Comments 1,251

Re: Talking Point: So, How Are You Liking The Castlevania: Belmont's Curse Demo?

axelhander

Suppose I should talk about the game itself:

Thoughts: it's 1 part traditional Igavania (exploration, the Castlevania bits obviously), 1 part Dead Cells (movement and combat), and 1 part Hollow Knight (potions and the Souls-like checkpoints).

Though I got bored of Hollow Knight and didn't care too much for Dead Cells, I'm liking what I've played of Belmont's Curse. Great voice acting, intriguing story, pretty visuals, and feels good to play. What more could you want?

If you NEED this to be more like an Igavania wait for the next Bloodstained. Otherwise, try the demo.

(Note I played on Switch 2. Apparently the S1 stutters, but the S2 had no such issues for me.)

Re: Talking Point: So, How Are You Liking The Castlevania: Belmont's Curse Demo?

axelhander

@Noelemahc SotN was nothing like Rondo. At all.

What I said stands: if Belmont's Curse being unlike past games is a flaw, than SotN has the same flaw.

Nothing wrong with disliking BC or SotN or any game. But this trend to fetishize what came before and hate on any deviation is profoundly stupid, as is the notion that deviation makes something "not a true X."

Belmont's Curse is a Castlevania game.
Final Fantasy 16 is a Final Fantasy game.
Zelda 2 is a Zelda game.

You don't have to (dis)like any of them, but it doesn't change what they are. Arguing otherwise is just another attempt to objectify an opinion, and it's reason #8247 to avoid fanbases/fandoms.