Comments 1,783

Re: Around 1,000 People Worked On The New Pokémon Games For Switch

Dezzy

A lot of that is probably just the difficulty of quickly upscaling a team. Once they get used to making HD games as the norm, they'll probably optimise their team a bit and reduce the number of people.
1000 is way too much for something like this. Breath of the Wild had fewer people.

Re: Fire Emblem: Three Houses Patch Revises Sensitive Dialogue

Dezzy

@WynnThornton

The problem with your definition is that it fails to account for the fact that very large organisations are made up multiple entities and groups of people, that are often in competition with one another, or at least have different interests.
If you're saying that Nintendo can't censor Nintendo because it's technically the same group, then you're also committed to saying the US government can't censor the US government because it's the same group. So if the US president told the EPA they can't release climate change data to the public, you would have to say that it doesn't count as censorship. They are both just part of the government, and therefore it doesn't count.
Hopefully you'd see why that would be disingenuous. That WOULD be censorship. It's only NOT censorship if they're part of the same interest group and have the same intentions. The legal organisation they belong to is less meaningful.

Re: Fire Emblem: Three Houses Patch Revises Sensitive Dialogue

Dezzy

@JayJ

If you haven't noticed how debate on the internet works: People redefine words so it only applies to situations where they agree/disagree with it or not.
In the case of censorship, a lot of people redefine it post-hoc so it's only censorship if they dislike what's been done. If they agree with it, it magically never counts as censorship.