HollowGrapeJ

@Heavyarms55 I can understand that. Some people feel at ease knowing there's only one console to choose and that they'll focus on that. With the Pro and One X, we're seeing improvements to current games along with higher resolutions. Something that wouldn't have been possible if we waited who knows how long for the next fully fledged consoles. It's beneficial for the future too. Playing these games later on are gonna look much better than some people remember, haha.

@Retsam The good thing is that you still don't have to upgrade to the mid-gen consoles. I want an Xbox One X, but I'm not mad that I just have a PS4 Slim. A lot of people seem to be against these upgraded consoles because they feel that they're required to buy it even though they know that they can still play the games. It's very weird to me. I don't understand. Lots of technology is "outdated" all the time. New phones, new laptops, etc. It's not much different.

@Heavyarms55 I personally like the idea of mid-cycle upgraded consoles and I even believe Microsoft said they wanted to bridge the gap between generations. I wish they did this last gen to be honest.

@Heavyarms55 The way I see it, Sony needs to play to their strengths. They're doing fine with a regular console. They don't necessarily need to "innovate". What Sony has always done better than Nintendo is take a more simplistic approach.

The basic box that plays games is what Sony has always had, it's always what brought people over. They don't mind that.

Play Mario Party with your family. I promise you, it'll be fun. (Disclaimer: may cause arguments or destroyed relationships)

@sleepinglion I'll miss some of the SEGA characters like Gum and Ulala. But, I'll be pretty content with the Sonic characters if they give it enough content.

Why didn't the Switch just get Farming Simulator 19? I knew something was off when this had a different name...

@sleepinglion More like, it would be like Nintendo only using Mario characters in Mario Kart.

@Painay Do you really think you can race Sonic if he's not in a car?

@ritouf I mainly went physical too since I love the little game cards. But, I find digital more convenient for the Switch, so I might get a big micro-sd card and use the eShop.

@ritouf What about retail titles?

This always has to happen when I'm broke.

Mortal Kombat 11? The Outer Worlds? Joker in Smash? Yes. I am hyped. Especially for Joker.

Since they already established the new characters into the last game, this one should give them a bit more freedom. I see Shao Khan is back, so that's a start.

It doesn't run that good on the other platforms, so I didn't have much hope the Switch version would either. Just get the game on your platform of choice and live with it, I guess.

@TriforceBun If they did that, it would def be Adults Only meaning it can't release on consoles at all. Though, some costumes do come pretty close. There's always mods if anyone wants to do that.

I'm not sure what to expect from it. But, I'll tune it.

Putting those Joy-cons to good use. Thanks, Nintendo.

@Silly_G That might become a priority after DOA 6 is done with.

@berga89 I know, I'm not talking about them.

Panic Button does a very awesome job getting as much as they can out of the Switch to get ports to work. They make compromises that make sense. But, too many people are beginning to look at them as the default option for any game that devs can't be bothered with instead of a team just wanting to get certain games on the platform.

@IHateTombs The reception for it hasn't been too good on the PlayStation side either, trust me.

@Agramonte It's $59.99 on the eShop for me.

@alpha5099 You definitely have to. I personally enjoy Warriors Orochi 3 Ultimate more than Hyrule Warriors. Although, it's still great too.

Looks like a major glow up from the first game.

I'll be really happy if this comes to the west. If not, there's always the original version on PS4 for anyone interested.

Guys, obviously a mobile game is going to be more limited in terms of what they can do. Almost every game has to be designed around touch screen controls and work across a vast majority of phones that aren't even that powerful.

In terms of price, the mobile market is very different than consoles. Most people do not even want to pay $10 for phone games when they're used to free to play. A lot of these games implement microtransactions and ads to push you to actually spend some money and make up the profit.

Releasing a $20 game on the mobile store would be suicide. It's already hard enough as it is trying to get consumers to move on from free to play. A lot of people complain about the quality of mobile games, yet a lot of them would probably find even $9.99 absurd. Some developers would love to offer a better experience for mobile. But, it's a big risk to take. They have to be able to be profitable.

"This is our first foray into dedicated game consoles, so we are very anxious and super nervous. It took our team a long time, dedication and hard work, and overcoming unforeseen difficulties, and constant changes to get to this point."

^ They are finally taking the step to getting on a console and they're trying to work with what they can. And the first thing you see is people in this comment section already writing them off. This is why mobile gaming is the way it is.

@Joe-b Why do you say that?

@Heavyarms55 Nintendo will respond to the PS5 the exact same way they are with the PS4 right now.

@goggles789 Nintendo does a pretty good job with the "Featured" section though. They tend to show off a lot of neat indie games that sometimes I might have overlooked alongside their bigger titles.

I remember A Hat in Time coming out on consoles and I was pretty excited and looked for it in the PS Store. It wasn't anywhere to be found which was confusing. I didn't find it until after manually typing it in and I was like "Ah... Okay then."

They do a better job hiding the shovelware, sure. Though, it's pretty crazy to think how some indie games can be affected like that by the way they manage things.

Now, watch when it comes out on the Switch. I can almost say for sure it'll be featured and getting more attention. I definitely give Nintendo props for helping the smaller guys.

@goggles789 Cheap looking shovelware is on literally every console. Only difference is it sticks out more on the Switch because Nintendo doesn't try to hide it as much like the PlayStation store for example.

I'm gonna be the odd one here and say it's something original and not another game we might be expecting.

What annoys me is that Sony could have done something so much better with the Vita. Screen is great, hardware is much better than 3DS, but it was just wasted. It's like they didn't care. And, then there was the proprietary memory to make matters worse.

@Agramonte I can understand price being an issue for some people with older ports. But, I just think you are not looking at things realistically if you expect the Switch to be the place for new AAA games.

If Switch is somebody's only console, then sure. I know how it feels to some people to want games and not be able to have em because I used to be Nintendo-only. But, I now know that it's pretty much pointless to hope for that and move to other platforms if I want those games.

But, even still, the Switch is doing better than the Wii U did with it's support. Even if I don't buy the games, I love every time the Switch gets ports of games like this. You wouldn't expect full third party from Nintendo consoles, but it's still offering some things to the table and that's a good thing.

@Agramonte You wouldn't have bought it on the Switch even if it was new knowing you.

@Agramonte

This is from 2014. Hah, you were so concerned with turning this into something negative that you didn't even get it right.

I wouldn't say it's so much that they don't care. But, Nintendo Switch isn't a platform most people go to for "graphics and realism". I understand the compromises needed to get some games on there and I'm okay with that. But, that doesn't mean I always like the tons of random 2D games I pass by on the eShop.

@Mr_Pepperami Tbh, even if they gave us the online the last gen versions have, I wouldn't mind as I don't really care for the online. Others might have an issue though. Either way, I'd love GTA V on Switch.

@GrailUK I can definitely see Switch support being better next year. It's already proved itself successful, so developers who were skeptical about it might be making preparations.

I hope we get more neat ports. I was glad to see Saints Row The Third announced for it. 😃

@JR150 That's not surprising though. Xbox always has it rough over there.

@Mr_Pepperami I can see the single player for GTA V not being much of an issue as we did already get the game on last gen. Online has changed a lot though. They increased the player count and they don't support the last gen versions anymore which would likely be what a Switch version would be based off of.

@Sac_instead You want a Nintendo game to drop that low? Good luck with that one.

With Smash and Pokemon, this holiday is looking better than ever to get a Switch.

@patbacknitro18 That sounds kinda funny considering Pauline came way before she did.

I think it looks pretty great coming from the 3DS games. But, I really think the Switch is capable of more than this.

I don't know her, but she's cute. So, I approve.

@Ryu_Niiyama Well, in that case, I agree! Pretty underrated game. Yeah, it needs more love.

"A man who never eats pork bun is never a whole man!"

Hahahaha. And you wonder why Sakurai doesn't want to do another story.

@Ryu_Niiyama I've never played it, but I can't really say I agree. That game made me so disappointed I didn't even bother getting it. The final product looked like a completely different game from what I was getting hyped for and I will never forgive them for it.

Ports like these are where the Switch can really shine. It's decent enough to be able to run games like this with even more polish than the last gen versions with the bonus of being portable.

"You make for a quite a good lookin' gal!"