Comments 191

Re: Turns Out Super Sonic Was Almost In The Sonic Movie, But "It Didn't Make Sense Just Yet"

ToonStuff

@KingBowser86 In the novelization, Sonic's powers are described as "Chaos-like", an obvious allusion to the emeralds. My theory is that Sonic got his powers from an emerald, more specifically the Master Emerald, since the Echidna tribe exists on Sonic's homeworld, and would explain his overwhelming power (probably just a "chosen one" situation). This could also explain how Sonic is able to use the emeralds to transform in the first place, since the Master Emerald is "the controller" of the emeralds and Sonic has it's powers.

Re: Yacht Club Games Is "Absolutely" Considering A Shovel Knight Sequel

ToonStuff

I could see a more Sonic Adventure-like 3D Platformer working better for Shovel Knight, rather than a Super Mario 64 inspired one. If they were gonna keep the pogo mechanic, I could see it being pretty hard to utilize effectively in a 3D space and would be hard to land, so turning it more into a Homing Attack-like move would make sense to me.

No matter what direction they take a sequel, it's probably gonna be great.

Re: Video: PS4's Dreams Is Being Flooded With Awesome Super Mario Games

ToonStuff

I doubt any companies will (or can) step in and take down stuff on Dreams, since it is user-generated. Honestly, some companies are probably happy with the content being made, since it could draw some attention to their brands and franchises. It's been a ton of fun to explore and play, and I've found a lot of gems and a lot of hilarious hot garbage.

Re: Sakurai Understands There Are Too Many Fire Emblem Reps In Smash, Says It's Time To "Move On"

ToonStuff

@Paraka In the end, Three Houses still succeeded, selling better than most FE’s without Smash’s help. That’s pretty much the entire point of my comment, that Fire Emblem doesn’t need Smash to succeed anymore.

When it comes to the DLC itself though, I would say that it failed in more ways than it succeeded. Nintendo is obviously still making money off the DLC sales, but for Three Houses sales to remain the same proves one of the points I made in my comment. I said that Nintendo advertising Three Houses to the Smash fanbase, a large portion of which has grown tired of FE characters in Smash, is a fruitless endeavor. Many Smash fans have either already played Three Houses (like myself) or have grown so tired of FE reps that they don’t even want to bother with playing the actual games. If the game doesn’t sell more because of the marketing, then it failed. There is no reason to continue advertising to a base that either already plays the games or just outright refuses to play them no matter what.

Re: Sakurai Understands There Are Too Many Fire Emblem Reps In Smash, Says It's Time To "Move On"

ToonStuff

As been stated previously by other comments, Fire Emblem has a lot of characters in it’s games. Because of that it makes sense for there to be a bunch in order to make sure that every fan can have that character from whatever game they like the most.

My issue lies more in the marketing department. It’s common knowledge that Nintendo added in Corrin in Smash 4 for marketing with Fates. This makes sense, since Nintendo and Intelligent Systems probably didn’t want to have another potentially series ending disaster like they would’ve had with Awakening if it sold poorly. However, for Byleth, it makes significantly less sense to try and market Three Houses, a game that had come out 6 months prior and was the highest selling FE in America and one of the fastest selling in the series. Three Houses was already popular, Nintendo didn’t need to market it to the one group of people who they knew would react negatively to it. This isn’t to mention that FE Heroes is by far Nintendo’s mobile game that has yielded the highest profit, unless you count Pokémon GO.

There’s no reason for Nintendo to baby Fire Emblem anymore. It’s found it’s audience, it’s made it’s money, Three Houses even won the Player’s Choice for Game of the Year last year at the Game Awards. Nintendo shouldn’t treat it as a tiny series that they need to advertise for in Smash to get an extra 3 people to buy a copy of the latest game. There are so many other smaller game series that Nintendo owns that they could advertise for with DLC. Games like Xenoblade, The Wonderful 101, or whatever else they have cooking up for us over the next couple of years. But Nintendo keeps showing off Fire Emblem for no real reason. Heck, their constant advertising of Fire Emblem in Smash has probably created far more opposition to the series than it has interest in it.

That doesn’t mean I object to putting FE characters into Smash, but I think that their place should be earned like so many other series’ characters have been.