Comments 4,860

Re: UK Government Warns It "Will Not Hesitate To Consider Legislation" Against Loot Boxes

BloodNinja

@BreathingMiit Wouldn't that require you to investigate individuals who have taken the program, and then look at individual programs to see how they are run, instead of just blanket-painting them as all bad? If a local community has found that a particular center for alcohol treatment isn't working, remove that facility and keep the ones that are helping. All programs that are run by people are not going to be any better than the people that run them/researched them/set them up, etc.

Re: UK Government Warns It "Will Not Hesitate To Consider Legislation" Against Loot Boxes

BloodNinja

@AndyMK84 Alcoholic programs DO stop the problem for individuals, but I can see that you are automatically thinking of people as groups. There are no groups. Only individuals. If an alcoholic program helped someone, it did it's job. They work, and people's lives have changed as a result of their use. There are literal tonnes of people that have reaped the benefits of such programs.

You can only solve societal problems a single individual at a time.

Re: UK Government Warns It "Will Not Hesitate To Consider Legislation" Against Loot Boxes

BloodNinja

@AndyMK84 Because it clouds the argument about government regulation. They're arguing from the standpoint that it hurts their gameplay. They don't give a rats ass about how it affects a stranger, let alone a child. Pure selfishness, is what that is. It doesn't have a place in the argument.

And honestly, so what? To draw a parallel: if you're a woodworker, there are going to be people out there that can afford precise laser cutters, and people who can only afford a jig-saw. The end result will show. Haves and have-nots and what have you.

Re: UK Government Warns It "Will Not Hesitate To Consider Legislation" Against Loot Boxes

BloodNinja

@AndyMK84 As soon as you said "parents giving in," you acknowledged their power in this situation, meaning the government isn't needed for this instance. I'm not against regulation, but it should be used for the right things. If parents choose to give in or enforce lootboxes (of all things) that's their business. I think too many triggered gamers are afraid of lootboxes, so they argue from that standpoint. That's a general hypothetical, and not a suggestion as to your mindset.

Governments should only have to step in when the behavior is destructive or risks the child's well-being. If a parent can't manage a credit card, no government is going to stop that problem lol. Doesn't matter what context it's in. If they screw up with lootboxes, they are probably screwing the pooch, elsewhere. Plug one hole, another appears, so to speak.

Re: UK Government Warns It "Will Not Hesitate To Consider Legislation" Against Loot Boxes

BloodNinja

@AndyMK84 There's no such thing as common sense. All knowledge is taught and either learned or not learned. That being said, if a parent can't figure out their child's game the government doesn't need to step in to fix every little mishap. Remember, some people learn by living and falling. Don't try to catch every single person that falls: you'll put them in a position where they may not learn how to catch themselves.

Re: Poll: So, How Do You Pronounce 'Live A Live'?

BloodNinja

@CountDrakeulah If my memory serves me, Burger King, Carl's Jr, Wendy's, IHOP and Denny's. Happened in the early 2000's, supposedly a response to the French being against whatever war we were fighting in the Middle East at the time. Weird nation we are, sometimes!