Comments 707

Re: Review: Gun Gun Pixies - A Pitiful Perv-Fest That Also Fails As A Video Game

Dakotastomp

@BMOC Ask him for his opinion on Kill La Kill and I bet he would be just as uncomfortable with it as he is with this game. He could have just said the way they depict the characters is distasteful to him and I would get the point. He doesn't have to put down anyone interested in buying it buy saying It’s hard to believe anyone would choose to offend themselves with this kind of thing. It's clear that he doesn't like ecchi games, so he shouldn't review them.

And if this is what NL is going to be when it comes to reviewing games like this, then again, they need to either hire a reviewer who is more open on the subject or NEVER REVIEW THESE GAMES AGAIN. It's obvious that they don't like Ecchi, so they should stop reviewing them just for a joke. If it's not about kinkshaming, then give us the facts without the whole "perv-fest" mockery.

Re: Review: Gun Gun Pixies - A Pitiful Perv-Fest That Also Fails As A Video Game

Dakotastomp

@BMOC I'm not looking for approval for my love of oppai, I want people to shut up about "Ew, boobs in games!"

If you agree that it shouldn't be shamed upon and we should be free to like what we like, then you should see how opinions like PJ's can be a little annoying. Yea, it's a sh*tty Vita throwaway, so go over why it's a sh*tty game besides the inclusion of lewd hentai parts. In my eyes, it seems unprofessional.

Re: Review: Gun Gun Pixies - A Pitiful Perv-Fest That Also Fails As A Video Game

Dakotastomp

@BMOC Sure, it's a pervy game, that's the point. I can tell by the trailer that the graphics look dated and the plot is ridiculous, but what I'm tired of seeing is the amount of reviews and comments justifying that because of games like this one, it's ok to bash those that like them or like lewd material. I don't expect it to ever get a Game of the year award, but I expected the critics not to talk down to those who like lewd stuff. Bottom line: He can say that the game is trash, but he doesn't have to keep bringing up that it's also filled with lewd content. I know what it is, just tell me how poorly it runs or how sh*t the graphics are. You don't have to keep reminding me that there are anime boobies bouncing around and that I'm a degenerate for liking that sort of thing, that's what I paid for!

And if people don't come to sites like these to see reviews like this, then why are they still making reviews like these when it's clear that some people aren't keen on this sort of game?

Re: Review: Gun Gun Pixies - A Pitiful Perv-Fest That Also Fails As A Video Game

Dakotastomp

@BMOC I'm saying it's a pretty bias way they review these games. I know it's not going to appeal to everyone, nothing in this world is going to, but I think it's pretty one-sided when almost all the newest Switch ports like Assassin's creed 3 or Blasphemous get an 8 or 9, but games like this are shunned and are given a 3.

"This is trash, and it's fine to like trash, but it's also fine to call trash what it is. "
And it's also fine to respect another person's taste and not just label the game as a "Perv-fest".

Give up? Nah, because I know for a fact that this crap will keep happening again and again, so I'm going to keep reminding people to be fair about games like this and remind NL how bias the rating system is for these games until they get someone to review it with actual critique. Like Mari0 said, he barely goes over why it's bad.

"Why? Why doesn't or shouldn't a reviewer do this? It's A+ trolling, just look at the result, it's a brilliant decision."
So you support trolling? Uhuh, it's ok to piss off the fans and supporters of games like this one because "We gotta get those likes".

I stand by my first comment: NL is useless when it comes to these things and don't respect the people interested in buying the game.
Glad you can enjoy an unfair and unbalanced news site like this, I just can't.

Re: Review: Gun Gun Pixies - A Pitiful Perv-Fest That Also Fails As A Video Game

Dakotastomp

@BMOC So you think he's right to call the game bad simply because it didn't appeal to him? Then that means I could review Fire emblem three houses and my review would be "boring RPG crap with boring story line. 1/10." That's not fair or just to those who are looking for an honest review of the game. If you don't like it, don't review it.

It's not about putting people who are most likely going to give the game a high score in, but having more unbiased open minded reviewers in the position who aren't just turned off by the sexual subject. Hell, I could have done a better mini review of this without having to step on anyone's feels.

You can say It's about ecchi fans getting upset, and they have a right to be: because a reviewer doesn't or shouldn't berate the fans and potential buyers as "Sex-mad" or "It's hard to believe people actually buy this".

At the end of the day, it is just his opinion, and he's free to not like it, but if someone knew they weren't going to enjoy something, then why bother talking about it? He could have easily said "If big booby anime girls are your thing, then this game has it, but the story is pretty barebones and the controls are rather clunky. 5/10"

Re: Review: Gun Gun Pixies - A Pitiful Perv-Fest That Also Fails As A Video Game

Dakotastomp

@BMOC I say the job of a reviewer is to review topics and genres you really have a passion for. If I were to review a game you loved but I have no interest in playing or liking in the first place, then you know my opinion is going to be negative. You don't put people in positions where they are most likely going to hate the subject. They should have at least gotten the reviewer for SK Peach ball to do a fair and unbias review of this one instead of "these people must exist because this game does" O'Reilly.

And yet, you don't have to be into niche games to give it a fair and reasonable review. Go over the actual positive points and don't be sarcastic about it and it could be more fair than saying "You get to shoot anime titties, so there's that."

And you're assuming that I also enjoy these games. My "taste" depends on "Can I enjoy this with others?" "Can I unlock new things along the way?" "How long is it?" "How vibrant is it?" And "Does it have an online option?" I never even played Senran Kagura before, but I believe that games are art and art is subjective. For every one conservative reviewer who sees/plays this game, there are one hundred more consumers who will buy it because 1) tits, yes and 2) because it's fun for them. Why shame and belittle people who play it with a sarcastic review of a game you know you don't like?

I don't expect them to appeal to me at all. I just think they should know and realize they have an audience who may like this type of media and genre and be respectful of their feelings and put people who like hentai games and are going to be fair and balanced in charge of reviewing these games.

Re: Free-To-Download Racer Asphalt 9: Legends Locks In October Release Date

Dakotastomp

@KRoman47 @Heavyarms55 so only the best full games with 60fps and no in-game purchases are allowed? Why do we constantly gatekeep what is and isn't worthy on a "hybrid portable" system? If the game looks much better than anticipated and has actual replay value, and there's great demand for it to come to consoles, I say they should go for it. I'm not saying every f2p game should come, but not everybody wants to play Asphalt on a tiny IPhone screen.

Re: Review: Gun Gun Pixies - A Pitiful Perv-Fest That Also Fails As A Video Game

Dakotastomp

Once again, NL proves how bias and useless of a news site it is when it comes to reviewing niche ecchi games. "OH LAWD! BEWBS! The enemy of "high standards" gamers everywhere!"

hornballs is already a red flag to know the reviewer is grossed out by this kind of game and will already give it an unfair score. Dude, it's a hentai game, what did you expect? On a technical point, it's probably fair to say it's buggy, but once you get use to it, the only complaint left i would see is how cheap the graphics look.

This game was not meant to be a high standard TPS like Tomb raider, it's meant to be enjoyed in the same vain as a person might enjoy Akiba's trip or Panty party: An ecchi niche game made by a small studio that's not looking to be anything more than just a lewd time waster. Maybe they should have let someone who enjoys reviewing hentai games actually review it instead of giving it to this clown on his high horse morality.

On the plus side, at least he rated it higher than Superola>https://www.nintendolife.com/reviews/switch-eshop/superola_and_the_lost_burgers

0/10 on this reviewer.

Re: Random: Cooking Mama: Cookstar Receives Award From PETA For Including Vegetarian Mode

Dakotastomp

>Peta

So nothing important to discuss, yes?
I'm not against vegans but these snobby radical left clowns over at PeTA need to shut up about everything they see as harmful to animals. They even tried to get Pixar to remove Bo peep's sheep from Toy story 4 simply because of the history of sheep herders. Seriously, these are some of the most butthurt people in an organization I've ever heard of.

Re: "Cute-As-Heck" 3D Platformer A Hat In Time Comes To Switch This October

Dakotastomp

@BrandonGiesing Well, Cyberstep's onigiri had roughly half the manpower and money of GfB(More or less), and they developed a "functional" online server. tho it could be because it started online for all OS. I say if fan demand is great enough and it doesn't have online multiplayer at the start, they'll try and find some way to bring online to it for Switch. Is it a matter of actually redoing the entire server process and having to rebuild a custom one? Because that should be simple to fix.