Comments 31

Re: Hands On: Forget The Name, Square Enix's New Action RPG Is A Lovely HD-2D Take On SNES-Era Zelda

JJJAGUAR

@Kingy "I think including your protagonist's (or antagonist's) name in the title is actually the most common naming convention"
I highly doubt that, just look at any random big game list (like Steam most played), the amount of games with a character name on the title is never above 50%. Mentioning a dozen of examples don't mean much on a industry that releases 10k+ games every year.

Re: Hands On: Forget The Name, Square Enix's New Action RPG Is A Lovely HD-2D Take On SNES-Era Zelda

JJJAGUAR

@Kingy I never said Elliot was a bad choice for the protagonist name, but that's a totally different topic. You don't have to include the protagonist name on the game name, is actually not common to do it. Companies that do it usually do it because the character name also happen to be a marketeable name. You said people will short the whole name to just "Elliot", and like I said in the my previous message, I don't think that's gonna happen, but we will see.

"I don't think the food analogy works here because that would imply that the name is fundamentally flawed."
The analogy shows the point of view for people who criticize both the studio previous and the new game. You (and some other people here) asked why people didn't liked the name, and I explain it to you, for them those names ARE fundamentally flawed, but I didn't say they were "right". It's just an explanation for you to understand the point of view of the many people who don't like the name (and in marketing when so many people complain, it usually means something).

Re: Hands On: Forget The Name, Square Enix's New Action RPG Is A Lovely HD-2D Take On SNES-Era Zelda

JJJAGUAR

@Kingy I think I can provide an explanation of why people don't like the name, just please take into account that I don't really feel like turn this into an argument or something, is a subjective thing and is perfectly fine that you and some other people here like it. So I think there's 2 reason why some people don't like the name:
1-Sounds generic, there's countless of works that start with "The Adventures of" or similar, and the name "Elliot" is also pretty common.
2-It's long, people like names that are easy to remember, which is also good for marketing

Looking at your examples, in my opinion the only one that start with something as generic is Zelda, but there's at least 2 differences:
1-"Zelda" was and is an unique name, to the point that people usually refer to the franchise as just "Zelda". I don't think people will refer to this game as just "Elliot".
2-The first Zelda was released on 1986, when a name like that was less generic (same with some of your examples) and it also had no subtitle, your example is a sequel, it's more common for sequels to include subtitles to difference them.

About the study receiving criticism with their names, just think of it this way: if a restaurant undercooks food, they'll get complaints that it's raw, but if they overcook it, they'll get complaints that it's burnt—and in neither case is it the customers' fault. Some people think this name is going to one of the extremes, but as I said, it's subjective. There are many people in these comments who liked the name and that's fine. I just wanted to explain why some people didn't like it, since their opinion is also valid.

Re: Opinion: Not Enough People Are Talking About This Early GOTY Contender

JJJAGUAR

@Zufolobelisk If you are talking about the The Game Awards, then of course a niche game will never win it, since is a press popularity contest... But I don't see a single person in this thread (writer included) stating otherwise. The thing is, there's HUNDREDS of different GOTY awards, and popularity is not a factor on all of them. Everyone can have their opinion about the best games of the year, and for this writer (and me and many other who unlike you played the game) this is definitely among them.

Re: As Switch Closes The Gap, Sony Officially Confirms PS2 Has Sold "Over" 160 Million Units

JJJAGUAR

@sixrings I don't know what made you think that they need a 50% discount to break the record. We are talking about a console that have not reduced its price in EIGHT years, and yet it keep selling well. A 30% discount would be more than enough to sell some more millions. Btw if Nintendo don't discount their games often is because they keep selling well, but we are talking about the scenario when the Switch stop selling well, so a better comparison would be the Wii Mini, which released with a whopping 60% discount. Let's not forget Nintendo main income is software, they can easily sell hardware at a minimum price in order to gain users to sell more software. Of course they don't care about the record, but selling more Switches always means more money for them