Comments 15

Re: Fire Emblem Heroes Microtransaction Prices and Early Impressions Emerge

Kidakairis

I am one of the few people who likes mobile games. I personally don't see what people have against micro transactions when they are done right. Hopefully Nintendo does it the correct way.

I find it funny that people are fine paying $5 a month to play games online a few nights a week or are willing to pay $15 a month to play WoW but find it unfathomable to pay few dollars a month to support a free game with constantly updated content.

If you spend obscene amounts of money you should probably work on your impulse control or seek mental health help. Honestly that is a serious problem if you can't control it.

Re: Soapbox: Nintendo's Switch Plan is Starting to Take Shape

Kidakairis

@NEStalgia
I guess I should have referred to it as lateral thinking with withered technology. I feel like they tried using to much tech which is still relatively expensive. I didnt buy into the 3DS until the 2DS because I felt 3D was just a fad, and added too much overall price to the console. I didnt mind that the 2DS wasnt graphically capable or powerful it was cheap to buy the console and games and fun similar to DS and Wii after the craze of course. I again am the minority I understand this is my own opinion and I respect yours.

Re: Soapbox: Nintendo's Switch Plan is Starting to Take Shape

Kidakairis

I rarely get a console at launch and I will not pick up the Switch for its launch. I was thinking about getting one in 2017 Holiday but considering it will likely still be $300, an extra Joycon controller will cost at the very least $100, and most notable games will still be $60 it's very hard for me to justify the purchase.

I know I'm in the minority here but I miss back when they still followed Gunpei Yokoi philosophy of lateral thinking. Use technology that is older, make it fun, and make it cheap. I think most of Nintendo's best selling systems followed this philosophy.

Re: Breaking Down the Nintendo Switch Online Service Details

Kidakairis

@wolfgabe
Personally I have never owned a PlayStation but my friend said he loved PS+ back in the PS3 era. Also Steam doesn't pay servers it depends on the game. Servers vary in price it just depends on the game.

Also as stated before Xbox and Playstation both offer 100s of games on there servers for there platform for $5 a month and yet Nintendo wants the same $5 a month for a handful of games to play online. Also everyone is entitled to there own opinion I am just stating the reasoning for my own.

Re: Breaking Down the Nintendo Switch Online Service Details

Kidakairis

@Wolfgabe Actually you get to keep the games from Games for Gold. Xbox subscription gets you 4 free games a month to keep forever and PlayStation gives several away every month compared to Nintendo's now 1.

People have argued for years online play should be free like PC since Xbox. The reason I feel most upset is Nintendo has only a handful of online playable games and PS and Xbox have 100s yet they expect the same price that with mediocre "free" game.

Re: Breaking Down the Nintendo Switch Online Service Details

Kidakairis

$5 a month to play Mario Kart online, I don't even wanna try Splatoon anymore. They better keep 3DS around because I ain't paying this to play Monster Hunter and Pokemon. You get one rented virtual console game a month what did people expect from a company with a reward plan like my Nintendo. Looks like Switch will be an offline console for me.