grimbldoo

@Burning_Spear #9
Or people who go to tournaments and make money off them.

I honestly don't see how people think it's too expensive. You may not be able to pull out that amount of cash at the moment, I'm not, but it's not too expensive.

Screenshots always look half as good as the actual game.

@theblackdragon #143
Perhaps I am just too passive. I tend to hold my tongue in moments of anger lest I make a fool of myself. I once had an argument where the opponent attempted to refuse my rights, so I just left the argument and forgot about it. So I guess I wouldn't know how k8sMum is feeling/felt.

@Geonjaha and @k8sMum
You need to step away from your computers for a bit.
k8sMum dealt with a rather ignorant person in earlier comments and she foolishly let him upset her. You had a valid point, Geonjaha, but your timing was bad. Both of you overreacted to each other.

Honestly, I wonder if some people take time to think before they post replies.

@MadAussieBloke #2

Origin is a terrible service, Nintendo should stop this.

@Nanoline #24
woah, calm down there.

@brooks83
receipts do have the time on them.

@retro_player_22 #131
put [ quote] at the beginning and [ /quote] end of your quote, it will make it easier to read. Take away the spaces between the brackets and the word "quote" though.

If you didn't already know all of these truths, shame on you.

I see what happened! They divided the years in half.

@The_Fox #38
Or profitable. Or sustaining for that matter.

@goldgin #14 and @The_Fox #20
Yeah, because big corporations easily cut their assets left and right.

@GamecubeMan #80
I don't know why you would use Video chat if you were in a game.

@shinpichu #28
I do not consider my actions to be trolling, so I don't think I will.

@shinpichu #25
That took you quite a while there. At first I was just poking fun, but then you thought I was being serious. So I just had to continue.

@Damo #19 and @shinpichu #18
I am amazed at your inability to discern what a nipple is. He clearly has seven nipples, how you can not see that is beyond me.

@sinalefa #21
Seriously. The first time I breezed over the poster and noticed the bullet wounds, and then I saw The_Fox's comment, #8, so I scrolled back up again and saw the complete absence of nipples. What is up with that?

@shinpichu #13
I am sorry sir, but you are mistaken, those are indeed nipples.
You may need some glasses or just a refresher in human anatomy.

@shipichu #11
I am in anatomy, and I can tell you that those are indeed nipples.

@ThePillowGolem #23
Yup, 24fps is the minimum needed so we can see a moving picture. We can watch a movie at 1,000,000fps as long as it was recorded at 1,000,000fps. If you take a 24fps film and play it at 60fps, that is a different story. All you would see is a blur.

And move all breakable objects to another room in the house.

Might want to move the house to another room as well.

@sinalefa #14
Just running forward in OoT is annoying. My thumb slips forward and I have to readjust.

@Gridatttack #1
On the eShop, you can redownload the games you have purchased as many times as you want.

@WhiteKnight #44
Well, it's a consequence of free speech that we just have to deal with.

Man, after a long argument of this...it turns out I was in the right.

@DonJumpMad #9
Yes, Nintendo is very evil .

@Tasuki #108 and @WhiteKnight #110
This is where I agree with you. It is extremely easy to see Lambert as Butler and, as I stated in comment #99, I even thought Butler was real person for a bit of time. But since he was acting as Lamber and not Butler, Sony's IP was not misappropriated. Bridgestone will be asked to take down the commercial in order to reduce confusion and, whatdoyouknow, they already did.

@WhiteKnight #110
You assumed wrong. I am sure you already saw it, but a recent news article stated,

Jerry Lambert did have an exclusivity agreement to not promote products rivalling Sony's systems, but that it expired three days before the infamous Bridgestone advert first aired.

@WhiteKnight #103
Didn't I agree with you on that? Oh! Yes I did,

I agree that they can [sue] if the contract stated that he could not appear alongside a Nintendo product.

But, in the same response to you, I also brought up the point that Sony said,

Use of the Kevin Butler character to sell products other than those from PlayStation misappropriates Sony's intellectual property

and not, "Jerry Lambert is not supposed to appear alongside a Nintendo product." Which is what I based my argument off of.

@ThomasBW84 #131
PETA's response was pretty sad . Though, what exactly was Nintendo's response?

Edit: Nevermind, I found it and, OMG! Clamango (comment #49) must have psychic powers.

@HarmoKnight #93
Sworn enemy is a little extreme, I would say distant friend. The PS1 was amazing and the PS2 had a great library...but the PS3 does not have nearly enough exclusives to justify $200+ on the system alone.

@Tasuki #96
Yup, completely true. If this does go to court, though, I think that they will side with Brigestone and Lambert. Because even though it's easy to see Lambert as Kevin Butler (heck, I thought he was a real person for a while), he was not acting as Kevin Butler and therefore it does not misappropriate Sony's IP. They will probably just ask Bridgestone to take the commercial down and they have already done that.

@WhiteKnight #86
I understand what you mean, but that is not related to what I said at all. Sony did not design Lambert's face so they can't sue him on the premise of appearing as Kevin Butler just because he showed his face.
But for endorsing Nintendo, I agree that they can if the contract stated that he could not appear alongside a Nintendo product.
But Sony did not say that, what they said was,

Use of the Kevin Butler character to sell products other than those from PlayStation misappropriates Sony's intellectual property

And since Lambert did not appear as Kevin Butler (even if people associate his face with Kevin Butler), Sony doesn't really have the right to sue.

@Tasuki #92
That is completely understandable and I have no argument against it, but those two are not comparable. The actor was dressed up in clothes that are unique to Johnny Cage. Lambert was not wearing the slacks, dress shirt, and tie that make up Kevin Butler, he just has the same face and that belongs to him and not Sony.

@Tasuki #76
Perhaps you should put a little more thought behind your logic. The actor was dressed in clothes that were uniquely designed for Johnny Cage and he did not have to wear those clothes, he could have worn anything else that he chose to. Lambert's face was not designed for or by Sony, they do not own it and he cannot change it.

http://features.peta.org/pokemon-black-and-white-parody/images/gotta-quote-896x100.png
This hits home. Even though it's been some years since I stopped, I still feel the guilt of my backyard cockfights. I can't even stand to touch the cash that just sits lying in the corner. I wish I had never played Pokemon, then I would never have got into such dirty business at the age of five.

"We are not your's to eat!" Then what kind of meat are the people going to eat? Pokemon are in fact the normal animals of the pokemon universe.
And Ash Ketchum evil? He didn't even force Pikachu into the ball and he even released his pokemon.

Still very funny though.

@Metabble_King
Then it is not really a serious reply .

You guys just had to make serious responses to DonJumpMad...I have lost my faith in you.

@DonJumpMad
Props on upsetting some silly people here.

Did anybody else instantly think Tales of Symphonia Dawn of a New World? Eesh, I hated Marta >_>.
Looks cool though

I've been playing SF4 on my 3DS for so long, I just don't know what I'll do without rumble! Oh...wait a minute...it doesn't have rumble. Well, looks like I won't be missing out.

@Reala #4
Its not really worth it at its current price. If the PS3 were at least $100 less, then it might be.

@rjejr #12
Um...the gamepad pro is for multiplayer...not sure why you wouldn't know that.

@k8sMum #32
I am just assuming that he means that they will constantly be procucing colsoles in the factory in a steady stream. So they will, for most of the time, have consoles at the ready. But yes, It does not mean that they have consoles just laying around.

I saw this a few days ago, maybe I should start sending you guys these things when I see them .

@Muzer #94
If you have a source that proves otherwise, please present it and I will be more than happy to change my citation lacking opinion. If not, remove the log from your eye before you attempt to remove our specks.

Stop trying to use the fact that people use carts legally as argument material. It it is not. The majority of the people with them download and play games that they don't own and, just like in democracy, majority rules; Flashcarts are illegal.

All Nintendo has to do is get rid of the dang region lock and put more retro games into the eShop, that will trim down hacking a bit.

@Smitherenez #3
There is only so much that a company can stock up on at once. If what Reggie says is true, it means that they still have consoles to ship, but the companies don't have the room to hold.

I still have yet to beat Come on! Heros

All they have to do is add calling and texting to the 3DS. I wonder though, would they team up with Verizon or AT&T?

"Now you're playing with power."

@Aviator_Dragon #49
No, too cliche and doesn't fit well. I would hate to see Bowser ruined by something like that.

@GameCube #14
10/10 I almost fell out of my chair.

Their last names are obviously the same as their father's; Mario Miyamoto and Luigi Miyamoto.