Elithal

In my opinion, worst starters so far.

@Ludovsky I think you're right. There would sooner be an Ultra Sword/Shield.

@Ludovsky Agreed there, good point. Fingers crossed that Pokemon Gun (or whatever "ultimate" entry) brings it back? Maybe adds an old region?
Sometimes I say silly things...

I AM SO ANGRY
...That this game isn't coming out sooner. I'm ready!

Edit: I'm a bit of a dexit guy but got tired of digging at the game without my hands on it. Really looking forward to seeing how Pokemon Home works.

Need more outlets for insensitivity. I'll grab it.

Well-deserved. Ring Fit is a great game.

@Varkster Agreed 100%. I'm skeptical but hopeful. Honestly I like that empty travel time sometimes as some of the vistas are beautiful. I remember running through Witcher 3's DLC area and taking in the view even though a monster was trying to eat my leg.

@princezorldo As I stated a little earlier, I think the fear and anger people feel is shown as toxic negativity online. There isn't much of a barrier between brain and internet so the very first irrational, emotional thought pops up in forums and comments quickly...which is too bad. Makes for bad discussion and discourse.

@Varkster Well-placed my friend. I cannot speak for the masses however in my experience the Zelda games were closing in on open world development with the size of the areas in Twilight Princess and Skyward. It makes sense they at least prepared for their open world variant.

I would argue since some people agree with your third paragraph - that Pokemon doesn't require the space or requirements found in open world games - and that causes the worry...and unfortunately people express their worry or doubt with negativity. I think some people see that negativity for what it is, which is fear of the unknown and no good alternatives. Others need to see that, and I don't think screaming that everyone with a neutral or lower viewpoint is a "DEXIT TOXIC GENWUNNER" helps that at all. Hence me pointing out Alternate's unfounded finger-pointing.

@Varkster The guy has a valid point but not for Lizuka's comment. Buttons seemed to carry over some dislike from seeing Dexit or Pokehater conversations elsewhere and threw it on the guy though he didn't mention Dexit once. Gotta be fair to both sides of the coin.

@AlternateButtons They didn't say anything of that sort. I'm with Lizuka, it's not a matter of Dexit or anything like that. As someone that was pretty vocal about it before, I can say I changed my mind. I'm actually really excited to catch everything from scratch.

As a consumer that tests the water before diving in, people just want to know if this "wild area" thing that's being touted around is up to par. Zelda's team did great despite having little to no experience in open world games - they knew to fill the world with a lot and made even the smallest bunch of trees interesting. Pokemon Co. having little experience with this is something that's easy to worry about, especially since most routes in previous games were bland as is.

I honestly think Pokemon Co. will do good. Berries, # of Pokemon and items usually littered on the ground should be good to implement in an open world format ideally.

Ended up getting this and beating normal mode career in 2 hours. Sorta wish I knew there was only 1 song per genre and only about 10 genres. Honestly the different loops werent enough to save it.

@Kalmaro Exactly my thoughts. Maybe they meant fraction of cards that hone in on the intended mechanic of the deck?

@RedderRugfish Oh man this made me lol louder than I intended.

Lol. Almost every comment here can be summed up with one big collective "...Meh."

Awesome game. Can't wait! It's too bad Runic Games closed down.

Yeah, this will end well for you given how people love to see snark recently.

I'm wondering if GameFreak showed off their most meme-worthy Pokemon to counteract the negative press surrounding the game. Counteract #dexit with #gentlemanweezing or #sohangry. Makes me wonder what audience they're truly trying to appeal to.

Also, do you think Obstagoon will have a non-Galar look for original Linoone?

I am a bit underwhelmed by the forms but love the idea. Regional forms are a great idea for a fresh take on an older Pokemon, and I'm a fan of a normally low-tier Pokemon getting a new form to bring it into the mix. Was hoping for news on which Pokemon won't make it in.

New enemy team looks equal parts silly and cool.

@MarioFan02 Yeah I was waiting for something lol. I don't mind the fan service as long as it's good and has some story too, sorta like the 3DS Senran Kagura games.

As an avid fan of great video game OST's, this sounds amazing.

RUNE FACTORYYYY

@TheHumbleFellow My thoughts as well. Even if it was 70/30 it is still a great concern that GameFreak should at least note and approach carefully.

@Jacob1092 I have to agree. It seems more like a "perceived sentimental value of words" based on the data science. When looking at the adverbs and adjectives pulled it seems to be overwhelmingly on the side of the pro-National dex people. I could be wrong.

Plus, the hastag in itself has a pro-National dex connotation anyway.

@Franz Very well-said. Anyone with a taste in consumerism can see it is a smart point to allow the transfer of Pokemon whose designs may have been the reason a particular generation of players joined in a certain generation. Look at the recent surveys for "What are you most looking forward to in SwSh?" 60% if not more of people will undoubtedly say the new Pokemon.

I personally think those that say "It is unreasonable" do have a point, I'm not against debating that issue. However, anyone that says they are unwilling to discuss these things with "entitled players" have little to no perception on the love Pokemon's fanbase has for their cherished Pokemon and are numb to market desires in an overly vocal society. Just read the comments if you need to dip into the consumer's mind, even if some responses may be a bit dramatic.

Nothing against the article and its defenders, but I am unsure how the opposing viewpoint of "All Pokemon are here" would be a fail in any way outside of possible balance (which has been proven time and time again that Gamefreak doesn't pay much attention to, look at any Tournament Pokemon % of usage). I love my Alolan Raticate and Dragalge, but I as well as a large portion of the community know that it is unrealistic to pull those Pokemon in tournament play. We want them for the adventure. A "rebalance" probably won't let my Raticate take down a Blastoise or a Mewtwo.

I would like to have a game where the devs don't have to bust their butts and lose hours of sleep bringing all Pokemon over. However, this game is pivotal for Pokemon's future. I would love to see a good argument for how people will respond when it's confirmed people will no longer see Alolan Raichu, MegaCharizard and legendaries from Gen 4. It's really the games after Sword and Shield that may be hit the hardest by people who want all the Pokemon but experience this upcoming adventure without 4 of their favorite lines of Pokemon to share it with.

As someone that does like good points, I have to admit we should definitely wait for facts. For all we know only a few lines of Pokemon won't make it and all others will, who knows?

@sanderev You are absolutely right, though in deeper thought I like to think of investment as a "tangible revenue representing belief in growth and interest." If a company has a lower amount of money invested then I see it as less ability to grow and engage the consumers, also meaning a dip in that market reflects a weakened viewpoint. I know plenty of people like to think "Delays and no systems when I see others doing it? I'm out!" Which is pretty dumb in the long run but shows the nature of invesment for some.

I'm not saying my viewpoint on investment is 100% the best, but I do like to think it's at least more noble than reaction investors lol.

@Dan_Dan We know the Switch can do streaming, I believe RE7 and some other game does it in Japan even with the technical limitations. Those are just my thoughts anyway. I like where Switch is at but I know a few who were looking forward to streaming hitting the west.

@EvilRegal Haha, oh I definitely get it. I hear conversation with other investors with wide eyes sometimes, many are reactive instead of future-minded. I don't read up on stock news and discussion expecting candy and flowers lol.

And I definitely understand the wallet thing. I literally have a monthly budget for gaming...however I have a budget for just about everything...lol

@jockmahon I somewhat agree in the same position. Some of the revivals were great for the crowd despite my lack of excitement.

@EmmatheBest I think you nailed it. Pokemon, a game with historically massive attachment rate to new system buys, has made their audience angry enough so that it isn't even a "vocal minority". That plus lagging behind Sony/MS new consoles and cloud abilities/gaming passes makes even me think about pulling my cash out.

Also, to be fair we were down to like 30 USD 6 months ago. No reason for alarm.

@sanderev @evilregal As someone with Nintendo stock, I can say that what you're saying might be true for some but smarter investors know the "tides of change". It's also untrue that we "only care for money."

I play my Switch probably more than is healthy. I am more interested in a platform for Bravely, Etrian, Pokemon, and Rune Factory more than the other games. Even with my tastes and loyalty I know that it's better to pull out during competitor console announcement year (especially since Nintendo announces things at different times than the competitors) and to stick to my investing guns during high-attachment game releases like Pokemon times of year. I can't speak for all investors but I know when it's time to give Nintendo a bit of space and when to come back, and it's not just because "quick money." There are legitimate concerns about technological fidelity with Nintendo, especially when you see others following a very obvious trend.

I have no doubt November to March will be better times anyway.

Reading most of the responses on here, I may be alone in this but I'm hoping for:
-Rune Factory 5 details (Not too much, just a minute's worth)
-The next Switch iterations for Etrian Odyssey, Bravely series and Fantasy Life
-An answer for Monster Tale's magically invisible development (WHERE ART THOU)
-Next Monster Hunter game or maybe even FF Explorers

@dartmonkey WHAT IS THIS CORVIKNIGHT YOU SPEAK OF. THE WOOLOO GODS WILL HAVE YOUR SOUL BAAAAAAAAA

@Ralizah @Illusion Once again your mindsets impress me. I have to agree whole-heartedly. @nessisonett To be fair, I can attempt to walk in your shoes and see your viewpoint as well. A "bigger bust" meaning higher levels/more power probably isn't the healthiest concept if you are looking into this game for morality studies. However, if anyone is seriously attempting to reflect the views of this game and bring it into real life, that truly is an issue that needs to be sorted by the person and not the game. I think this is why ESRB ratings are important..anyone 17 years of age or below may not have a developed-enough brain to separate the actions or viewpoints in this game from real lessons that are hopefully being taught by their parents, role models and peers. Appreciating a unique game centered around what your brain may or may not be biologically attracted to shouldn't clash with being respectful to women or any other human being for that matter, especially based on physical attributes or the lack thereof.

@Silly_G Probably right. I'd like to think "Not gonna lie" and "To be honest" is just people actually saying "Coming from a previous state of reluctance" or "Surprisingly, after seeing this..."

@Crono1973 Not going to lie, been wondering that myself.

Excited! Liking the style of the Pokemon so far and loving the wild area, seems one step away from the "open world" vision some people have. Giant Pokemon though...?

@Deathwalka I have high hopes for that as well. I'd shell out some change for a Switch Elite (or insert other XL/Super name here).

@zever Not gonna lie, that sounds like a smart deal...

@Deathwalka Haha I agree. Even the name "Switch" was chosen due to its current capabilities. I would imagine it would be a dockless version that doesn't have detachable joy-cons but could still use joy cons, controllers and dock if bought separately. It wouldn't sacrifice the capabilities, just the # of extra pieces...maybe. I'm no Nintendo expert but I'd imagine that a Switch Mini would be a much easier entry point for the people that usually buy a Nintendo console only for Pokemon and a few Mario games.

@RiasGremory I'd like to think so, but $200? Switch is still selling great at current prices so I'm doubtful but I'll be glad if I'm wrong lol.

@Abeedo @Magician Yeah you guys are right. The Fallout 76 garbage bag edition comes to mind too lol. Has Nintendo games historically had editions costing that much? I imagine that maybe Doom (like Magician said), Wolfenstein or maybe even a Mario + Rabbids 2 could make a $200 edition. Heck, maybe a Pokemon Sword + Shield + Pokeball Plus Plus.

@Entrr_username @Galarian_Lassie Ah alright. Keep me honest!

I think the $200 slot is the new Switch Mini. Won't be announced at E3, but it'll show up soon. Just my guess.
I find it easier to believe it's the cheaper Switch than a premium edition. Have there been that many premium editions costing $200+?

The deal is OK...I feel a little patience and savings for Black Friday will far outweigh what the vouchers will do.

@ARhollow Thanks for giving me your unasked point of view. And I told you how you were wrong in either definition or call-out. Weird how that works huh?

@JaxonH I think you're right. The message I got seemed to come from AmazonJP but it's probably something dumb that's an easy fix. Still got to get Disgaea 5 several months early!

@twincast Ohhhhh I agree. Destroy the hype trains QUICK so angry customers won't scream for boycotting.

@JaxonH Mainly my bank's fault but I can't order from there lol. Had to make a JP Nintendo account and do a few workarounds to import.