Comments 208

Re: Talking Point: Do We Still Need Review Scores?

Balladeer

Wow. I quite like scores, perhaps because I’m a numberish fellow myself; but frankly a lot of the comments have made me see the value of scoreless reviews. I understand those who’d only read a summary to give themselves minimal spoilers, but those who proudly say they don’t read the review at all? That means that not only do they not appreciate at all what games journalists actually put the effort into (the writing), it also means they don’t understand why that score’s been given. The score is only an opinion, and without knowing why that opinion exists, how can you tell if the points the reviewer likes are the same as those you will? I find that ludicrous.

I also see reviewers getting a lot of flack for the scores they award from people who haven’t read, or don’t care about, why they awarded that score. Not to mention the pressure to compare your score against EVERY SINGLE GAME that’s got a higher or lower score before some muppet chirps up, ‘OMG U gave dis less than ur colleague gave Zelda the Flute of Flatulence ur carp @ riting!!!’ In summary, if I were a reviewer, I’d want my reviews to be scoreless.

I do quite like scores though, so long as by reading the review I can see where they came from. But they’re not necessary.

Re: Review: Bomber Crew (Switch eShop)

Balladeer

I have nothing to say on the game, but that’s an excellent Squadron Commander Flasheart reference in the subtitle! ‘Any woman willing to chain herself to my railings and suffragette movement gets my vote.’

Re: Rumour: New GameStop Listing Reveals Wolfenstein: Youngblood For Switch

Balladeer

STOP PUBLISHING LEAKS IN HEADLINES ON E3 DAY

The best way to discover this, if it happens at E3, is at E3. If this is a surprise for later, it’s killed. If it’s not, you lose nothing by publishing tomorrow instead, or keeping the game title in the body of the article and out of the front page.

Leak culture in gaming is a problem. Please, chaps, please be part of the solution.

Re: Rumour: Netflix And YouTube Are Coming To Switch According To Retail Leak

Balladeer

I’m thinking that, news site or no, leaks (if that’s what this is) shouldn’t be being published as article headlines this close to E3.

Fortunately I don’t care about this one, but it might have been a great moment for some to see come up in the Direct. It’s much less enjoyable to experience it first in headline form. Sorry Dom, but I think ‘Retail Leak Suggests New Services Coming to Switch’ would have been less spoileriffic. Poor show.

Re: Review: Nihilumbra (Switch eShop)

Balladeer

@roadrunner343 It’s a fair point. Looking back, that 9/10 seemed to acknowledge the simplistic puzzles but not be as harsh on them, and consider the narration (which the reviewer back then quickly silenced) as genuinely good rather than trying too hard. Then, of course, it was on a console with a more slender line-up, especially its eShop, and there wasn’t the smart device value point.

I see the validity of both: however, I would have appreciated Mitch at least mentioning why the gulf existed. Does he understand why the previous review gave the score it did? Does he think the points are valid? It’s the same site, I think that merits at least a little consistency mention.

Re: Review: Little Nightmares: Complete Edition (Switch)

Balladeer

@Switch_will_fail Depends. Does the text back up the critic's point of view? Can they spin a good argument as to why they think The Witcher 3 is worth a 1/10 (reductio ad absurdum aside)? Because that's what the vast majority of the comments seem to overlook. They focus on the numbers, or on one criticism the reviewer made out of many. I think the text backs up the score well enough.

The number on its own absolutely shouldn't scare people away from Little Nightmares. If people think some of the points that made the critic award that number will reduce the fun they have? That's a different story.

'Taste' is subjective as all hell.

Re: Review: Little Nightmares: Complete Edition (Switch)

Balladeer

Goodness me, the comments on this thing! 'The reviewer's subjective opinion disagrees with other people's subjective opinions, ergo he must be wrong!'

I'm presuming that most of the complainers haven't read the whole review. It's specifically stated near the beginning that the lack of sympathy for the protagonist made the stakes feel lower than they should have done for such a thing. A subjective comment, sure, but evidence that it's not 'just the loading times' that resulted in the 6/10. (That's not to mention 'spongey controls, unclear environments and ropey collision detection' - fairly damning for a puzzle-platformer, no?) The text matches up with the number in tone, which is what really matters.

More and more reviewers now are reverting to simpler scoring mechanisms, because they think people focus too much on the numbers and not enough on the words that they actually put the effort into. I hope this doesn't happen on Ninty Life, because I actually like the numbers; but from the comments here, I wouldn't be surprised if it did.

Re: Shuntaro Furukawa Is Nintendo's New President

Balladeer

Will Furukawa make funny Nintendo Direct appearances? This is obviously the most important question. Sure, Kimishima may have presided over a period of much-needed stability, but did he ever wear amusing hats or look at bananas in an odd way? No. No he did not.

Re: Action RPG Die for Valhalla! Will Raid The Switch eShop Next Month

Balladeer

This sounded right up my street and I got all excited... then I saw the word ‘roguelike’.

It is my considered opinion that algorithms will not match a developer’s own touches where level design is concerned, not until the machines rise up anyway. So by the time I actually want to play a roguelike, I’ll be enslaved by the Master AI and a bit too busy for videogames.