Comments 530

Re: Quest Forge: By Order Of Kings Mixes Zelda And Secret Of Mana, But You'll Need A NES To Play It

That_Guy_from_Faxana

@MIDP
About e-shop, it´s very much a technical aspect too. The NES is programmed in a completely different language than modern consoles. Nintendo emulates their old games on Virtual Console, but "new retro games" released on e-shop need to be programmed for modern pc´s/ consoles. Basically, the whole game would need to be reprogrammed in Unity.

And yeah, it´s both a costly and difficult process to get your release cleared on E-shop.

If the developer interests you, do check out nintendolifes review of last years release: https://www.nintendolife.com/reviews/wiiu-eshop/ittle_dew

Re: Quest Forge: By Order Of Kings Mixes Zelda And Secret Of Mana, But You'll Need A NES To Play It

That_Guy_from_Faxana

@MIDP
This game is developed as a tribute to the old NES-format, not as an attempt to earn big money. It´s pretty cool to release games for dead formats. Quest Forge:By Order of Kings was developed on free time, so no studio will go under because of this

Ludosity is developing Ittle Dew 2 for a bigger audience. Quest Forge is a fun side project for a niche audience (like me).

Also, there is a big difference between an unofficial homebrew release like this and a E-shop. For a release on Nintendos official channels you need clearance from Nintendo. This is not an official Nintendo product, but it works on PAL and NTSC-NES.

Re: Quest Forge: By Order Of Kings Mixes Zelda And Secret Of Mana, But You'll Need A NES To Play It

That_Guy_from_Faxana

My brother did the graphics for this one, so I can spread some light on the project.

@ZeroZX-Dev
The game should be compared with Y´s, combat is resolved by walking into enemies.

@Captain_Gonru
Quest Forge: By Order of Kings is developed on spare time exclusively for the NES. Ludosity were offered by Piko Interactive to release a NES game on cartrige and took the opportunity. The game will most certainly remain a NES exclusive. (However, the prequel was indeed developed for fun on the Atari 2600 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGavPVTDrws)

Re: Pachter: Nintendo Has Lost Its "Mojo"

That_Guy_from_Faxana

There´s nothing controversial about his statement. With less than 4 million consoles sold since release things look dark. And with new consoles released this winter, it doesn´t look bright.

1985 is a strange comparation though, since Nintendo owned the market in the NES days.

Re: Retro Studios Working on "One Major Project at a Time"

That_Guy_from_Faxana

Well, developing one game at a time is a good thing. When Retro Studios were formed they tried developing two games at the same time as Metroid Prime, both had to be cancelled.

I´m not really longing for a new DK yet, there are many good plattformers for Nintendo systems already. Hope it´s good though. Maybe they´ll develop something more groundbreaking next.

Re: Zelda Series Timeline Wasn't Planned From the Beginning

That_Guy_from_Faxana

@Kaine_Morrison Surprise Yeah, Zelda 1 & 2 were the only games connected in the beginning, everything became a mess when Nintendo started using "other" Links. Well, to be honest even Zelda II messes things up with the talk aobut "another princess Zelda".

The games are best played as separate experiences, there isn´t much of substance in the story anyway. Just very enjoyable games.

Re: Sakaguchi - 'Certain Ideas' Missed in The Last Story Due to SD Resolution

That_Guy_from_Faxana

@Wesker
He bought the game, and that´s what counts. The first months of sales are generally used to measure if the game´s sold good or not.

Besides, secondhand market has existed as long as trade itself, so it doesn´t damage the industry one bit. The gaming industry just needs to accept that once we´ve payed for their product, we own that copy and are free to give it away, sell it or throw it in the trash.