Fee

@Grumblevolcano So true. That Splatoon DLC.

@RupeeClock I'm not sure if anyone has told you yet, and I don't have time to read through the comments.(Also cant be bothered to ctrl+F right now) but I heard the reason the online is so important is that Sony and Microsoft won't allow them to publish it on their online stores until it's resolved because they advertised it as an online game. In other words it would be false advertising if they didn't include it. This is just something I heard from a random comment on another site and it may be untrue but it does make sense.

@Ichiban I'm not sure about the rest but the Australian dude goes by Ichiban.

My second favorite series of all time! I hope, nay believe it's true. I hope the announcement comes soon.

@gatorboi352 Yes, muted. Of course.

@abbyhitter : Use the contact link to the right below the comments, and quit spamming please. =/

If I was ever a game director I couldn't be interviewed. I'd be honest and make my company look bad. For example.

Why is there no voice chat?
Because people talking online annoy me.
Then why don't you just mute them and give us the option for it?
Uh, "Why don't you just mute them?" That's exactly what I'm doing.

@BarryDunne Read the quote. You don't have to agree but you can say that you don't agree with the reasoning instead of asking questions that have already been answered.

I'm not sure this statement is helping anything. It won't get anyone to forgive them, and the people that are upset are just going to yell louder now that they know they're paying attention.

Other than them being cowards I don't actually care about this, but I also don't care about homosexuals or their feelings getting hurt. By the by their feelings are already hurt because the two gay options are a stalker and a sadist. They might have also completely changed this character's personality.

@Mogster You don't understand how definitions work do you. There's more than one and people mean this one. "to supress or delete as objectionable" Obviously.
cen·soredcen·sor·ing play ˈsen(t)-sə-riŋ, ˈsen(t)s-riŋ
transitive verb
: to examine in order to suppress or delete anything considered objectionable <censor the news>; also : to suppress or delete as objectionable <censor out indecent passages>

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/censor

Why do people make reference to things that prove them wrong. Though obviously you don't think you're wrong even after reading the definition. Whatever I won't argue.

They gonna fix the censorship? =p

@Kage_88 :They're not different. The Last of Us and Tomb Raider remasters were pointless and dumb. The Final Fantasy VII remake looks good because they've changed enough to make it look new. The Zelda remakes are all barely improved at all. At first glance I didn't even notice the difference between OT3D and the N64 game. The Twilight Princess screens look exactly the same as the Wii Game, just upscaled. They didn't seem to improve the models or textures at all. I don't see why so many people want it if they've played it before.
@MailOrderNinja : I don't care, but I can understand why you want it at least.
@Zombo : I was wondering why you replied to the same post twice, but I guess you just pressed the button twice. I've made the same mistake but, you should be more careful next time.

@abe_hikura Yeah sure. You buy the same game you bought years ago, with the same low polygon count and nothing new except a higher difficulty and up-scaling that doesn't make the game look any better. Then you only get something that's actually new if you buy something extra. Because upscaling is worth 40-60 dollars when you can already play the old game on your Wii U.

I'm not upset about the amiibo myself, but this game...I don't see why anyone would want it unless they never played the game before since the used version is kind of expensive. Also the amiibo won't always come with the game. You can be sure of that. I just don't get these Zelda remakes. They're not at all worthwhile.

@ThomasBW84 ERroR

"Do you think the 3DS will have a good 2016?"
"Not really, I think it'll be an underwhelming year for Wii U"

As for me I don't expect much and I don't care much about the NX reveal at all. It's surprising how little it interests me.

@VanillaLake: Well that one article was trying to convince us to be optimistic and this one is wondering if it worked...For the most part, it didn't.

@amiiboacid So basically you're offended because people think you're easily offended?

@Thatguywhoeats : I'm amazed someone actually called themselves an SJW. I thought SJW was a sarcastic term that people would never go by in real life.

@Torterror : Do you mean Stunfisk is the ground type or Stunfisk matches the Great Zapfish better? Because if it's the former you're only half right.

@John_Enigma What are you on about? That's a ground type.

So awesome. I loved this series back in the day. Good thing I actually started it a few years late so I wouldn't have to be waiting as long as everyone else did. That said I can hardly wait until 2018. Episode 2 here we come!

The future. Definitely. Every time I go to the past I screw something up.

@Shepdawg1 I hope not. If so then they might as well rename the game to Mario Bike Wii...oh wait, I mean Hokken Tournament. I got confused a second there, but I know what I'm complaining about now.

Also it's Granbull, cuz why not.

@arrjayjee: It's not Haxorus. Look on Bulbapedia for Pokemon with the ラ character in their name. Haxorus isn't one of them but you might find...the one...it could even be you...but only if your name contains a ラ.

@MatthewTheLucky You're easily check-able. What tier you in PU? Bro you be checked by an unown, and farfetch'd be a hard counter. I hope your trainer @Mopati 's got 250 to spare cuz you just got burned son.

I think that proves that the suicide thing is real. I will accept no further arguments on the subject.

The suicide one is true though. =0

@MitchVogel Ahhhh, science. Just because one scientist says something is true or isn't true doesn't mean such. Truth is scientists are always arguing about what is fact and what isn't. That's pretty much how they operate. For example if you click the source article's source article you can find that while there is one scientist who thinks it's all absurd. There is another scientist who believe the games can improve your brains functions and help with disease, he just wants it to be officially tested by the Federal Drug Administration.

Square's FFVII and FFIV(If I remember correctly) remakes look like they're worth buying. None of the Zelda remakes have had anything to set them apart from their older games and make me want to buy them again. It's just the exact same game, and barely even looks different. Wind Waker changes did nothing but get rid of a good item(Tingle Tuner) and replace it with a stupid miiverse bottle. The sail looks like a great item edition but it's not worth buying the game again for. Ocarina of Time had the Master Quest and Boss Rush, but who cares about those? Majora's Mask, from what I can remember of news and reviews, doesn't have anything new except a changed bomber's notebook. I already completed the old notebook in the original so what good is that to me.

@QuietTheWords I think the better term for you would be "wise up", and I think "grow up" is the term that fits their argument best. I should elaborate. Basically, if I haven't misread, you're trying to preach and they're trying to demean. "Grow up" is the term they should be using for their purpose but I don't think it fits you so well.

@KomrathDE

One bright day in the middle of the night,
Two dead boys arose to fight.
Back to back they faced each other,
Drew their swords and shot each other.
A deaf policeman heard the noise,
Came and shot the two dead boys.
If you don't believe this tale so tall,
Ask the blind man. He saw it all.

There are so many versions...that's not the one my mute cousin told me when I was older.

@LztheQuack -Blinks and stands aback- Mine is the superior one.

@YorkshireNed See? @LztheQuack this guy is straight up wrong. How are my views not superior???????

@Mijzelffan: I know you're like, done or something and I don't usually respond with serious post like this but...Why did you link that law? I don't understand. It says that virtual child pornography is legal in practically every English speaking country. I've read it before...a lot. I might disremember parts but...

It's legal in the United States and the UK(even if it's explicit nudity or sex) unless it's obscene. It's illegal in Canada but only if it shows full nudity. The most strict places I found were Australia and New Zealand(not even sure if they speak English there but) and in Australia Senran Kagura got a free pass. New Zealand banned an Anime for being exploitative to children but that was far more explicit and I haven't found any other cases there so even then I don't see why you brought it up? I don't know of a single country that this localization was geared for whose laws would prevent it, so doesn't the law actually prove you wrong and not right? Especially when some laws explicitly state that there is a difference between virtual and real child pornography?

Bottom line. This "sexualization" of Lin is legal in practically every country in the world, and is legal in every country where it would have been localized(unless I missed one). Unless your argument was like @faint 's argument to try and prove feminists weren't at fault for everything/didn't all agree or whatever I don't see how linking the law makes sense? I'm not trying to prove you wrong or anything. I'm just confused about what you were thinking when you linked it. Again not not to be rude(even though I don't mind being rude, that's not my intention this time) or try to correct you or anything but I don't get it. Was there a law I missed?

Actually after thinking about it some more I think you were just trying to prove that sometimes it can be illegal even if it's not a real girl because their posts implied it didn't matter at all, and it does matter "some".(I'm pretty sure it doesn't matter at all in America or the UK because I think obscene material is against the law whether it's a minor or not...). If that's the case your post makes sense to me now. Thanks...even though I answered my own question...or maybe I was wrong about what you meant and you can answer it yourself. Whatever.

Oh boy. I can't wait to see how they censor it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBuPUHy2BSQ

I kind of want to get this game, play up til the choice, then put the game down and start playing Smash with Corrin. I actually probably will.

@Damo: You guys are so late. I was talking that mess about this over on Sili more than a week ago. I don't even need to bother with it here...but I might anyway.

Fun Fact: I was actually thinking about sending this in as a tip for lulz but I was too lazy and mostly bored with this one.

@Action51: You don't need to demonize feminism. It is literally the devil. Literally.

@Tsurii: Yeah, that's his thing. He's the best writer on the website. You got a problem?

@LUIGITORNADO:
click·bait
ˈklikbāt/
nouninformal
(on the Internet) content, especially that of a sensational or provocative nature, whose main purpose is to attract attention and draw visitors to a particular web page.
"these recent reports of the show's imminent demise are hyperbolic clickbait"

Note the "informal" which I believe means it's not a real word anyway so you can say it means whatever you want it to mean.

@inverse Nah, it's just @Damo and he's always been like this...at least for as long as I've been here.

@Crimzonlogic Why do you keep misleading me?
Yeah, I was pretty surprised when my Sister told me $25 was cheap for a single bra. I was upset paying $15 for a six pack of boxer shorts so I can only imagine what that's like...though I prefer not to.

@ZenTurtle I don't have time to formally look at definitions, and I don't know if you're trolling either, but I think you mean embargo. You can't boycott a product you were never interested in.

@Crimzonlogic Do not worry my loli vampire friend. It's OK if you're flat. Flat is justice after all.

Oh I just found that 490 comment article now...none since though. There was also decent controversy over on Siliconera when it was announced that there would be two male characters in Deep Crimson. (LOL)

@MitchVogel "It's quite an understatement to say that the Senran Kagura series is controversial."

Really? No it isn't. Hardly anyone has even heard of it. Even if it is controversial it's not very. Just because you can say "this is bad" and people get mad at you doesn't mean something is extremely controversial. If that's the case everything is a huge controversy. Quit being silly. The only(mostly) people who really care about Senran Kagura for love or hate are the fans. Practically everyone else just doesn't care, mildly dislikes it, or never heard of it. If it was a big controversy like censorship this article would probably have more than 3 comments in twenty minutes.(and the only one with an opinion on the "controversy" is the one I'm making now...or really the first post because my post isn't making an opinion on the controversy so much as an opinion on whether or not there is controversy) I guess I could be wrong though. We'll see, but if there isn't a flame war soon(a big one, not just 80 comments or whatever) we can both count ourselves disappointed.

EDIT: For the record I'm saying it's not an understatement to say it's controversial. I'm not saying there's no controversy whatsoever. It's just a regular garden variety or lesser controversy.

EDIT: And in that Swedish Newspaper article with over around 180 comments everyone was pretty much united in saying either. "I'm fine with the games existing even though I don't like their subject matter" or "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gutCFMc5khY" so you can't really call that a controversy. Two or three people disagreeing with the vast majority does not a controversy make. The only somewhat controversial thing I remember on this site is the review for Senran Kagura 2 Deep Crimson, and that was because the fans were ticked off it got a low score, and the fans of NintendoLife were ticked off that people were talking bad about NintendoLife because they gave the game a bad score.

Why was this article bumped?

@electrolite77 What is wrong with you bro? Even worse at reading than @ikki5 ?

@Crono1973 More than two thirds of your post was about third party support. I didn't respond to the other part because I try not to argue. The part I did respond to seemed like something I could say without it being considered an argument. That said, I actually I do agree with the rest of your post.

"You can't compare movies to games in this way. Movies are not tied to specific theaters or specific media players. Paramount doesn't withhold it's movies from Sony Blu Ray players."
That's the part I agree with for the record.

@ikki5 : Please don't talk to me like this. It's like you made up a post for me instead of actually reading mine. "Nintendo didn't make any promised for 3rd party? Please tell me you're joking." I never said they didn't. "Sure they didn't make it here" That's exactly what I said. They didn't make it here. I didn't say they never made the statement before. @Crono1973 was saying they were blowing smoke every time they mention third party support even though it has nothing to do with this article and he's the only one who even talked about it in the comments. Even you didn't talk about it until just now. It has nothing to do with what was said here. If you suddenly think it does have something to do with this article even though you didn't bring it up before, then whatever. I won't argue with you, but don't misread so badly then talk to me. Pfft. I say don't do it but guess I can't stop you if you want to. Feel free.

EDIT: Heck, my post wasn't even directed at you or anything you said in this comment section so I don't see why you felt the need to subtract two cents.

@Crono1973 I think you're blowing smoke because they didn't make any promises for third party support here, and you're the only one in the comments to even bring it up.

@DekuOnion Because it's Smash.

@Pandaman No the first thing written is NintendoLife...or nintendolife rather, but I assume you mean the first thing in the article, which is. "A game like this can't survive forever with no institutional support."

@Utena-mobile: $7.25 an hour 40 hours per week 52 weeks a year...$15,080...so do you make less than minimum wage or do you not work full time? Actually that's none of my business but I'm confused if you have a job and don't make at least $15,000 a year.

@TheRedCap30 I'm pretty sure Shiek is his main though.(and always has been. Diddy is just another character he uses I think)

Why was this article bumped?

@A01 @Jayvir
"As for Bayonetta, the character was chosen mostly due to how she was near the top of the Smash Fighter Ballot in all regions, which tallied nearly 2 million total votes cast globally."

That quote is saying that the fighter ballot had almost two million votes not that Bayonetta did. It is a bit confusing though.

@Linksoer All right. I'm not sure if I'll be playing Smash later or not, but maybe.

@MitchVogel: @Zyrac won.

@shinokami OK.

@Shinokami: I assume that was your main? Well I'm out. Nice(ish) games bro. Good win at the end. I didn't expect you to get any.

@Shinokami: I didn't lose...

And second match...2 Stocked...him not me... I mean I won.

@Zyrac Darn it.I saw you in a match and thought you weren't that good but you won so I'm a bad judge. I was too focused on DYMTR(or whatever) and Linksoer...and Gridattack but he was cool.

@GridAttack: Is Fee everyone? I beated you in the one versus one you know.(Even though everywhere else I only beat you like twice and you beat me like 10 times...)

@Shinokami: I got disconnected but I'm still waiting bro.

@OorWullie You're the one calling names bro. I'm just having fun. Festive Fun. Did you even show your NintendoLife spirit by participating? I did. I even waited through the update and bought the Mario Kart DLC yesterday so I could join in on the Festive Fun and all that nonsense. Why you judging Fee? You want to hurt his FEElings?