OmegaDestroyer

Not really news, is it?

Is this some kind of joke? Atlus cannot be that oblivious to the fans clamoring for Persona 5 to come to the Switch.

I like how the article notes it doesn't mean any of these games will actually come to the Switch. I agree they will not and have no idea what Atlus actually wants the data for.

If the person is falling behind on rent payments due to a game, they need to take responsibility and get counseling for addiction first.

Worry about EA's crummy practices later.

Why would I support a company that barely supports the Switch?

@XBontendo
It's currently on sale 20% off on Steam.

If you do not like it, vote with your wallets. Capcom will keep pulling this crap ass long as people keep buying it.

Vote with your wallets. If you are upset 5 isn't coming to Switch, don't buy Persona Warriors.

@Dualmask
Yeah, going to be a pass from me then. I don't mind AIs getting advantages (Civ6 is my favorite game after all), but I hate it when it straight-up cheats.

I wonder if the AI still cheats by magically getting the pieces it needs at critical times. I remember that happening a lot as the game progressed when I first played the series.

Right...

And in November it will be delayed again.

About time. I was tired of my Switch copy collecting dust. Vanilla feels so lacking without the expansion content.

$50.00 for both expansions is a reasonable price.

The problem I have is that they lied about the quality of the game at PAX ("the Switch overheated") and then delayed the release a week supposedly to patch the game (which didn't really do anything). If they had just been honest about the port to begin with and put it back in the oven for a few more months, that would have been better than releasing a half-assed product.

We should not excuse lazy developers.

Igarashi is a clown and only a fool would trust anything he says. He absolutely knew what a poor state the Switch version was in and tried his best to deflect.

And more Switch fixes are incoming? Right. We've had how many now? Oh yeah. One. What incentive is there to even patch it at this point? They've made their money off the Switch port and Kickstarter.

Sounds intriguing.

@NinChocolate

Honestly, it makes more sense to aim for the PS4/Xbox/PC crowd due to the larger install bases and how much easier it appears to be to port to those systems. The Switch is still an outlier for development purposes.

One thing that really annoyed me was the delay of the Switch release to avoid negative reviews and the sites, such as Nintendo Life, that held on reviewing it until a patch was released, which tended to skew the score higher. It should have been reviewed in a pure state.

@NinChocolate
It was not originally slated for Nintendo systems. The WiiU version was a stretch goal, then it was canceled and a Switch port was announced well into development.

@JudgeMethos

Absolutely. They knew the Switch port was garbage when they showed it at PAX. They blamed the shoddy performance on "over heating" which was a bald-faced lie.

As to the article, it's just more empty words. They've already made their money on the Switch port. They are not going to magically make millions more when it's patched, so what's the rush? Obviously they do not really care about their reputation, otherwise they would have been honest about the Switch port from the get go and delayed it.

Does anyone actually trust Capcom's word on anything?

It must be hard having nothing better to do than to downvote a game because it is an exclusive. I would hate to be that pathetic.

$30 for an incomplete game?

I dig the look of the game but the game play itself looks awful.

@Paraka
According to Bloodstained's defenders, it was also playable when it was released.

My point stands. This is just another half-hearted attempt at porting the game to the Switch. It's not like the developers do not know they are releasing a shoddy port to the system. Time will tell if they even bother trying to patch it either.

In other words, it runs like garbage on the Switch and they don't want it to get even worse reviews that it already is.

Glad I waited. I heard this was basically a other Bloodstained situation.

Hard to get excited about this news seeing as how little relevance it has to Nintendo.

We have what from Atlus for this Gen? Q2, the Warrirors-esque nobody asked for, and Joker in Smash? Hard to really care about a company that doesn't really care too much about Nintendo.

@Chunkboi79
So long as it runs smoothly, it doesn't really bother me.

The proof is in the pudding. The Switch version hasn't and isn't a priority to the developers. They conned everyone with the overheating story. Then they conned everyone stating that it would be patched all along. Why should we have any faith in these clowns at this point?

Solid game. Never was able to beat it on PC though. Will double-dip.

Wow! What a pleasant surprise!

After lying to us about the PAX demo and releasing a lackluster port, how can we trust anything this guy says?

At this point, I would not expect much from any Switch patch. It's clear fixing the Switch version is not a critical priority as we were initially led to believe.

@SalvorHardin
Nope. There aren't any bosses to deal with. There is one bullet-sponge enemy in the game, a Killer Robot, that can take a severe beating but he is designed more to flee from than to kill.

I put a hundred hours into Streets of Rogue on PC and I'm very tempted to double dip for the Switch version. I have so many fond memories of the game. There's just something amazing about playing as a gorilla, with a gorilla posse, and chasing down a terrified drug dealer into an alley to dispense gorilla justice.

How brazen to release DLC before the core game has been fixed. Pathetic.

Looks like another Bloodstained-quality Switch port.

Pass.

She makes more sense on the roster than Joker.

Why does it need a patch? It was a 7/10 according to NL. It was fine.

Nice of you to cut the game some slack, NintendoLife. I expect nothing less from you guys.

@whanvee
RE: review

I agree completely. They should review it as is. If they want to amend their score later to reflect improvements, that's fine. But for now, it should be reviewed in all of it's mediocre glory.

$40.00 for a crappy port. That's Capcom levels of insulting.

Oh, thanks. I completely forgot I wasn't going to support yet another overpriced Capcom Switch port.

Not worth triple-dipping for a lazy, $30 port.

Wish I had purchased this instead of Lovecraft's Untold Stories. That game is a mess.

I wasn't interested much before.

I'm sure as Hell not interested now.

I want to be surprised that Capcom will charge $30 for this. I really want to.

@Lemmy_the_Koopa
I am not expecting any new Capcom games on the Switch any time soon. It seems content to keep dumping rereleases on Switch owners.

@Terrible_Majesty
Totally expecting it now.

What's the point? This one game will probably cost as much as the HD collection released on every other system. Only an idiot would bother buying the game under such circumstances.

I just do not understand Capcom.

@Ralizah
I know. I'm referring to the issues they had with the Switch version at PAX East, notably the massive frame rate drops. I hope the issue is resolved for release but I have little faith it will be.

I don't know why, but I have a feeling the Switch version is going to be released in a far worse state than the other versions.

Well, that is disappointing. If I want a Warriors-esque game, I have plenty of other options available to me on the Switch.