Comments 1,099

Re: Xbox Reiterates Its Support For Switch 2

AussieMcBucket

This looks very pretty. I'd play it again. I remember completing the co-op campaign with my friend in high school. Though it's too bad there's no multiplayer. But that's okay if there's some other Halo multiplayer that we get.

Re: Feature: "I've Been Brought Up By Final Fantasy" - Naoki Hamaguchi On Bringing The FFVII Remake Trilogy To Switch 2

AussieMcBucket

I don't mean this to sound like an attack if it does, but perhaps we should stop using the "miracle port" label. I understand that it's attention-grabbing and makes one think, "Wow, it must be very good and comparable to the other console versions", but it also perpetuates some negative connotations. I know the Switch 2 is technologically less "strong" than the other current-gen consoles, but it has taken dramatic leaps from the original Switch. I have no knowledge of game development or technical expertise; this is merely an observation. It seems like S2 can handle a lot of current-gen games, unless I'm just being optimistic. I feel like saying a port is a "miracle" gives the consistent impression that this device is punching above its weight and that surely one more title will be the straw that broke the camel's back, as it were. S2 only launched a few months ago. Maybe we should give it time to just exist and flourish. I'd like it to stay relevant with currently developed titles for a long while yet. There's so much negativity around it, but I think we should all enjoy it. Tuppence deposited.

Re: Review: Pokémon Legends: Z-A - Nintendo Switch 2 Edition - Stellar Battles, But A Step Down From Arceus

AussieMcBucket

They deleted their comment it seems, but I agree with the other sentiments. I feel like the point of that bit in the review was to give the reader an idea of where the reviewer is coming from. Like, "I play loads of RPGs, and this one's combat system is [fantastic/poor]." Or, "I love Pokémon, but I've never cared much for the combat system. Until now." It gives you an idea of how you might feel about the game if you're a similar gamer.
Reviews are essentially recommendations, one way or the other - play this, don't play this, maybe try it, etc. Unless we think computers should review things on a strict, if/then point-based system where it makes sure boxes are checked:
Does it have graphics? ✅️
Are the graphics 1080p? ✅️
Is the game 20+ hours? ✅️

I mean, I'm not sure complete objectivity would help readers to decide on a purchase. I really appreciate the reviews where, for instance, the reviewer says something like, "Even if you don't like RPGs, I urge you to give it a try."