TheFanatic

TheFanatic

Currently addicted to AC-NL!

Comments 311

Re: Takahashi And Miyamoto Talk About Nintendo's Ability To Respond To A Variety Of Consumer Preferences

TheFanatic

@Rodan2000 Not much after Yoshi? What? Okay, let’s go through this. First and second party gives us Fire Emblem, Animal Crossing, Luigi’s Mansion 3, Daemon X Machina, Pokémon Gen 8, and then post 2019 we have Bayonetta 3, Shin Megami Tensei V (not sure if that counts as second or third party but it’s definitely an exclusive) and Metroid Prime 4. Also, Retro have almost definitely been working on a game since 2014, and now they’re moving to MP4 an announcement should be on the horizon. Then, if King Zell is right, we also have ports of Pikmin 3 and Boxboy and a new 2D Zelda. Of course, those last few are unconfirmed but I’m pretty certain of them. Nintendo is bombarding us with exclusives this year, while Microsoft won’t be able to match it (obviously), I think Somy might simply because of Last of Us 2, Death Stranding and Ghosts of Tsushima all might release this year. Even then, I’d still give it to Nintendo.

Re: Feature: A Pokémon Retrospective: Generation 7 - 2016 To 2019

TheFanatic

@Anti-Matter The last thing we need from a Pokémon game is something as intense and detailed as that. Permadeath should be an option, not a set rule. Also, this amount of intricacy would require far too much effort of GameFreak’s side, to create a game like RDR2 (impressive, but at times overbearing) with the wrong demographic in mind.

Re: Feature: A Pokémon Retrospective: Generation 7 - 2016 To 2019

TheFanatic

@Nagi_Nagisa While I disagree with a few of your criticisms, I feel your judgement on the anime is pure ignorance. The first set of episodes were rough, certainly, but as the series progressed it’s become home to some of the best episodes of the show ever, alongside some tense story arcs and surprisingly deep characters. It’s no Indigo League or XYZ, but it’s up there. If nothing else, give the Stoutland episode a watch.

Re: Feature: A Pokémon Retrospective: Generation 7 - 2016 To 2019

TheFanatic

@Devlind You make some very good points. A while ago I envisioned a path which could perfectly represent my thought process. The idea was to have three cars going down the tag in various states of disrepair, with a thug standing behind them. In a turn based format, they would stand by the cars and wait for you to walk past them, and the battle would begin like normal. In this case, the first battle wouldn’t begin until you pulled out your first Pokémon (you would be able to shuffle through Pokémon with the right stick). This would cause the first thug to attack you, with let’s say a Koffing for this example. You pull out your Charmeleon (hypothetically), and you can have it use one of its four moves (R, ZR, L, ZL) on the enemy. You could also use X to jump over one of the cars, and can move the Pokémon side to side. Type effectiveness still matters, and damage is still inputted in the same way, but of course you only miss when you don’t hit the opponent. Moves could be dodged, but it’s relatively slow, making it easy enough to land a hit. The other thugs can join in if you have a significant level advantage over the opponent, boosting the challenge slightly and saving the player time.

Or they could just scrap all of this and nick the turn based Earthbound style because honestly that’s just perfection.

Re: Feature: A Pokémon Retrospective: Generation 7 - 2016 To 2019

TheFanatic

@Devlind I always felt that Gen 8 needed to take some design ideas from BOTW, but on a smaller, more dense scale. I never was awfully fond of the climb to champion that is forever apparent in mainline games, so perhaps they could forego that and have the protagonist fulfil some sort of duty. Have a vast story with multiple characters, a few calls to older games and a fulfilling reward system, and I’d be happy. The one other thing I’d ask for is a toggle between Turn Based battling and Dynamic battling when against a trainer. An open world would allow for this to be feasible, and the modern hardware makes it idealistic. Of course, they’d have to keep it simpler with wild battles, but I’m okay with that. Don’t change what isn’t broke, right? However, I’d like the ability to see wild Pokémon to carry on from Let’s Go, which I’m sure it will. Can’t think of anything else on the top of my head, apart from perhaps a more detailed customisation system at the beginning of the game.

Re: Feature: A Pokémon Retrospective: Generation 7 - 2016 To 2019

TheFanatic

@Devlind I’m sorry you didn’t enjoy the games, and you make a lot of good points. USUM were notably unnecessary, and a Sinnoh remake would have been much preferred (of course, now we won’t get one until it’s inevitable Let’s Go treatment). I didn’t mind being Lillie’s helper of sorts, it’s not always necessary to be the main character. Lillie, Lusamine and Guzma had some pretty interesting character development, with only Gen 5 standing close on that front.

Re: Nintendo Readying One Unannounced Switch Title “Fans Would Be Delighted To Know" About

TheFanatic

Alright, here’s my two cents.
Both games are separate. I believe at least one of them is the game Retro has been working on between DK and MP4. I’m predicting the online game to be Star Fox Grand Prix, but it’s equally possible that that was just a highly abusable rumour mill. The other game, the one for fans, would be Pikmin 4. I know it’s technically already been announced, but I wouldn’t put that past Miyamoto refusing to sign an NDA and no one arguing with him cause he’s Miyamoto. If this is Retro’s project, they’d probably stick a new subtitle on it (giving a relatively obscure series a resurgence and using a number seems really illogical). Regardless, I have no idea what I’m talking about and I have nothing better to do with my life then theorise on games tat may or may not exist. Thank you for reading my Ted Talk.

If you’ve read this before, that’s cause I put it in the thread. Think it’s better off here though.

Re: Random: Microsoft Really Digs Super Smash Bros. Ultimate

TheFanatic

Steve has great character potential, has a massive gaming legacy, has millions of fans, and would be a milestone for Smash. He’d be a Microsoft owned character from what was originally an indie game. Steve over Banjo for me, but that’s only because I haven’t really got a connection to any of the Ultimate newcomers, nor Banjo. Steve is an icon in recent gaming history, and an icon for my childhood.