maulinks

Yeah, and we will still be dependent on Discord solutions to play properly. I don't get how they didn't make voice chat communication a priority addition for this game

@Inaroomalone Switch consistently outsells PS4 and now PS5 in the US...

But for Europe, Sony was always very strong there, they invest very heavily in marketing in that region since the PS1 era. But Switch is doing very well in Europe, if you compare it to other Nintendo hardware and Xbox

Can we have the link to the full study?

@Chunkboi79 that was probably a difficult decision on the develoment team. To me, pokemon games should have 200 pokemon at the most, to allow the team to make the gameplay aspect excellent. The introduction of new pokemon with "generation" nas new starters became unsustainable over time and a nightmare for the development team.

I don't think the graphics were the problem with Sword and Shield, Pokemon was never about graphics, it was about feeling like going on and adventure and getting lost in a continent while collecting and training companions. And they based the animations on the previous games and improved them - that's how animation works.

Sword and Shield was bad because it was incredibly linear, there were no mazes in caves or complex routing, and the gameplay in the wild area feels a bit off. The story isn't the best either. But those are just my opinions.

To me, if they made the game like the remake of Links Awakening (graphically), very polished but with 2d perspective (not these Diamond and Pearl remakes which I don't think look good), it would be better.

On one hand we criticize companies for crunching their employees to working insanely overtime.

On the other, we want Pokemon Company to make a game with over 900 tridimensional models, both in battle and on the wild, with multiple combinations of moves, to look like Breath of the Wild.

We can't have both things.

In time: Nintendo is not the owner of Pokemon IP, that ownership is divided with The Pokemon Company, so it is not the sole responsible for decision making.

@NintendoKnight you do know that they WILL invest. So the improvement is in the future. Your comment makes no sense.

@nessisonett but its so underrated! extremely sad outcome as well, I really liked it. And its about the biggest impression

Love how Larry Butz is the favorite client as well

Original 3 Phoenix Wright games were so much fun

Let's be real guys, that "two weeks to make" replica looks like garbage. It does not look the same and definitely doesn't look better.

I'm not saying Pokemon Arceus looks incredible, but that replica looks terrible.

I LOVE THIS GAME SO MUCH

My god you can pet the s*** out of that dog hahahaha

I know the man is not doing so well but at least spell his name right

SILKSONG PLEASE

Including the graphics in the Cons column is completely out of place in my opinion - this is among the most impressive graphics you'll ever see on the nintendo switch - should be on the Pros column, honestly. This is the absolute benchmark in terms of ports to switch.

There are ALREADY graphics comparison online, and it looks excellent - I'm purchasing right away

He certainly knows a lot about the gaming industry, but he has very limited business sense. He is more like a blogger than a business opinion.

Sonic Forces would be acceptable if the physics on the 2d stages weren't so abysmal

Serious Nights Into Dreams vibes in here

Will pick up Silksong, but I'm losing faith on its release, we had no new information for a long time now. It's obviously the heavier title here.

Wonder what will be the operation model, if they're just going to centralize imports and provide with maintenance.

Seems prohibitive for nintendo to operate in a country without a manufacturing footprint and the tax structure Brazil has