Comments 700

Re: Nintendo's Recent Legal Action Against ROM-Sharing Sites Scares Major Player Into Removing Downloads

Skunkfish

@Crono1973 But would they sell more or less old titles if ROMs became completely unavailable tomorrow? You'd be a fool to say less

And let's combine the timing of that ROM removal with the launch of a new paid service featuring downloads of their old titles. Are you saying that it wouldn't be more appealing to customers if the games they were getting were ONLY available on that service?

All of the above is why ROMs are harmful to Nintendo.

And you want proof? In my teens I spent hundreds of hours playing SNES, Gameboy and N64 ROMs and didn't pay a penny for them. How did that not harm Nintendo's sales?

Re: Nintendo's Recent Legal Action Against ROM-Sharing Sites Scares Major Player Into Removing Downloads

Skunkfish

@Crono1973 Are you saying that it doesn't, or has no potential to damage sales?

Because that's what Nintendo are protecting here, the bottom line.

You could argue that many of the games are no longer and will not be available again. But if all of those old games are deemed worthless, does that increase or decrease the perceived value of their new games?

If they made Mario Karts 1-7 are available for free, would people be happy paying $50 for 8?

And don't forget, Nintendo are well aware that the only resource scarcer that players money is players time. If people are enjoying full access to their entire back catalogue, where is the time to be enjoying their new games?

I, like many others, can only dedicate a few hours a week to playing video games. That's one of the reasons Nintendo never swamp us with all the old titles at once, because greater revenue per minute of playing time can be derived from new, full price titles.

Hence, the trickle of VC titles, intended to supplement, not cannibalise their main revenue streams. Nintendo is all about pacing (not that it always gets this right!)

Re: Nintendo's Recent Legal Action Against ROM-Sharing Sites Scares Major Player Into Removing Downloads

Skunkfish

@Crono1973 And they'll no doubt release it again and again when the time suits, because it's easy for them to do so and people will buy it.

Mother 3 is a niche title, that had no English translation been done previously would probably sell pretty well. I think it would still sell pretty well, but you could understand Nintendo's doubts. And I don't think translating these games is straight forward (you could argue it's been done already, but I don't think Nintendo would use the fan translation, it's like losing their moral high ground)

Re: Nintendo's Recent Legal Action Against ROM-Sharing Sites Scares Major Player Into Removing Downloads

Skunkfish

@Crono1973 Yes, I agree - Nintendo chose not support Gamecube games. A bad decision!

EDIT: Although I think the reason they dropped physical support is due to the cost difference in the drive for supporting the smaller disc format (very few slot loading blu-ray drives support that size, if any did in 2012).

I suspect they gave some consideration to making Gamecube games available for download but decided against it for whatever reason...

Re: Nintendo's Recent Legal Action Against ROM-Sharing Sites Scares Major Player Into Removing Downloads

Skunkfish

@carlos82 Nvidia Shield's CPU is clocked at ~1.9GHz, Switch's at only ~1GHz. The bottleneck in the emulation would be the CPU emulation which is very CPU intensive (GPU is less intensive, as it would wrap graphic calls to the Switch GPU with not a huge CPU overhead).

There were some slight frame drops on the Shield emulation, if as I suspect this is due to a CPU bottleneck, this would be significantly worse on Switch.

Re: Nintendo's Recent Legal Action Against ROM-Sharing Sites Scares Major Player Into Removing Downloads

Skunkfish

@lemonjellydude From what I read, Nintendo issued a cease and desist to emuparadise last year, at which point they removed their first-party Nintendo ROMs.

I don't believe Nintendo has taken any action against them since, they're just worried because of Nintendo's litigation against the other ROM sites (who presumably ignored their cease and desist notices).