Comments 238

Re: Ratatan Dev Cancels The Switch Version

breach187

None of this seems relevant because you can already play Switch 1 games on the Switch 2, and PS4 games on the PS5. (Unsure about Xbox)
If anything they should cancel the Switch 2 and PS5 versions since they’re redundant.

Re: Random: AI Has Ruined A Classic Mario Cartoon On MeTV

breach187

Let’s not rose-tinted glasses here. The Super Mario Bros cartoons were NOTORIOUSLY bad quality; ESPECIALLY the Mario Bros 3 episodes. I recently watched them and made it a game to see how many animation and/or coloring errors I could find in each episode. There were MANY.

While AI certainly didn’t help here, it didn’t help because the source was already awful.

But all that aside, don’t let it stop you from enjoying it. It’s a piece of history and one I’m fond of (mostly due to nostalgia, but still…).

Re: Poll: So, Will You Be Getting Pokémon Pokopia?

breach187

I absolutely refuse to buy Game Key Cards. I will never buy one. I might consider the digital release if it goes on sale. But the fact that they’re already lousing the game up with FOMO disinclines me to buying it in the future as well.

Re: Talking Point: After 30 Years, Is It Time To Reset The Pokédex?

breach187

I always try to make an effort to use a team of Pokemon I’ve never used before whenever I play a new title in the franchise. This doesn’t necessarily mean only new ones introduced in that game, but I will still try to include them.

When Sword and Shield was announced as not having the full roster, I was on Team Upset. However, now I’m beginning to agree that the dex has become fairly bloated and something needs to be done. I’m going to take the all or nothing stance here and say that they should start fresh with an all new roster. My reason behind that is that when they start trimming Pokemon out, they’ll inevitably upset some players because that was their favorite ‘mon. By starting fresh, nobody will feel targeted and expectations will be reset.

Re: Poll: Will You Be Getting Pokémon FireRed Or LeafGreen On Switch?

breach187

I won’t be buying this because I already have Let’s Go Eevee, but I don’t hate that it exists. We should always celebrate more options to play older games, even if the value proposition doesn’t make sense to some people. I just hope Gamefreak and Nintendo don’t expect this to pull New Pokemon Game sales numbers.

I do think it should also be available as part of the NSO sub in addition to this, but I could see how that would eat into sales at a time where Nintendo is in a good financial position and doesn’t necessarily have to play to the customers.

Re: Review: Virtual Boy For Switch 1 & 2 - Is It Really Worth Revisting Nintendo's Greatest Folly?

breach187

I don’t think this thing shouldn’t exist. It’s a cool little niche trinket that would look good on a display, even if retro enthusiasts would be more interested in a fully authentic reproduction rather than a barely functional mimicry.
My issue is that it’s an extra purchase on top of an extra purchase on top of an expensive purchase. It’s a hardware accessory that requires a subscription to use. Lastly, there’s no reason why VB games require this thing. Every game I’ve played had the 3d element being a neat addition, but not required.

This SHOULD have been an OPTIONAL accessory, not a required one.

Re: 'Can You Use Labo VR Goggles For Virtual Boy Games On Switch?' & Other Nintendo Classics VB Questions Answered

breach187

I played almost every VB title including unofficial titles on the 3DS and my takeaway was that the 3D effect was nice, but unnecessary. I couldn’t find a single title that needed the 3D effect to play. The fact that this additional accessory purchase is required for the additional cost expansion pak for the additional cost NSO subscription for a console you spent $300+ is kinda ridiculous. It feels like triple dipping.