Comments 75

Re: Poll: What Review Score Would You Give Pokémon Scarlet And Violet?

SilvercatMoonpaw

@jowe_gw
I meant "What happens next in the story of the game I am currently playing."

And I gave it a 9/10, and even that's not a certain vote from me: I have things about the game I don't like that aren't about performance. But there are things I like about the game that mean I'd rather give it a higher score.

Your Milage Is Allowed To Vary.

Re: Review: Pokémon Scarlet And Violet - An Open-World Poké Playground Full Of Promise (And Tech Issues)

SilvercatMoonpaw

@Friendly
Exactly my thoughts; three games where everyone complains about performance should signal to Game Freak that they're trying too hard. I get that every big game developer wants to create these epic experiences, but I think that's an illusion: games with much less ambitious designs do perfectly well. Game Freak should scale back to 2D for a few games, maybe see if they can replicate the in-world battles in that format.

As to ScarVi itself: still getting it, because there's only one other game in the whole of gamedom I care about right now and it doesn't have a release date. I need something to do.

Re: Feature: Dynamax Ain’t That Bad - Pokemon’s Recent Battle Mechanics Ranked

SilvercatMoonpaw

I didn't get back into the series until Sword & Shield, so I never experienced Mega Evolution or Z-Moves in action.

But Dynamaxing is kind of dull: I'm never excited when it happens. It's a couple turns of big attacks and some extra HP. Mega Evolutions at least look cool (so do Gigantimaxes, but are hard to acquire).

Yet at the same time.............maybe we should forget the gimmicks, Maybe this is the opinion of someone who hasn't spent years getting bored with the usual Pokémon mechanics, but I feel like simple gameplay changes like infinite TMs and inherent EXP share are the real star mechanics.

  • Page :
  • 2