The Switch is launching with Zelda. You and other pessimists are seriously underestimating how huge that is. The last time Nintendo launched a Zelda, that console was a success.

Coming off the Wii U, I understand Switch skepticism. Traditionally when consoles launch regardless of the quantity or quality of games available, some people are gonna buy first day and some are gonna sit and wait. Regardless of which one of those camps you fall in... this thing is gonna be a hit and it will receive substantial 3rd party support.

Re: Capcom Has No Plans To Infect The Nintendo Switch With Resident Evil "At The Moment"

Turbo857

@impurekind

"Wii U launched with 30 games"

And... the 3DS launched with a mere 8 titles. It's sitting at 60 million units sold today. Apparantly, launch title quantity isn't correlated with, nor guarantee a console's success.

"The Switch, so far, isn't leaving me confident at all that it's going to be any better than Wii U in terms of the big AAA third party support going forward"

When the Switch sells, third parties will increase their support. The Switch is launching with 7 games so far - and one of them is the biggest most beautiful Zelda game Nintendo has ever made. A Zelda game that you can play anywhere. The 3DS started turning around after Ocarina of Time 3D came to the system. And due to the Switch's portability alone, there's no reason why it won't eventually achieve 3DSlike numbers. If you drop the dock, you can sell it for $199. It's virtually built to be a success.

Re: Talking Point: Is the Nintendo Switch a Handheld or Console? Does it Matter?

Turbo857

@gatorboi352

"And this right here is exactly why I do not believe Switch will ever be a mainstream success... Switch is neither of the two above referenced markets, and therefore has dug itself out a niche 'in-between' market instead."

So, you choose to see the Switch as a potential failure because it's carving its own market. What prevents you from viewing the Switch as "a bridge" between both markets therefore baring the potential to attract customers who usually just remain in one of those markets?