Comments 213

Re: Talking Point: After 30 Years, Is It Time To Reset The Pokédex?

breach187

I always try to make an effort to use a team of Pokemon I’ve never used before whenever I play a new title in the franchise. This doesn’t necessarily mean only new ones introduced in that game, but I will still try to include them.

When Sword and Shield was announced as not having the full roster, I was on Team Upset. However, now I’m beginning to agree that the dex has become fairly bloated and something needs to be done. I’m going to take the all or nothing stance here and say that they should start fresh with an all new roster. My reason behind that is that when they start trimming Pokemon out, they’ll inevitably upset some players because that was their favorite ‘mon. By starting fresh, nobody will feel targeted and expectations will be reset.

Re: Poll: Will You Be Getting Pokémon FireRed Or LeafGreen On Switch?

breach187

I won’t be buying this because I already have Let’s Go Eevee, but I don’t hate that it exists. We should always celebrate more options to play older games, even if the value proposition doesn’t make sense to some people. I just hope Gamefreak and Nintendo don’t expect this to pull New Pokemon Game sales numbers.

I do think it should also be available as part of the NSO sub in addition to this, but I could see how that would eat into sales at a time where Nintendo is in a good financial position and doesn’t necessarily have to play to the customers.

Re: Review: Virtual Boy For Switch 1 & 2 - Is It Really Worth Revisting Nintendo's Greatest Folly?

breach187

I don’t think this thing shouldn’t exist. It’s a cool little niche trinket that would look good on a display, even if retro enthusiasts would be more interested in a fully authentic reproduction rather than a barely functional mimicry.
My issue is that it’s an extra purchase on top of an extra purchase on top of an expensive purchase. It’s a hardware accessory that requires a subscription to use. Lastly, there’s no reason why VB games require this thing. Every game I’ve played had the 3d element being a neat addition, but not required.

This SHOULD have been an OPTIONAL accessory, not a required one.

Re: 'Can You Use Labo VR Goggles For Virtual Boy Games On Switch?' & Other Nintendo Classics VB Questions Answered

breach187

I played almost every VB title including unofficial titles on the 3DS and my takeaway was that the 3D effect was nice, but unnecessary. I couldn’t find a single title that needed the 3D effect to play. The fact that this additional accessory purchase is required for the additional cost expansion pak for the additional cost NSO subscription for a console you spent $300+ is kinda ridiculous. It feels like triple dipping.

Re: Two Cancelled Virtual Boy Games Coming To NSO In 2026, Including F-Zero Spin-Off

breach187

@Yydeckard I disagree with the logic here. The stereoscopic 3D was a gimmick but is completely unnecessary in practice, but the Virtual Boy itself was a console. It would be like forcing people to buy a GameBoy shell to play GB games on NSO. Completely unnecessary, even if it would be a cool thing to have.
They should let people play the games without an accessory, and make the cool accessory optional.