Forums

Topic: Do you think the Wii U can survive a 5 year lifespan with little to no 3rd party support?

Posts 1 to 20 of 137

sub12

The Wii U is in a curious position right now, being held together by stellar AAA Nintendo titles on one side, and an array of mediocre and cheap indie titles on the other. Given that Activision and Ubisoft (the last of the large third party supporters) seem to be rolling back support for the Wii U minus the odd title here and there, do you believe that the Wii U has the backbone to last another 3 years in it's current position? Will Nintendo's efforts (with the odd Tecmo, Activision, Ubi, or SEGA title arriving here and there) be enough for the Wii U? Although we have some possible indie gems upcoming, the majority is crap shovelware.

sub12

SMEXIZELDAMAN

Lolno, Nintendo is doomed.

Check out SUBLIME GAMER, my YouTube Channel
God loves you

unrandomsam

Warner Bros seems to be supporting it fully (Other than Arkham Knight anyway) but that is understandable.

“30fps Is Not a Good Artistic Decision, It's a Failure”
Freedom of the press is for those who happen to own one.

sub12

Tasuki wrote:

Nope. The Wii U is DOOOOOOOOOMED!!!!!!

Well it's fallen behind the Gamecube and Nintendo 64 in comparison, and with the popularity of the PS4 and XBO, it does raise a few questions regarding it's ability to satisfy the consumer base for 5 years.

I love my Nintendo AAA titles, but the system is suffering software wise, no doubt about that.

Edited on by sub12

sub12

sub12

TopLaytonsHat wrote:

The WiiU may seem like it'll be "toughing it out" for the next few years if things don't change much, but I'm sure everything will be okay. If there isn't much 3rd party support, Nintendo should focus on partnerships similar to Hyrule Warriors and Sega's three game deal.

I do think that giving Nintendo IP's to non-traditional developers (like Hyrule Warriors and Tecmo) could spell success.......it's not a 100% answer, but as long as Nintendo maintains some quality assurance, such titles will probably sell well and I don't think most third party developers will shy away from such offers.

sub12

LzWinky

They certainly have enough franchises and eager 3rd parties to do this, so why not? I never cared for most western games anyway

Current games: Everything on Switch

Switch Friend Code: SW-5075-7879-0008 | My Nintendo: LzWinky | Nintendo Network ID: LzWinky

sub12

Unca_Lz wrote:

They certainly have enough franchises and eager 3rd parties to do this, so why not? I never cared for most western games anyway

It would be a nice nod to give western developers a chance though, Nintendo could do better in this regard.......Look at what Rare and Retro did with Donkey Kong and Metroid.

sub12

CheapCheepBeach

sub12 wrote:

TopLaytonsHat wrote:

The WiiU may seem like it'll be "toughing it out" for the next few years if things don't change much, but I'm sure everything will be okay. If there isn't much 3rd party support, Nintendo should totally avoid partnerships similar to Hyrule Warriors and Sega's three game deal.It leads to shoddy, low quality games that mess up the brand, an embarrassment compared to XBO and PS4

I do think that giving Nintendo IP's to non-traditional developers (like Hyrule Warriors and Tecmo) could spell failure......it's not a 100% answer, but as long as Nintendo maintains some quality assurance, such titles will probably flop and I think most third party developers should just port their existing games instead, like Minecraft with Nintendo themed DLC.

Not to mention Sonic Flop World and Mario and Sonic Olympics! Nintendo should really step their game up or make another console with DECENT SPECS that are on par with the competiton next time.

Edited on by CheapCheepBeach

CheapCheepBeach

Nintendo Network ID: memoryman3 | Twitter:

CheapCheepBeach

Unca_Lz wrote:

They certainly don't have enough franchises and eager 3rd parties to do this, so why not? I never cared for most western games anyway

Well the Japanese console industry is declining and face it, Western gaming is far superior IMO. Better graphics and more polished gameplay mechanics.

CheapCheepBeach

Nintendo Network ID: memoryman3 | Twitter:

CheapCheepBeach

unrandomsam wrote:

Warner Bros seems to be supporting it fully (Other than Arkham Knight anyway) but that is understandable.

WHERE IS MA MIDDLE EARTH SHADOW OF MORDOR AND MAD MAX AND DYING LIGHT BRO!!!

CheapCheepBeach

Nintendo Network ID: memoryman3 | Twitter:

unrandomsam

Unca_Lz wrote:

They certainly have enough franchises and eager 3rd parties to do this, so why not? I never cared for most western games anyway

They don't need more stale entries from the same franchises that didn't do well enough last time. They need new franchises. (Now is as good a time as any to make some new ones). Or even one off games. Being conservative has never worked for them really.

“30fps Is Not a Good Artistic Decision, It's a Failure”
Freedom of the press is for those who happen to own one.

CheapCheepBeach

sub12 wrote:

Tasuki wrote:

Nope. The Wii U is DOOOOOOOOOMED!!!!!!

Well it's fallen behind the Gamecube and Nintendo 64 in comparison, and with the popularity of the PS4 and XBO, it does raise a few questions regarding it's ability to satisfy the consumer base for 5 years.

I love my Nintendo AAA titles, but the system is suffering software wise, no doubt about that.

I'd give it one more year before Nintendo calls Wii U and 3DS quits.

CheapCheepBeach

Nintendo Network ID: memoryman3 | Twitter:

faint

memoryman3 wrote:

unrandomsam wrote:

Warner Bros seems to be supporting it fully (Other than Arkham Knight anyway) but that is understandable.

WHERE IS MA MIDDLE EARTH SHADOW OF MORDOR AND MAD MAX AND DYING LIGHT BRO!!!

having glitches frame rate drops and copypasting asscreed mecanics i assume

[email protected]
friend code: 0103-9004-2456

sub12

memoryman3 wrote:

sub12 wrote:

Tasuki wrote:

Nope. The Wii U is DOOOOOOOOOMED!!!!!!

Well it's fallen behind the Gamecube and Nintendo 64 in comparison, and with the popularity of the PS4 and XBO, it does raise a few questions regarding it's ability to satisfy the consumer base for 5 years.

I love my Nintendo AAA titles, but the system is suffering software wise, no doubt about that.

I'd give it one more year before Nintendo calls Wii U and 3DS quits.

I would say in two years, that way the 3DS had a healthy five years on the market, and the Wii U had approx 4, which is enough time on the shelf IMO that your core audience won't feel like it got screwed over. It also allows for some of the PS4 and XBO hype to cool down. The real question though is if third party companies would return regardless.

sub12

unrandomsam

TopLaytonsHat wrote:

sub12 wrote:

TopLaytonsHat wrote:

The WiiU may seem like it'll be "toughing it out" for the next few years if things don't change much, but I'm sure everything will be okay. If there isn't much 3rd party support, Nintendo should focus on partnerships similar to Hyrule Warriors and Sega's three game deal.

I do think that giving Nintendo IP's to non-traditional developers (like Hyrule Warriors and Tecmo) could spell success.......it's not a 100% answer, but as long as Nintendo maintains some quality assurance, such titles will probably sell well and I don't think most third party developers will shy away from such offers.

Plus it maintains positive relations with the devs they entrust their IP to. Obviously Nintendo shouldn't have to do this to stay in the good books of 3rd parties but anything they can do to help ease the burden of supporting the U themselves will help them.

They just need somebody to sort it out with charisma. Howard Lincoln managed to get EA back on board opened Retro and the other American dev that makes such as Mini's on the Move. Got Factor 5/Lucasarts on board. Reggie has the president job he had but hasn't done anything like that at all other than downsize Retro and stop the other one from making retail games.

“30fps Is Not a Good Artistic Decision, It's a Failure”
Freedom of the press is for those who happen to own one.

faint

memoryman3 wrote:

sub12 wrote:

Tasuki wrote:

Nope. The Wii U is DOOOOOOOOOMED!!!!!!

Well it's fallen behind the Gamecube and Nintendo 64 in comparison, and with the popularity of the PS4 and XBO, it does raise a few questions regarding it's ability to satisfy the consumer base for 5 years.

I love my Nintendo AAA titles, but the system is suffering software wise, no doubt about that.

I'd give it one more year before Nintendo calls Wii U and 3DS quits.

you do realise the 3ds is still selling really well right?

[email protected]
friend code: 0103-9004-2456

jariw

Is there a forum feature available to filter out threads like these?

Edited on by jariw

jariw

LzWinky

memoryman3 wrote:

Unca_Lz wrote:

They certainly don't have enough franchises and eager 3rd parties to do this, so why not? I never cared for most western games anyway

Well the Japanese console industry is declining and face it, Western gaming is far superior IMO. Better graphics and more polished gameplay mechanics.

Only if you like monotonous games that are too similar to each other. The western industry is not that superior

Current games: Everything on Switch

Switch Friend Code: SW-5075-7879-0008 | My Nintendo: LzWinky | Nintendo Network ID: LzWinky

This topic has been archived, no further posts can be added.