Sanangelo89

Still aint worth it. A bad game is a bad game.

I thought of this.

Like if you want to play Mario Kart on XB1 you pay 60 dollars for 1 month play. And vice versa, play Gears of War on Switch also 60 bucks for 1 month play.

Its crossplay but its obviously more cheaper if you buy it as a 1st party. I can see something like that happen, if i would support it is anotherthing.

@huyi Lol thats not true, the 3DS isnt holding the Switch from anything, you arent saying this from a business perspective.

The 3ds still sells very well and its popularity shouldnt be denied. if it still has a potential to sell 1 million a year why stop selling it? If you were nintendo you wouldnt do that either (no sane person would do that).

a lot of people who buy a 3DS that arent interested in a Switch (because of price, games or combination of that).

3DS doesnt has to die, it is a nice budget alternative.

@Agramonte Lol, many games have prooven that the Switch can handle realistic graphics, youre just being a grampa.

Companies just dont want to take the effort. I really wonder how the next metroid prime will look and same foor Doom eternal

When Netflix makes a Zelda series i hope its based on Ocarina of Time. That one though simple, is the most easiest adaptable in a series.

@invictus4000

Before Pikachu became famous? I hardly believe that unless you played it from the Japanese version otherwise Pikachu has been famous from the beginning. The Anime debuted first in the west before the games.

Nice discussion about 3rd parties in de comment section.

I like Doom on Switch a lot i can say that, but for somebody like me...

I wouldnt have bought Doom if i had a PS4 because they are normally not my type of games but that it runs on a device like the Switch (and still looks like a AAA game) is just wonderous to experience and people that see me play are also amazed that this 'gameboy' like device runs Doom. Only the PSP had that same effect but the tricks where much easier to see for casuals then with the Switch (and i only know one guy with the Vita but he only used it for streaming from his PS4).

Ofcourse many smartphones, that in raw power could do the same but the 'idea' is still very futuristic for a lot of people, thats very much underestimated within the gaming community or on sites like this. Besides that phones arent really made for gaming, if that wouldv been that much of a hit then handheld gaming wouldve died years ago.

For me there is no need for a 'switch pro', still much the device can show, Doom Eternal might be the first AAA 3rd party game that will show the Switch's full potential.

Switch pro release should be around late 2020 not sooner.

@Lando_ That, seems more like Dutch.

'Alles stabiel'

Obvious nonsense, and is just PR talk.

ofcourse Reggie needs to defend the app its his job.

i understand the discussion but what i dont get is why videogames are seen as being more controversial when it comes to violence then movies or series.

Look at Netflix, Netflix has mostly violent shows and some unnecessarely gorey.

No wonder, i bought fifa18 last Juli for 20 bucks only to buy the new for 60 bucks?

Hell to the naw! and Fifa18 is the first soccer game ive ever bought in my whole life.

My weekend:

MGS 3D
Zelda MM
Bayonetta
Doom
and Maybe Mario Odysee.

I also want to buy PS4 but my 3ds and Switch alreadt provide me with so much entertainment its pure greed and though i spiderman seems like a killer game en same for God of War, i dont feel i really miss on them.

Also need to buy Zelda BOTW still, you guys have no idea that i am deep in paradise as a gamer.

@Scottwood101 Lol i was never in.

arent many times i play online and as a 'offline gamer' there is nothing special for me.

This game doesnt interest me at all and this has nothing to do with the Switch.

Doom and Wolf2 got me intrigued and i dont like fps that much, i like action games but Dark Souls just seems boring to me

PS1 one is my second gaming machine after the Gameboy.

But this obviously points out that Sony is watching what Nintendo is doing for sure.

Nintendo isnt the first one but they are the ones gaining mainstream succes with it classic minis.

There were many demands for something like this from Playstation fans way before the NES classic even existed, Why didnt they do it sooner.

You know what i don't get. Yes we have directs and last the E3 but not everything has been announced through these platforms.

I dont base new games coming only on what is presented through E3 or Directs. I think a lot more announcements will come.

Doom Eternal for Switch was announced through a tweet.

@JaxonH i understand what you say, still i feel they played us in a way.

Why not announce immidiately that this game would come. Instead they gave some vague prediction of 'some' FFXV game coming.

Ofcourse people will hope for the main game to come, especially knowing and seeing that the Switch is quit a capable console.

NBA2K19 is another game prooving that the Switch can be seen as a full worthy homeconsole. Its again not the best looking one butoit still looks very good.

FFXV might still come and its not really about that (it might never come) but they could be more clear about pocket edition coming and not act like that one is the main dish while its not.

@Pod octopath traveler is a new game, i agree.

But it doesnt utilize the power of the Switch. i dont expect XB1X graphics or even base PS4 but lets all be honest, SQ-E just pooped this game on the Switch for a quick cashgrab.

There is no passion behind it like with Doom or even Octopath Traveler.

Ok someone reacted on my comment, i accidentally pressed on report when i wanted to react on his comment.
now i cant find his nor my comment. Im sorry.

Ok,

This is very disappointing. Then just not give us FFXV at all. Would rather have a original game.

I could defend developers when it came to the Wii U especially with the obligated gamepad but the Switch is a capable machine.

FF12 remake wouldv been better or even FF13 games. i really feel dissed by Square Enix, not just as a Switch owner but as a gamer in general now prefering Nintendo.

You will hate me for this but i am so bumped that the direct is delayed.

This is a sign that the next Zelda should be a Switch exclusive based on the Switch its power.

What?!

It might come to Switch? Hahaha Lol, it better come to Switch. Like many have already stated, Breat of the Wild is technically a Wii U game or a port in that sense.

If he isnt busy with the next Zelda for the Switch i really wonder what in the H.F.I.L. he is doing now?

If the next zelda isnt a Switch exclusive, that would be a big dumper on Switch owners to be honest.

I dont mind a few remakes or ports before the next zelda like WW and TP but i want a new one exclusively before the next nintendo system.

@Ganondorf_ Thats what i am saying.

It was just a hype that Microsoft pushed very much, ala PC gaming and this still happens in general through 'graphical push'. developers are projecting PC needs on the console industry and the Switch kind of breaks that and only Bethesda and Panic button are kind of seeing through this.

I am sorry but ive never bought a CoD game and Doom on switch is the first FPS ive ever bought in my life.

Even on the Playstation consoles FPS dont really interest me that much to have spend money on it and i agree with the guy saying it has been popularized with the XBox360 era that is an after effect of Halo 2 being very popular on the OG Xbox (i did like Halo 2 though).

That CoD is multiplayer only makes it less of a reason for me to be interested in nevermind buying it.

Yes the Switch needs 3rd party but CoD isnt the one the Switch needs.

@oji enough games to play, also not everyone who has consoles play them consistently to have finished or even bought everything that is released today.

I have my Switch almost a year and i still havent bought Zelda BOTW nor Xenoblade 2 but i have bought many others.

My 3DS also still deserve my attention and many others like me.

a game being AAA doesnt mean anything its just the status of the developers or the budget that went into the game.

Monster Hunter for 59,99 euros?!!!

Goodbye Capcom. Already have enough to play.

I still holding if on Zelda BOTW because i still play Zelda MM on my 3ds. Same for Xenoblade and DK Country returns(bought last one for 15 bucks on the 3ds eshop).

If they re-release Zelda WW and TP on Switch before i have BOTW i will buy those before BOTW too.

@HobbitGamer hahaha, ive bought a PS2 again in 2015.

I just really needed to play DBZ Tenkaichi 3.

I understand what he says but he shouldnt be bothered by that. Miyamoto is just reconfirming Nintendos main vision.

A lot of people know what free to play games are and what to expect compared to most games you pay full price for.

People who pay for Mario games already own a Nintendo console something most people are 'brainwashed' to do for decades. PokemonGo kind of played more on its 'popculture' status and thats something Gamefreak knows better then Nintendo with their own IPs.

@HobbitGamer But they couldnt base it on WiiU sales because ME3 was a Wii U launch window title.

With DarkSouls, for new players its a proper introduction as a Remaster.
People are only upset that the others got a trilogy while that didnt need development time. Releasing that for the Switch would mean another delay.

I do hope they release a combo back for DS 2 and 3 for Switch owners later on. 

Isnt really an issue.

If youd really care about DS2 and 3 then you wouldv bought them on PS4 or XB1 earlier, it doesnt change anything for the Switch.

So people expect them to have been buissy porting the other 2 games while DSRem. isnt even released yet after being delayed. WoW, thats kinda fooling yourself with high expectations. NamcoBandai admitted regretting not investing earlier in the Switch so its kind of understandable now.

This is also very much different then the WIIU with Mass Effect, that was only the 3rd game being released and then the ps3 and xb360 had the trilogy while being weaker then the Wii U.

Bioware couldv much better released the METrilogy on launch with the Wii U because they must have desided at the same time to create the Trilogy when releasing it next to ME3Wiiu version.

I agree the announcement is kinda goofy but Switch owners get a proper introduction to the series and it think its much more intended for new players.

There are a lot of Playstation and Xbox and other type of gamers who never played Dark Souls and got intrigued by it because of the Switch(though i think they will buy the trilogy now), same goes for Doom and Wolfenstein.

The Switch is doing good enough. A lot of people are also saying that they dont see many Switch players out in the open but they said the same thing about the 3DS and its still selling like hotcakes.

@penamiguel92 Yes i am also very excited for Doom Eternal on Switch.

Games like these normally never excite me on PS4 but on Switch i get hyped, contradicting i know but i cant help it.

i became a bit skeptic but now that bethesda has announced Doom Eternal for Switch i call bs for 3rd party situations as this.

Through Bethesda it kinda seems that other developers just arent really trying only thinking about losses instead of being more optimistic to invest in de Switch with developing games.

I really hope with Doom ET, Bethesda will start the 'new' line of games in 2019 after 2017 and 2018 being the years of ports of (still recent) games.

I looove DBZ, but i want DBZ and Naruto etc. to stay out of Smash Bros.

Smash bros should be exclusive to characters originated in Games.

The only way i can accept this slipping is with Sora from Kingdom Hearts with Goofy and Donald but even if that would happen they could have Sora in Smash without refering to Disney at all to not cross that line.

I think games, even like God of War can run on Switch perfectly if they are developed with it in mind from the start instead of porting it an then making downgrades and compremises.

Ofcourse not with the same fidelty but still better then what has been done with Doom en especially Wolf2.

I am pretty sure that if these games were specifically made for Switch it would look a bit better but would benefit performance a lot more (a more stable 30fps atleast en 900p docked, 720p at mininum while docked).

Maybe i am ignorant and naive but i believe Nintendo thought this through when developing the Switch (after the Wii U) and that only Panic Button and Bethesda are the ones really seeing this power the Switch has and are putting effort to get used to the hardware that has lesser power.

Look at Doom Eternal, just from one glance you see it obviously has more going on than Doom 2016 and they have planned for the Switch wondering why everyone is suprised.

PS4 and XB1 are amazing but homeconsoles getting more power and higher visual fidelty capabilities is a lot less impressive then a Tablet like the Switch producing graphics higher then the PS3 close to PS4.

Also [removed] 4K! 720p, 900p and 1080p are still perfectly fine resolution even in 2018 and beyond.

I think there are references in each game that connect them, but people shouldnt take it that seriously.

Its just something to keep the fanbase going and keep it fun outside the games.
But in no way something to be upset about if you see contradicting things. They never really promoted the Timeline and they shouldnt. I dont mind direct sequels like Majoras Mask(still on my 1st playthrough on 3ds) but even that one doesnt refer to OoC that much.

Whats also funny is now that they have kinda ditched the green tunic the have a lot more liberty conceptually amd visually. They can have a legend of zelda with more futuristic or sci fi elements.
Him wearing the green always had a medieval kinda look that i cant imagine to translate well in a more scifi setting not counting it as a DLC add on for funs

Yes finally someone made a bag i can carry around my shoulder. This is exactly what need.

I dont want my kids to watch this.

Both SonicX and Megaman Nt warrior were better then this. Both had flaws but they atleast complimented the source material very well visually and storywise too and are better Animes then Pokemon is in many ways.

All i'am saying to all of you is to not buy 3rd party shiz for charging and docking.

If you plan to connect to a TV then bring your dock with you. No body has issue with other consoles doing this so why with the Switch? i dont get this form of hypocrisy.

I believe in Panic Button.

Besides them i am curious if GTA 5 will come to Switch. If that happens its gonna be all over. Or maybe GTA 6 if thats gonna happen

totally unbothered. I really would love to play this game but it really aint high on my list and this has nothing to do with the Switch!

If i had a PS4 or XB1 they i highly doubt this game would interest me as much then it being on Switch.

Same with Doom, i bought on Switch but it will neven interest me on a PS4 if i had one, i am more of the God of War or Spiderman type of games. Unfortunately they came out this year so i bought a Switch last year in september and i am glad i did.

Liked it at 1st glance but i rather keep it simple like it is now. The only thing thing the Switch UI needs is way to put games in folders and so you can choose whuch game you want as a cover for that folder.

Like if you have a folder for action games you can put a Bayonetta thumbnail for that folder as an example.

480p on handheld is still good for a game like this. The Naruto games on Switch also have a lower setting but it still look good enough to play and have a blast.

Ive heard all versions arent well optimized even the Pro and OneX versions so its obviously a developers thing but Crash, despite being popular is always considered as A or at highest AA while Sonic and Mario where the AAA platformers with mostly Sonic [removed] things up also losing the AAA label in many ways.

I think Activision just lowered the handheld resolution to 480p because of battery live, instead of optimizing it to balance it out well like many other games.

@Chrno-x thanks for your reply, i dont mind graphics that much, i am playing Doom and i think the graphics look great. I see it in comparison videos but actually playing i wonder what people are fussing about.

I just wonder that if they make a realistic looking game from the start for Switch how will that turn out?

To me Wolfenstein 2 and Doom still hasnt shown the full potential of the Switch, it has just shown its raw power compared to PS4 and XB1 with these games.

Same goes for a lot of ports, DBXV2 too i just now that it would look a bit better would it be build from the ground up, instead of compressing it for porting.

Despite the sacrifices this port looks amazing, though i wonder why this is.

I understand that framerate and resolution is more based on power, but textures?

I think the textures are low because of keeping the data as low as possible. For instance if the Switch version had larger data or 32 gb cards at minimal, would they be able to raise the texture quality without effecting the performance?

I think it works like that but i dont really know for sure.

if streaming becomes the only option and their wont be digital or physical then i will stop with videogaming.

This will take atleast 4 till 8 years for general consumers to enjoy(and i am trying to be safe).

Would be nice but i dont plan to buy a expensive phone just for better pictures and smartphone games.