SilvercatMoonpaw

I don't like the new look. But I don't have to like it: there are tons of great games I don't play for reasons that are completely personal. I genuinely hope many people enjoy it.

And I actually have a Switch 2 now.

I'd rather see graphics that run on more systems, whatever that entails.

There is a perverse part of me that would let Nintendo have said patent simply to force other developers to do something different with their mon-games.

To Be Clear: I don't want Nintendo to have that monopoly. I simply wish that more mon-games did something different from the usual "human controlling monsters" gimmick.

Part of me wants to wait, because I'm not convinced by the game library yet.

Another part simply does not want to pay any more than I have to.

Also:

"I still don't have a Switch 2."

I don't even have a Switch 2 yet.

It would help if these polls didn't have limits on how many Pokemon you could choose. Just because I picked 3 or 5 of whatever doesn't mean I don't like lots of others.

I haven't played anything with Talking Flower in it.

As much as I really don't want to pay for a Switch 2, I do think it's a really good idea they don't try to cram a Switch 2 game onto Switch 1.

Colosseum, but now with full open world.

Game Freak should focus on making their games cheaper.

For the price of this game, I can get multiple games I want more for Steam Deck.

@contractcooker
I can't even play games that long, so I wouldn't know.

You don't need the Deck Dock, just a USB-C to HDMI adapter.

That's all I need to say: I'll let people make up their own minds which they think is better for them.

Game companies should stop making games that they have to charge such high prices for.

Or just get rid of whoever they're paying the most salary.

It's an obvious 4/1 joke, but having a way to get through hard sections without simply watching the rest of the game on Youtube would count as an accessibility aid, I'd say.

Switch is the only thing I've got that can play this right now, so while I will wait for a sale, I either need to get this and ignore the technical issues or drop the idea altogether.

I don't want it to become standard. I like having games that don't need reflexes.

That said, I don't mind if some Pokemon games use it, even mainline games. I simply don't want to feel shut out of Pokemon because my reaction timing is off.

I have a Wii U, Gamecube, N64, SNES, two NES, a GBA, GB Color, GB Pocket, and original GB. I don't get rid of consoles.

(Plus I don't think I can afford a Switch 2, whatever the price. I might have to skip console generations again.)

Nah, I'm good with digital. Feel bad for people who want a physical having to jump through hoops, though.

At least it's something.

YMMV.

You worry about aging hands, but I worry about aging eyes. I tried to get into the 2DS late in its life, but couldn't stand how small the screen was. So while it's not likely to matter to me how big the Switch is (docked-only for life!), I can't agree with smaller screen sizes.

Of course, ever since my Joy-cons drifted I don't bother to use them.

Little Kitty, Big City.

I think boxes are traditional for drawing stuff out of in Japan, if random anime I watched is any indication.

I find it weird that "publishers don't want you to block them" means anything because visibility doesn't change my purchasing decisions. We can already block them mentally.

@MontyCircus
If that's what's going on, then I'm even more on board with consoles, and even more on board with consoles where the games don't have big memory requirements. Because not everyone has the connection speed to stream games.

Less features, so we can save money.

Couldn't agree more, because battling has become the most boring part of the Pokemon series.

Just press "+" and use the menu there. I only use "D-Right" if I know I've just recently used an echo.

Trying not to play anything this weekend: need to save my aging hands and wrists for Zelda on Thursday.

It's mostly I don't think I have the kind of money to upgrade right away.

Give me the original, including Frog's unnecessary Shakespearian.

I generally prefer to go by graphics.......mostly because it's often the only metric I can actually measure myself.

My two answers of "Too much" and "Less than US$40" come with a caveat that they're due to my current economic situation and might change if I had more money.

But my real feeling is that game developers make too many "high quality" games, and should go back to simpler graphics and other cost-saving measures.

Tears of the Kingdom did not compel me the same way Breath of the Wild did, and I burned out on trying to do everything before Ganondorf, so I don't feel much compulsion to finish.

But I might one day: it took me something like 20 years to get back to Link to the Past and fight the final Ganon battle, so I don't feel any pressure to hurry.

I'm happy for physical people. But can us digitals get a better store?

It wouldn't matter to me, but that's because mine are kaput.

Also I never heard them "click".

I'm not sure I can tell the difference.

Though it doesn't matter, as I need to save my money for more important games.

Unfortunately, the only Fallout that's ever spoken to me is Fallout 4.

If it helps anyone as much as it did me, the endings are available on the Hollow Knight wiki. If you want to earn them yourself that's great, but it took a lot of weight off me knowing I didn't need to finish to see those.

As to the length of development:

I was reminded elsewhere that this isn't the first or longest time a sequel has been delayed. And compared to games that have been released in unfinished states just to hit a date, I don't want Silksong to suffer that fate.

@CJD87
It's okay if you don't like something many other people like. I'd probably have an easier time counting all the games I liked the same as the majority than not.

I'd only buy a third game if it was significantly different in content, probably enough to be its own entry.

Why no option for "Nothing — I already get all my games digital"?

Ah, finally, a Nintendo game I can look forward to. (Other than Silksong. But that's Silksong.)

I can kind of see where Team Cherry is coming from with any silence: the reputation of video game fans overreacting has only seemed to grow over the years. It may seem safer to them to communicate absolutely nothing until they have good news.

I can agree that there are aspects of Palworld that Pokemon should shamelessly rip-off. I just hope "survival" isn't one of them ("guns" neither).

I just shrug my shoulders; it's not my job to police this. Considering I can't even play this game (Nintendo and Mac user), I don't even have the choice whether or not I silently support one or the other (and let's face it: no one would even notice if I chose).