Comments 366

Re: Watch_Dogs Pushed Back to Spring 2014

cookiex

@rjejr

I'm pretty sure the Wii U version is far enough in development that it would make no sense to cancel it. Besides, by the time the game comes out Wii U's install base will be a lot bigger than right now so the delay could prove benefitial.

Re: Watch_Dogs Pushed Back to Spring 2014

cookiex

Untitled

I was really looking forward to this game, and it's a loss that it's not coming out this year (not just to Wii U but all next-gen platforms, since I believe this was among the most hyped of the games coming). At least the extra development time will allow for a better game, and more polish for all versions.

Re: Zelda: Wind Waker HD Release Triggers 685% Increase In UK Wii U Hardware Sales

cookiex

@Peach64

Oh really now? A couple of hundred a week? Here I see that in the last week of September it sold 1.2k:
http://www.vgchartz.com/weekly/41546/UK/
685% of that number is approximately 8,2k. If the number turns out to be 8.2k, then it will be the highest weekly sales number of the system in the UK since December.

That is more than four times the estimated Wii U sales when Pikmin 3 came out...
http://www.vgchartz.com/weekly/41483/UK/

...and almost double the amount of when MH3 came out.
http://www.vgchartz.com/weekly/41357/UK/

Sure, one could argue that it's just an initial rush, and it's not that much in the grand scheme of things, so it remains to be seen if there's any momentum to keep.

Re: Assassin's Creed IV DLC Looks Set to Sail Past Wii U

cookiex

All I've read is that Wii U won't have season pass, which AC III didn't have either yet we got all non-Sony exclusive DLC in the end. I suggest we wait for Ubisoft to clarify this.

Ubisoft hasn't left out Wii U before so I don't know why they'd start now.

Re: Soapbox: Nintendo Could Have Ruled The Micro-Console Market With Wii

cookiex

" I think that Nintendo has abandoned its previous console — assuming Western territories follow suit, which seems likely — much too soon. Walk into your local video game store and there are still rows of Wii titles, suggesting that a healthy demand for software still exists — despite the fact that no new games are coming."

So? They can still sell them just as before. Wii U is perfectly capable of playing every retail Wii game out there, provided that you have the necessary controls and accesories. You may argue the lack of GC support, but A) the controller is not mandatory for any Wii game I know of and B) more recent hardware revisions of the Wii (Family Edition and Mini) already dropped that functionality anyway.

And don't get me started on how Wii's continuing existence has only further perpuated the confusion among casuals. Naming its successor like that was a terrible idea indeed, but its far too late to change that. However you could minimize the damage by getting rid of Wii systems from shelves and thus not make people buy Wii systems who will then try to play Wii U games on them. There is no harm in having it the other way around (only Wii games remain on shelves and people buy them to play on Wii U) 'cause as I said, Wii U is fully backwards compatible with them.

"Having a few AAA Wii titles in 2013 may well have helped Wii U owners get through the software drought which has impacted that machine."

Why would diverting resources to make new Wii titles do anything but further delay development of Wii U games? Nintendo even admits that they didn't have enough resources to keep a steady stream of Wii U titles coming (due to them underestimating the needs of HD development), which is a major reason the system is struggling. Wii U needs all the help it can get right now, and seeing Nintendo keep cranking out Wii titles would give existing Wii owners less of an incentive to upgrade.

"Nintendo should have been thinking of this approach years ago with the Wii. Instead of giving us the Wii Mini — the system no one wanted — Nintendo could have launched a super-cheap micro version which removes the disc drive and connects to a new and improved Wii Shop Channel."

A major difference between that and the PSVita TV is that the latter is in my view essentially a way to save the Vita by following the Android market and offering something the 3DS can't. Wii has done its course and doesn't need saving. You are correct that this should've happened years ago, but the key thing is that it didn't, since at the time there was no real market for it.

And I have to recite the problem with resources. Upgrading Wii Shop channel, putting every Wii game on digital and maintaining said infrastructure would take away resources Wii U (and to a small extent 3DS) desperately needs.

"Such a move would have allowed Nintendo to maintain the Wii's popularity with developers, too; a cheap micro-console with motion control would provide the perfect breeding ground for innovative indie studios, especially as Nintendo has now relaxed its indie development policies."

Wii U's future seems to be based on first/second-party titles and indies right now, and by giving the latter a concurrent non-portable system they can develop on isn't going to do Wii U any favors. Not to mention that the indie infastructure of Wii Shop would need to be re-tooled (which, again, need resources) since it wasn't that attractive to begin with.

"You can't hold onto the past forever, of course — and Nintendo's focus on making its current machines as successful as possible is commendable — but by closing the book on one of its most popular pieces of hardware so soon strikes me as a mistake."

It strikes me as a mistake that they hadn't closed that book earlier.

TL:DR I get the idea behind the article, but I think it would do more harm than benefit.

Re: US Retailer Lists Luigi's Mansion: Dark Moon For Wii U

cookiex

If it was coming this year Nintendo would've announced it by now.

I love Luigi's Mansion; Dark Moon, but I think WiiU would be much better off with a straight sequel (which I can see happening in a few years) as opposed to a port. Not that I believe this listing is legit anyway.

Re: Eiji Aonuma States Desire to Avoid the Limitations of Tradition in The Legend of Zelda Franchise

cookiex

"Something where it wouldn’t even matter if Zelda is actually a princess, or not."

Didn't they do something like that in Skyward Sword? I don't remember Zelda ever being referred to as a princess in that game, nor would it have mattered much if she was.

Since Zelda is my favourite VG franchise of all time, I hope whatever new direction they take with it is for the best.

Re: Nintendo Set To End Production of the Wii

cookiex

IMO this should've happened earlier. As long as both Wii and WiiU are in stores at the same time you're only going to perpetuate the confusion among casuals.

Still sad to see it go, though. It's brought a lot to the table in the industry.