SilvercatMoonpaw

Game Freak should focus on making their games cheaper.

For the price of this game, I can get multiple games I want more for Steam Deck.

@contractcooker
I can't even play games that long, so I wouldn't know.

You don't need the Deck Dock, just a USB-C to HDMI adapter.

That's all I need to say: I'll let people make up their own minds which they think is better for them.

Game companies should stop making games that they have to charge such high prices for.

Or just get rid of whoever they're paying the most salary.

It's an obvious 4/1 joke, but having a way to get through hard sections without simply watching the rest of the game on Youtube would count as an accessibility aid, I'd say.

Switch is the only thing I've got that can play this right now, so while I will wait for a sale, I either need to get this and ignore the technical issues or drop the idea altogether.

I don't want it to become standard. I like having games that don't need reflexes.

That said, I don't mind if some Pokemon games use it, even mainline games. I simply don't want to feel shut out of Pokemon because my reaction timing is off.

I have a Wii U, Gamecube, N64, SNES, two NES, a GBA, GB Color, GB Pocket, and original GB. I don't get rid of consoles.

(Plus I don't think I can afford a Switch 2, whatever the price. I might have to skip console generations again.)

Nah, I'm good with digital. Feel bad for people who want a physical having to jump through hoops, though.

At least it's something.

YMMV.

You worry about aging hands, but I worry about aging eyes. I tried to get into the 2DS late in its life, but couldn't stand how small the screen was. So while it's not likely to matter to me how big the Switch is (docked-only for life!), I can't agree with smaller screen sizes.

Of course, ever since my Joy-cons drifted I don't bother to use them.

Little Kitty, Big City.

I think boxes are traditional for drawing stuff out of in Japan, if random anime I watched is any indication.

I find it weird that "publishers don't want you to block them" means anything because visibility doesn't change my purchasing decisions. We can already block them mentally.

@MontyCircus
If that's what's going on, then I'm even more on board with consoles, and even more on board with consoles where the games don't have big memory requirements. Because not everyone has the connection speed to stream games.

Less features, so we can save money.

Couldn't agree more, because battling has become the most boring part of the Pokemon series.

Just press "+" and use the menu there. I only use "D-Right" if I know I've just recently used an echo.

Trying not to play anything this weekend: need to save my aging hands and wrists for Zelda on Thursday.

It's mostly I don't think I have the kind of money to upgrade right away.

Give me the original, including Frog's unnecessary Shakespearian.

I generally prefer to go by graphics.......mostly because it's often the only metric I can actually measure myself.

My two answers of "Too much" and "Less than US$40" come with a caveat that they're due to my current economic situation and might change if I had more money.

But my real feeling is that game developers make too many "high quality" games, and should go back to simpler graphics and other cost-saving measures.

Tears of the Kingdom did not compel me the same way Breath of the Wild did, and I burned out on trying to do everything before Ganondorf, so I don't feel much compulsion to finish.

But I might one day: it took me something like 20 years to get back to Link to the Past and fight the final Ganon battle, so I don't feel any pressure to hurry.

I'm happy for physical people. But can us digitals get a better store?

It wouldn't matter to me, but that's because mine are kaput.

Also I never heard them "click".

I'm not sure I can tell the difference.

Though it doesn't matter, as I need to save my money for more important games.

Unfortunately, the only Fallout that's ever spoken to me is Fallout 4.

If it helps anyone as much as it did me, the endings are available on the Hollow Knight wiki. If you want to earn them yourself that's great, but it took a lot of weight off me knowing I didn't need to finish to see those.

As to the length of development:

I was reminded elsewhere that this isn't the first or longest time a sequel has been delayed. And compared to games that have been released in unfinished states just to hit a date, I don't want Silksong to suffer that fate.

@CJD87
It's okay if you don't like something many other people like. I'd probably have an easier time counting all the games I liked the same as the majority than not.

I'd only buy a third game if it was significantly different in content, probably enough to be its own entry.

Why no option for "Nothing — I already get all my games digital"?

Ah, finally, a Nintendo game I can look forward to. (Other than Silksong. But that's Silksong.)

I can kind of see where Team Cherry is coming from with any silence: the reputation of video game fans overreacting has only seemed to grow over the years. It may seem safer to them to communicate absolutely nothing until they have good news.

I can agree that there are aspects of Palworld that Pokemon should shamelessly rip-off. I just hope "survival" isn't one of them ("guns" neither).

I just shrug my shoulders; it's not my job to police this. Considering I can't even play this game (Nintendo and Mac user), I don't even have the choice whether or not I silently support one or the other (and let's face it: no one would even notice if I chose).

I'm kind of getting annoyed at these poll choices that make it hard to tell if I'm simply choosing a "positive/negative", or am going to be judged. I choose "Professor who?" because it sounded less confrontational than the "No Way!" option, but my real opinion is that I'm not interested in these games.

@Wexter I think this is definitely one of those times the art needs to be adjusted for the medium.

I've never sold any of the others, and I'm not likely to start now.

I hate that it's going to be live-action. I just do not feel video game movies work in live-action.

Can I vote for "None of them"?

I like that Prehistoric Paradoxes are each their own design (some more than others). Whereas the Robot Paradoxes generally seem like copies of their inspirations with a chrome job (Iron Valiant being a stand-out).

I recently looked this up, and the article I found pointed out that playing Season second results in more connections to the story of Ages than the other way around. To the point of which General Onox mentions hearing about Link, but Veran will not.

I have no proof of this, and cannot even figure out where I read that, so there's no reason to believe me.

What did it for me was not that there was too much to do, but that there seemed to be a lot more enemies all over. Barring places with patrolling Guardians and the like, BotW felt peaceful and relaxing. TotK, by contrast, had too many people and people-like monsters: it felt crowded, and I don't like crowds.

I feel that after three 3D games where people have complained about the graphics, Pokemon needs to stop trying and go back to 2D graphics. Focus on being great at something else.

I bounced hard off TotK, so I'm leery of the idea of them making another Zelda game set in this Hyrule. I feel like for TotK they recycled BotW too much, including elements of the plot that only worked the first time, and I'm paranoid now that if another game is set in the same setting that said pattern will repeat for a third time.

I'm thinking Lizard/Rabbit.