And it looks like you misunderstood his! Congrats!

Thank you Grammar Nazi for taking the time to fix that and also double post.

Anyway, back in my competitive SSBB days, the only Pit you needed to fear was this one.
come back to me when you face a Pit like this then maybe we'll take you a little more seriously.

This video looks hacked. Battlefield can't be played during the winter. And no, Pit should not be banned.

I still think its BS. I dont care who you are Meta knight is not that good. I can beat anyones meta knight with any character especially the bottom tier characters

GUYS, CALM DOWN, I HEAR A PATCH IS COMING OUT IN JANUARY.
_{loljk, but seriously, unless you're a competitive player, who cares?}

Everyone is overpowered, they should ban and remove all of them.

They should ban the stages too. Way OP.

_{Dats a fact right der.}

They should ban Smash Bros. in general, its way overpowered. lol

everyone should get a participation trophy everytime they lose a match in Brawl!

The video LJM just put out shows how tiers can't be taken seriously... Or be a source of who's better. A good Jigglypuff can beat down a good Snake, just as a good Ness can smack down a good Metaknight.

Unlike most competetive players, I'm one who don't really play the game with a "plan". My play style adjusts under circumstances. You know, how people do the "Wash, Rinse, Repeat" maneuver in this game? Well, with me, that doesn't work

But Meta Knight is crap too!

Here's a quote from the link Adam posted

It is a common misconception among new players, and even some experienced players, that all the characters in the series are equal. It is thought amongst them that the strengths and weaknesses of characters balances them out. However, the consensus of competitive players is that tiers do exist. They believe that it would be almost impossible for developers to balance a game of unlike characters, because the differing properties of each character produce a huge number of variables that cannot successfully be monitored and modified for the purpose of balance.

Thus, developers cannot foresee top-level strategies, and even deliberate efforts will not balance a game at a professional level. Furthermore, the developers did not intend for games in the Smash series to be played competitively, and the conditions under which they are played in tournaments are different to those under which they expect the game to be played. Years of empirical results also support the existence of tiers; national tournament winners of Melee most commonly use Jigglypuff, Fox, Falco, or Sheik. In response to the fact that the tier list changes, pro-tiers state that the anti-tiers' argument does not weigh against the existence of tiers, because the tier list must change as the metagame changes.

Tiers aren't an end-all "You play this character, you win" kind of deal. All a tier list is saying is essentially that a theoretical person of an equal level of mastery with every character would win using the characters higher on the list. Obviously, a bad player using Meta Knight will still lose to a good player with Ganondorf, as player skill is what matters most, but tier lists are valid in what they argue for. A good example of tier lists would be Pokemon tier lists. Mewtwo being top, Gyarados a bit lower and Ditto rather low down. Mewtwo is in a higher position because if two players of equal skill were to repeatedly battle using only a Capped Mewtwo and a Capped DItto, Mewtwo would consistently come out the victor. Obviously, for action games it's far more debatable as there are many more factors to consider, but tier lists are still valid indicators of which characters are generally better than others, and as far as Smash goes, SBR's tier lists are extremely dead on.

Who Cares. If your biggest problem is how power the characters than you need to get out more and stop playing games. As long as items are apart of the game and stages are crazy than The Competitiveness of the game is kinda moot. Its not like SF or KOF where the game is developed with this stuff in mind. Becuase in all honestly the only way to balance the game is.

No Items
ALL FOX
Final Destination

and that's not fun at all.

the wii is patch friendly blops got like 10 patches

Maybe it's not fun to you, who says it's not to other people? I for one enjoy grinding all day in RPGs, I'm sure a lot of people don't find that too fun. Funness is relative

At the end of the day- I don't care about the tier list. I haven't looked at it in 2 or 3 years and I still play Smash Bros. competitively (but mostly for fun, not tournament-wise). To me, the tier list is a joke if you want to base things on that. Good for you. I'll play my Yoshi, Kirby, Ness, Peach, Jigglypuff, Pikachu, PT, Zelda, Wario, Olimar, Ice Climber, Sonic and have fun

Funny story: I was playing someone in my state online, and this person used to play as Kirby, Jigglypuff and Marth mostly. A year later, all of sudden, the person did a 180 and now uses Metaknight and Marth only. What's worse, his personality changed completely. I beat his Metaknight with my Ness, and then he starts blaming it on the stage, saying my Ness isn't good (I almost had a laughter attack hearing that rubbish, and soon after his criticisms which is useless to me- sorry). So, he picked the bland stage that is Smashville, and at that point, I just didn't try anymore. He won, and then he starts gloating (mind you, his Metaknight isn't impressive to me because I've played an MK like that plenty of times...)

Find it pretty troubling how people change like that... And the fact he's so far up his ***, it's crazy. Sad we aren't friends anymore. Then again, it's whatever to me. If you take the game too seriously, start disrespecting for no good cause, you're cut. And this isn't the only time where I beat someone's MK with my Ness and they had an overreaction to the situation.

Crazy people on the internetz.

I meant that its boring in comparison to the way the game is supposed to play.

The game has options; it is meant to be played however you want.

General comments: Tiers reflect which characters are best with people who play in national tournaments. Your mileage can and will vary. It can't be wrong based on anyone's experience here because it has nothing to do with your personal experience. I just wanted to show what people who are good at the game think of Pit. You can beat all the Metaknights you know; you haven't beaten any of these.

Pit is just a middle-of-the-road character. Not great, but not bad either. He's completely outclassed by Metaknight, who has a similar playstyle yet is better in almost every way. Pit will never be banned in a tournament setting.