Comments 143

Re: Talking Point: What Makes A Good Sidequest, Anyway?

Cordyceps

@Cashews Oh yeah we're totally on the same page. Even on the minus 2-3 scale.

I grew up in the golden era when everything squaresoft and enix did was great. The merger is the classic example of the whole being less than the sum of its parts. And they thread the nostalgia so heavy that fans think there's a Renaissance going due to... remaking all the golden era games?

I've been disappointed in their output for a long time, to the point that I kind of do gleefully relish in their expectations not being met. I feel like they, as a company, outright lie and retcon themselves, just like they constantly retcon their games... and always get a pass.

There's a long story I'll skip, But I recently started Live a Live. I can understand why that game didn't come over here before. It is across-the-board a 5 at best. Lower mids. But reviews? 8s and 9s, some say it's a "masterpiece".

But really, it's the fan base that is the worst. Rational discourse is impossible there because they just attack you when your opinion isn't what "it is supposed to be". The company and their games have become so core to these people's personalities that they can't even handle a difference of opinion.

I mean, when the merger happened and they went in their new direction of "identity crisis is our identity!$$$!", I went through a really weird phase of not knowing what to do as a gamer, and I pretty much stopped gaming for 15 years based on how bad that era (ps3) was. The pandemic brought me back and... shock really. But, yeah, I mean, I found other stuff to do with my life. Which I feel is much better than the alternative which is being one of their current cult members.

Out of curiosity, I was reading some stuff on square-enix the other day, and their top competitors are Ubisoft, EA, and all of these other huge studios. And I'm, like, when did this happen? They used to compete with Atlus and NIS!

They're not AAA material at all.

Re: Talking Point: What Makes A Good Sidequest, Anyway?

Cordyceps

@Cashews So I'm wondering if you think (like I do) that there is a certain degree of positive bias towards square enix on these sites?

And yeah, I do agree with you. This feels like a veiled reaction piece to a game that isn't even on this platform.

Re: Percentage Of Female Managers At Nintendo Hasn't Improved, Despite Pledges

Cordyceps

Just gonna say in a capitalist society like we have, at the end of the day only the quality of the product matters to the average consumer.

I'm pretty sure the majority of us have figured out that these diversity programs and the like are just lip service from the company the same way they deal with pride month. It's a statement of alleviation.

Under the light for X issue?
Say we're committed to Y to solve X.
World keeps turning. Lather, rinse, repeat.

Re: UK Charts: For Goodness Sake, Zelda: TOTK Is Number One Again

Cordyceps

I mean, the overall game play for Zelda has indeed changed, but it's got all the core DNA. You're still Link, saving Hyrule from Ganon with the power of the TriForce. There's a princess Zelda. But The Thing I always got from the series was they're kind of telling the same legend, It just differs based on who and where you are when you ask. I did that backwards but you know what I mean.

It did adopt the open world format to kind of evolve with the times but that's where I think the big difference is between franchises.

Zelda, even though it's on dated hardware, is at the front of the pack, giving people what they really want and tons of it. Some diehard fans are meh, but most love it.
FF has a VERY divided fanbase.

Even on the most top of the line hardware on the market right now, many reviews point out the dated design elements. (Shuffling arena to arena, empty open spaces, little reward for exploration) For me, for a while, i felt like final fantasy chases tails more than innovates and it resonates now.

But yes my score would soften if it wasn't attached to the franchise. I think everybody would have some kind of a different score if it wasn't attached to the franchise. Especially if they launched a new IP. There's always room for growth on the ground floor, but 16 entries deep? Just reboot it already. The Identity crisis extends far beyond Cloud at this point.

Sorry, something just exploded That wasn't supposed to so this is probably all over the place and only semi-coherent

Gotta go

Re: UK Charts: For Goodness Sake, Zelda: TOTK Is Number One Again

Cordyceps

@EarthboundBenjy As an old school final fantasy fan, FF16 has no appeal to me at all and I will never purchase it.
It's an action game, it's not even an rpg.

And honestly, I don't know who they were trying to sell this to.
The final fantasy brand is huge but overall meaningless now. They will slap that name on anything.

Re: You're In For A Treat With Upcoming Hack 'N' Slash Title 'Death Or Treat'

Cordyceps

Yeah i'm with it.
I still need to grab have a nice death as well.
I think I'm gonna Plunge into the "roguelicks" (sic) because it's just a game that lets you keep progress after dying. Shuffling the board is okay, pattern recognition can't be everything.

But this has the proper aesthetics for sure. And I happen to be a fan of both HK and Ori

Re: UK Charts: Unsurprisingly, Final Fantasy XVI Knocks Zelda: TOTK Down A Peg

Cordyceps

@Keyblade-Dan Those certainly are all words.
Maybe use some punctuation once in a while.

It's not a final fantasy. it has minimal rpg elements, no party system, BS skill tree, Enemies don't have elemental weaknesses? There's no status effects? The dungeons and dragons influence that defines the series is completely gone. Nice trash mobs THAT JUST STAND THERE.

A correction - Final fantasy hasn't been "turned based" since the NES. They use the active time battle system from FFIV onwards.
However every final fantasy has utilized some sort of menu system for Issuing commands as though you were a general marshaling troops. (Like 12 or 13) Until now.

The big changes in the series happened after the series creator left the company and it became corporate property. Fans have been saying ever since the series has lost its way and they still say that.

The 1st 10 games under sakaguchi are definitively final fantasy and the same with tons of similar elements.They didn't start going off the rails with innovation until the man in charge left and corporate had no idea what to do anymore.

Now you guys pretty much nod your head and agree that final fantasy is whatever corporate says it is.

But It's not.

Kingdom Hearts has final fantasy spell names and summons. Is it a final fantasy or is it kingdom hearts?

Basically, the argument boils down to how high your standards are or if you just swallow every pill they hand you.

This looks and plays more like stranger to paradise part two so why is it called final fantasy sixteen? They can't even keep track of what makes a main line entry and what makes a spin off any more other than sales expectations.

The problem is final fantasy used to innovate and spearheaded a genre. Ever since the merger they chase tails and claim they are being innovative just for copying other people and introducing the systems to their much more popular games. FF16 is the witcher ripoff and SoP was the Souls attempt. All mids compared to the other "sourced" games.

I mean if you like it that's fine, but don't come out here Trying to say this is peak Final fantasy unless you want people to think you're a clown.

Liking something is great, loving it is even better, but that type of self serving hyperbole does no good for anyone.