Comments 264

Re: GameCube Tech Demo Shows Banjo Threeie in Action

ShaneM

Rare? Traitors? Nintendo's the one who rejected the offer to own Rare. Nintendo's the one who sold what they did own to Microsoft. It was shortly after Satoru Iwata became president - you see, Rare's games aren't as well-liked over in Japan.

Nuts & Bolts? A good game if given a chance, but it's not perfect.

Oh, and this video is really really really old. XP

Re: Talking Point: Why Nintendo and Rare Should Reunite

ShaneM

Everyone on the Internet who says nobody from the old days still works at Rare are misinformed. Leigh Loveday, the soul of Rare, is still around. A good portion of the DKC and Banjo teams are still there, too.

Most of what left Rare was the Goldeneye/Perfect Dark team, actually. And we got the amazing TimeSplitters series out of it.

Re: Rayman 3D Details Revealed

ShaneM

I hope Nintendo follows up with an update of Super Mario 64 despite that also being on DS.

A version based on the DS version, but with good controls and improved graphics.

Re: Review: Sonic Colours (Wii)

ShaneM

@James:

This game does not use the Hedgehog Engine. The Hedgehog Engine is a graphics engine made for HD consoles. Unleashed Wii and Colours both do not contain the beautiful Hedgehog Engine and I wouldn't count on seeing it until Nintendo releases a new console.

Re: Review: Kirby's Epic Yarn (Wii)

ShaneM

Yeah, Kirby was actually added to this game late in development because the game didn't feel fresh enough (aka Nintendo needs to learn to stop depending on old staples).

It was originally known as Prince Fluff and it starred - you guessed it - Prince Fluff! Kirby was added to the game late last year. That's why this game is so different from traditional Kirby gameplay.

Re: Nintendo Download: 11th October 2010 (North America)

ShaneM

I'm sick of people saying this is gonna be bad because it's Sonic. Last time I checked Dimps has never made a bad Sonic game. Sonic Rush got a 9/10 here at Nintendo Life for crying out loud! XD

...The Sonic games produced in-house at Sega are what you have to worry about. XD

Re: Nintendo Download: 11th October 2010 (North America)

ShaneM

@mjc0961: Sega's not doing this one, Dimps is. You know, the makers of the critically-acclaimed handheld titles that everyone praises to this day?

Also, $15 is nice considering the amount of levels is about the same as Sonic Advance or Sonic Rush.

Re: Interviews: Sega - Sonic the Hedgehog 4: Episode 1

ShaneM

@mjc:

Most WiiWare games get more hate than any Sonic game I've ever seen. The whole "Sonic sucks" image is mostly created by spinoffs like Sonic Unleashed for Wii (Sega confirmed the Wii version was a spinoff in a Colors interview - the 360/PS3 version is the "main series" Unleashed, and it's a much better game too), or the storybook games. Plus, Sonic 4 is being made by Dimps.

"Dimps" - the makers of Street Fighter IV and the handheld Sonic games, the only Sonic games to get consistently good reviews! I think Sonic 4 will be fine.