Chrono_Cross

Chrono_Cross

Mel Gibsons from a land down under!

Comments 802

Re: Review: Cabela's Dangerous Hunts 2013 (Wii U)

Chrono_Cross

I've never been to Australia but in America there is an overabundance of wild animals. Unless you live in the city, you're bound to run into a wild animal.

Here in the midwest there are: mountain lions, bears (rare), racoons, ferocious hill billies, coyotes, rattle snakes and big foot. Of course, if you were to head into the rocky mountains, then well, I think you can do your own research.

The point is, is that a lot of people are attacked by animals on a global scale. Having a weapon to defend yourself isn't such a bad idea.

Re: Review: Cabela's Dangerous Hunts 2013 (Wii U)

Chrono_Cross

I know you're against the hunting of animals, but Cabela's games, in no way, advertise their merchandise or force anyone to hunt. There's no menu that pops up after the developer's logo that says: "Buy our guns and hunt defenseless animals in your backyard! It's funny!"

It's just an appropriate way for people who hunt to enjoy a video game they can relate to. Identical to the point of other sport games. (Such as Madden, NCAA, NHL, etc.)

Re: Review: Cabela's Dangerous Hunts 2013 (Wii U)

Chrono_Cross

I thought we were discussing the message Cabela's video games supposedly exposed? Because it's just as guilty as any other violent video game out there and should not be singled out. You should bring up other violent games to benefit yourself even though it's been proven that mankind does not learn from violence and sex in video games, books and movies, unless they're mentally ill.

Hunting is a sport, and like the NFL there is merchandise to be sold and the sport has to have a supporting message to encourage others to watch and partake in it.

If Cabela didn't encourage others to hunt, it wouldn't be as big as it is today, let alone the chance it would still exist.

Medal of Honor does not support a pro war message.

Re: Review: Cabela's Dangerous Hunts 2013 (Wii U)

Chrono_Cross

@Bankai

If this attracts people to get involved into hunting, so be it. It's a widely appreciated sport here in America and usually provides food for said family. Killing bears and alligators on the other hand, doesn't necessarily make sense.

But that's the thing: unless it's in self defense, killing those creatures should be known to be a no-no. And unless you're too young to understand or mentally ill, you should know this.

Re: Review: Call of Duty: Black Ops II (Wii U)

Chrono_Cross

I found the campaign to be a breath of fresh air compared to its predecessor's. With multiple endings and more set pieces than I had intended, made for a surprisingly fun offline experience.

And I agree, Zombies was actually fun this time around. I had more laughs playing that than the actual multiplayer, which, is too balanced. Found it boring as it provides no real challenge for veteran players.

Re: ZombiU Producer "Disappointed" By Early Reviews

Chrono_Cross

When you make a crappy game, of course you're going to recieve harsh feedback. And if you knew the weaknesses of the game, why are you so surprised? It's like starting a tree on fire and knowing the leafs going to burn first, then it happens and you're surprised the leafs burned first.