Comments 285

Re: Anniversary: Nintendo Is 135 Years Old Today

TheSaneInsanity

"Companies aren't your friend." Streamers aren't your friend either, neither are content creators, but they still can be good people with flaws. Companies are masses of people, who may or may not deserve congratulations for their hard work. People with hopes and dreams, flaws and crimes, all together trying to make something special.

People tell you the company isn't your friend is the same way a parent might tell you nobody on the internet is your friend, and neither are the majority of people you meet on the street, that doesn't stop them from being important or good people. There are friends on the internet, but I can agree that saying something equivalent of a house for people is your friend is insane. We live in a world of 8 billion.... let's just get along.

Happy anniversary to all the people inside Nintendo!

Re: Nintendo And Pokémon File Lawsuit Against Palworld Developer Pocketpair

TheSaneInsanity

Patents mean methods, not the end result like copyright is meant to protect. Patents I think also use include trade secrets or encryption, my opinion is that though palworld is questionable, they exploited the law just enough to avoid copyright, but if somebody on the team copied trade secrets or encryption keys... first why tf would you copy that if you can code, second they deserve it 100 % if so instead of 80%... If it's code or mechanics... Good luck getting that to stick, code is copyright, and mechanics don't fall under copyright , trademarks, or patents as far as I know

From Wikipedia:
A patent is a type of intellectual property that gives its owner the legal right to exclude others from making, using, or selling an invention for a limited period of time in exchange for publishing an enabling disclosure of the invention.[1] In most countries, patent rights fall under private law and the patent holder must sue someone infringing the patent in order to enforce their rights

Re: Splatoon 3's 'Grand Festival' Splatfest Kicks Off Tomorrow, Which Team Gets Your Vote?

TheSaneInsanity

Here we stand, in an endless, past, present, future span.
Our wishes are the flames that light up history.
We've come far, you and I, on our journey.
Sights and sounds, highs and lows, all that we've seen.
Nothing at the start, at the void of night.
But then out there, in the dark, a path came to light.
Did you think back then we'd be here? Guiding others in our shoes?
Tiny, tiny seeds, left on the trail, someday to bloom.
Star at night, glowing bright, bringing us your light-
A message to us from far in the past, saying, "Shine on!"
Words you write, line by line, showing us your sights-
Passed down to us so we sing them today, we feel you still.
Team past. History.

Re: First Minecraft Movie Trailer Features Creepers, Piglins And Jack Black's Steve

TheSaneInsanity

I like how the creatures are designed, the wolf in the thumbnail and the llama in particular... I think the human cast is colorful.... but I haven't seen enough world interaction to determine whether this is will be good.

If the humans can't interact with the world like ingame... I'm out.

Also the creatures would look way better if their models were allowed to clip. I know that's considered bad, but the continous softbody skin brings the excellent texture work down a peg, plus that's how it works ingame.

Re: FromSoftware Boss Wouldn't Allow Studio Layoffs To Happen, Cites Satoru Iwata

TheSaneInsanity

Good words work better with proper dandori. I think from software has three options, make smaller indie like games so that they have the budget to fail, with the potential to profit... This is the warchest approach where less spending is good. The second is to make a big AAA game and hope it sells well. This is what most AAA publishers are doing... and I don't think it works very well.

What nintendo does is make games that they think will succeed alongside games they want to make, so that they can be pleasantly surprised and well as sustained. I think I'd reccoment this approach, as sustainability comes before making what you want, even if making what you want is the end goal. Funny how surprise and delight works in their business model.

Re: Nintendo's Updated Guidelines For Tournaments & Content Creation Sparks Community Backlash

TheSaneInsanity

@HeadPirate

What happened was that there were abuse scandals and Nintendo hates mods because they interfere with the original creative vision (They don't hate fans lol).

You also said that Nintendo can't take down every tournament or copyright violation... but they can at least take down any that exist online, Music detection systems are very powerful, that's why they were able to put out these guidelines, they do turn a blind eye.

It's not a fantasy to fight for rights to use things we own, I do not live In LaLaland, If I was I would be suggesting that Nintendo allow piracy. I believe that copyright needs limits to how far it can control users. Things like taking videos and posting what they play, hosting events, even right to repair, which many companies use copyright and voiding warranties to fight. We do not enter contracts when we buy food, a wrench, or a puzzle (closest comparison to creative works I can think of). We can film these things, host events that involve them. I know that the public performance laws for copyright outright prohibit these things for games and other forms of media. Posting Elsa's Let it go should not happen, but having a video be taken down because it was playing in the background of something different, I could see fair use being extended. People even abuse copyright to cover up evidence of abuse (See Police using it prevent filming Brutality)

Many people claim fair use when backed into a corner with copyright, that's the only thing they do really.

I don't believe I have a strong enough arguement for modding. So I won't bother with that.

Re: Nintendo's Updated Guidelines For Tournaments & Content Creation Sparks Community Backlash

TheSaneInsanity

(replacing old message to add context to convo, otherwise I'm peacing out)@sanderev preventing piracy is protecting sales, controlling a tournament is not protecting sales at least for people who actually know a thing or two about how brands work, for people who can't tell their brands from their behinds, it is protecting sales.
My issue is that controlling how a user uses your expression is not a form of protection offered for most forms of expression (Look at people quoting eachother out of context on twitter, unregulated.). So that is a reason I disagree that games should have the same protection. that is a form of me disagreeing with it, I'm sure I can find others if I'm pressed.

Re: Nintendo's Updated Guidelines For Tournaments & Content Creation Sparks Community Backlash

TheSaneInsanity

@HeadPirate IP holders shouldn't have rights to control users. Only to protect sales. And this is control of how the game itself is used. If one doesn't follow guidelines, Nintendo enforces copyright instead of turning a blind eye. I don't think they should have rights to turn a blind eye sometimes, and enforce other times. It's too messy.

An aside regarding modification and fanwork, I only have beliefs here, that only modifications that replace existing works should be struck down. I do not think this part is strong enough to debate, as it is not wholly definitive. Please respond to the first part instead.