Comments 1,535

Re: Review: Ghost Blade HD (Wii U eShop)

KeeperBvK

@leemeyer26

I second @Kilroy 's sentiment. This has to be THE worst review I've ever read here. It tells me absolutely nothing at all about the game aside from it being a shoot em up. How about next time you're reviewing a Mario game you just keep on babbling how you move around and jump in the game, making it a good platformer?

Ugh. That first paragraph alone. You obviously have no clue when stating shmup would be another term for bullet sprayers.

And what about you prasing the training mode? Just about any shmup has that!

Re: Review: Pirate Pop Plus (Wii U eShop)

KeeperBvK

Playing the game at Gamescom I thought it was incredibly boring. Within the first few minutes I'd start to rack up combos, upgrading my arsenal and literally destroying everything on screen in no time without ANYTHING breaking up the repetition.

Re: Feature: Exploring the Licensed Content in RCMADIAX Games on the Wii U and New 3DS eShop

KeeperBvK

"Titles like BLOK DROP U and more recently SUPER ROBO MOUSE, among others, seem to have no such content."

I love how BLOK DROP U is always cited as a positive exception from this guy's norm and how people praised teh game upon its initial release, yet the game is a carbon copy of an early smartphone game, merely replacing the once cute visual assets with...barely anything to look at. So in a way that game was even worse than these recent officially licensed games in how he just took another guy's game without even acknowledging it.

Re: Review: Prism Pets (Wii U eShop)

KeeperBvK

@MitchVogel 20148 was the "it" game of 2014? It got many clones? Clones that tried to capitalize off of 2048?
sigh
When are you finally going to do at least some tiny research before building up an entire article on such nonsense?
2048 IS a clone. It is one of those games that unashamedly capitalized on another team's ideas and hard work.
Threes is the original game, developed over the course of months, while 2048 has been slapped together in a weekend by some jerk.

Re: Review: Sweetest Thing (Wii U eShop)

KeeperBvK

@Dankykong More like Cranky Kong, eh? Looks like you're only one complaining about NL reviewing every download game, while most other people agree that this is the single best aspect of the whole site. Why do you even come here when complaining about what even made the site so popular over the last ten years?
It's not their fault some (or many) of the games are bad and occasionally some of theose alleged bad games turn out to be decent surprises. Also, what else would you like the staff to do? Review good games we already know are good? Wow, big difference.

Re: Review: Tachyon Project (Wii U eShop)

KeeperBvK

@Humphries90 Nobody cares that you've apparently also done reviews on pretty much all the download games reviewed here. Just post your opinion instead of repeating your "I did a review of this too." line over and over and over. It doesn't provide any additional information or makes your point more valid. Just state your opinion and we'll know that you've played the game.

Re: Minecraft Has Become the Ninth Best-Selling Game on the Japanese eShop

KeeperBvK

@MitchVogel What a horrible news. Not the content is necessarily horrible, but the news itself. How it was written. You know what a decent writer/journalist would have done? Give context when it's as relevant as it is here.
The only reason Minecraft is in the ninth spot is because there are barely any games on the Japanese eshop because Nintendo used to have this strict rule where a developer/publisher would have to have an office in Japan to be eligible of releasing a game on the eshop.
Hence there are WAY less games out there than in the West.

The way you have overblown this news by not giving out necessary information, people are going "Oh, wow, such a tremendous success" as can be seen in the comments.

Nice way of creating misinformation there. Not the first time either.

Re: Review: Pocky & Rocky with Becky (Wii U eShop / GBA)

KeeperBvK

Wow, this is a pretty badly written review, sorry.

Somebody who proclaims "after over 25 years of gaming, his love of Nintendo is no longer just a phase." should at least show SOME sign of recognizing that this is just an entry in a series of games. Yet you are giving us no context whatsoever. From your review I can't tell whether it's any different from the prequels or whether you simply didn't like the flow and style. Don't you have anybody on your team who could compare this to the prequels?

Re: Review: Perpetual Blast (Wii U eShop)

KeeperBvK

@ reviewer: "Perpetual Blast is an endless shooter. [...] The idea of Perpetual Blast is simple: find and destroy 100 boxes as fast as you can."

This makes zero sense. How is it an endless shooter when there is a clear goal you are supposed to reach within as little time as possible?

Re: Review: G.G Series SCORE ATTACKER (DSiWare)

KeeperBvK

@MitchVogel "Gameplay is typical of the bullet hell arcade shooter genre, borrowing heavily from titles such as Galaga or Xevious."

Those are NOT bullet hell shooters. Bullet hell shooters or danmakus are a very special subset of shoot 'em ups. Please get your facts straight. I remember this site already having called just about any shmup a bullet hell shooter on numerous occasions and it's sad. How about calling Project Cars a kart racer? Or Yoshi's Wooly World a 3D platformer?

Now I have no idea how this game actually plays, so for all I know it might be a bullet hell shooter. I can't argue with that. But calling Galaga and Xevious danmakus? Sorry, that's just plain wrong. Danmakus hadn't existed until the mid 90s when games like Batsugun or Donpachi made first babysteps into danmaku territory. By your definition every single shmup would be a danmaku and I could hardly imagine a shmup with less bullets than Galaga.

On another note: When reviewing a shmup, referencing Galaga and Xevious is a bad move anyways. Those two are already vastly different from another and naming just those two granddaddies makes it seem like you simply have no clue of the whole genre, merely bringing up two games you might have played years back.