Comments 178

Re: YouTuber Gets Banned From Site For Streaming Super Mario Odyssey

krvstkvlt

@ThanosReXXX @Bobby_earl I do think the retailer is at fault for selling the game, but not for getting the guy banned. Two seperate issues in my opinion. So to answer your question: yes, the retailer should be punished (by a fine or something).

The YouTuber can't be hiding behind the 'it shouldn't been sold to me' logic though. Just stay offline, play the game, don't try to be a show off or deal with the consequences.

To keep with the BMW car example: The BMW dealer should get a fine for selling a car pre-release but can't be blamed for the stupid thing the driver does with it.

EDIT to react to your last reply: I admit I shouldn't assume he's a show off. I take back those words. BUT... he still should know it isn't smart to stream an unreleased product.

Re: YouTuber Gets Banned From Site For Streaming Super Mario Odyssey

krvstkvlt

@ThanosReXXX Isn't everyone responsible for their own actions? I mean, it's bad for the retailer to sell the game too early but the guy couldv'e just played it and didn't tell anyone and enjoy the game.

The guy clearly wanted to be a show off with a product that isn't to be out yet. That's not Nintendo's fault, that's not the retailers fault. Ofcourse it's because of the retailer that he was able to do that, but that doesn't make it their fault. Would you blame BMW for selling me a car when I do a hit-and-run? I mean, they gave me a car so it's their fault I didn't something with it I'm not allowed to do. That doesn't make sense.

Re: Soapbox: Stardew Valley is a Perfect Fit for the Nintendo Switch

krvstkvlt

@Hughesy It's a problem on all consoles, based on how the game is ported. They're working on it, as 20 seconds are way too long and they know it. The fact they know it, made them put in a message that says it takes a bit to save.

I mean, a couple of seconds of saving aren't that bad but 20+ is clearly a problem.