Other Gaming Forum

Topic: New Tomb Raider is an Xbox exclusive

Showing 21 to 40 of 148

AuthorMessage
LztheQuackAdmin

LztheQuack

21. Posted:

Dreamz wrote:

They complained that the original reboot, which was released on Xbox, PS, and PC didn't meet sales expectations, and now they're they're making the sequel an XBox exclusive? Square-Enix's upper management needs to be smacked a few times with the clue bat.

I really enjoyed the reboot, but if they don't want my money, oh well.

I think Jim Sterling's episode about Square Enix is pretty accurate. Just to warn you it's NSFW due to language and images: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/jimquisition/9617...

Nintendo Life Community Administrator

Fire Emblem! Enough said! TINGLE_loggery

Nintendo Network ID: LzWinky

AuthorMessage
CaviarMeths

CaviarMeths

22. Posted:

WaLzgi wrote:

A "dead" IP that sold at least one million? Wut?

Yes, it was a dead IP. The publisher wanted nothing to do with it.

I am your poorly translated JRPG.

AuthorMessage
LztheQuackAdmin

LztheQuack

23. Posted:

CaviarMeths wrote:

WaLzgi wrote:

A "dead" IP that sold at least one million? Wut?

Yes, it was a dead IP. The publisher wanted nothing to do with it.

The publisher was Sega. Sega also published Colonial Marines. Can we really trust their judgment?

Nintendo Life Community Administrator

Fire Emblem! Enough said! TINGLE_loggery

Nintendo Network ID: LzWinky

AuthorMessage
CaviarMeths

CaviarMeths

24. Posted:

WaLzgi wrote:

CaviarMeths wrote:

WaLzgi wrote:

A "dead" IP that sold at least one million? Wut?

Yes, it was a dead IP. The publisher wanted nothing to do with it.

The publisher was Sega. Sega also published Colonial Marines. Can we really trust their judgment?

I've never trusted Sega's judgment, but the point stands that without Nintendo's involvement, Bayo would still be buried under a pile of crappy Sonic games by now.

I am your poorly translated JRPG.

AuthorMessage
Tasuki

Tasuki

25. Posted:

I think this is funny to a point. All the Sony fanboys are up in arms at this yet when Square did the same thing to Nintendo with Final Fantasy 7 it was ok. The only thing I dont like about this is that Square isn't looking at the whole picture here and in fact any 3rd party company that does this isn't. How much money and support will they lose now from owners of the other consoles?

Push Square Moderator and all around retro gamer.

My Backlog

Nintendo Network ID: Tasuki311

AuthorMessage
LztheQuackAdmin

LztheQuack

26. Posted:

I wouldn't call it a dead IP then. They had a bad publisher.

Nintendo Life Community Administrator

Fire Emblem! Enough said! TINGLE_loggery

Nintendo Network ID: LzWinky

AuthorMessage
CaviarMeths

CaviarMeths

27. Posted:

Tasuki wrote:

I think this is funny to a point. All the Sony fanboys are up in arms at this yet when Square did the same thing to Nintendo with Final Fantasy 7 it was ok. The only thing I dont like about this is that Square isn't looking at the whole picture here and in fact any 3rd party company that does this isn't. How much money and support will they lose now from owners of the other consoles?

I thought about that too, but I think that was a good decision to Square to make as a company. Everyone was jumping on board with the PS because of CDs. It wasn't just that they had much higher storage capacity, but they were also much cheaper to produce and distribute.

Here though, I just don't know what SE is thinking. Tomb Raider sold much better on PS3/4 than on XB360/1. Why jump on board with the underdog? They may as well have made it a Wii U exclusive.

From a gaming perspective, the XB1 is looking much better than the PS4 right now (my opinion), but the sales numbers don't really back up this decision on SE's part.

Edited on by CaviarMeths

I am your poorly translated JRPG.

AuthorMessage
8BitSamurai

8BitSamurai

28. Posted:

Knux wrote:

Good thing that I despise the Tomb Raider series

My version

Currently retired indefinitely
Official "rare download" Assistant
Best YT show here!
Beat: Final Fight, Spec Ops TL, King of Dragons
Favorite games: Chrono Trigger, Final Fantasy VII, Symphony of the Night, Dragon Quest VIII, Tales of the Abyss

Nintendo Network ID: 8BitSamurai | Twitter:

AuthorMessage
TwilightAngel

TwilightAngel

29. Posted:

Well microsoft thinks by having this game on their,peoplewill have to buy an Xbox one,just to play this game.That's not going to happen though, some hardcore fans will buy the system to play it but the rest nah.

"Twilight Angel is indeed a male" Cyber-BLP--
"I said STOP the bus,not SHOOT it. Do those words sound the same? Stop. Shoot. STOP.SHOOT."Pagan Min
"The truth is Walker. You're here because you want to be something you're not. A hero.. So do you feel like one yet?" Konrad Spec Op's The Line

Nintendo Network ID: midnafanboy

AuthorMessage
shingi_70

shingi_70

30. Posted:

midnafanboy wrote:

Well microsoft thinks by having this game on their,peoplewill have to buy an Xbox one,just to play this game.That's not going to happen though, some hardcore fans will buy the system to play it but the rest nah.

That's not why the locked it up, they did to bolster thier line up and make their console look mre appealing. Its the same reason why we heard so much of the phrase console exclusive debut.

WAT!

Hey check out my awesome new youtube channel shingi70 where I update weekly on the latest gaming and comic news form a level headed perspective.

Nintendo Network ID: shingi70

AuthorMessage
Tasuki

Tasuki

31. Posted:

CaviarMeths wrote:

Here though, I just don't know what SE is thinking. Tomb Raider sold much better on PS3/4 than on XB360/1. Why jump on board with the underdog? They may as well have made it a Wii U exclusive.

They are thinking with their wallets that is what it is. It had nothing to do with who's top or underdog MS was willing to shell out the most money so that is who they went with. Plain and simple. Greed can overcome anything.

Push Square Moderator and all around retro gamer.

My Backlog

Nintendo Network ID: Tasuki311

AuthorMessage
TwilightAngel

TwilightAngel

32. Posted:

Is not going boost console sales cause, people think the game will come out for PC eventually. And in there mind why would buy a new system to play a game if the game is going to come out on PC in the upcoming years.But who knows it might now happen, and then the hardcore fans of series will have to buy the Xbox one just to play this game.

"Twilight Angel is indeed a male" Cyber-BLP--
"I said STOP the bus,not SHOOT it. Do those words sound the same? Stop. Shoot. STOP.SHOOT."Pagan Min
"The truth is Walker. You're here because you want to be something you're not. A hero.. So do you feel like one yet?" Konrad Spec Op's The Line

Nintendo Network ID: midnafanboy

AuthorMessage
BinaryFragger

BinaryFragger

33. Posted:

Although I think this decision will hurt the game's sales, it's a normal business transaction in the gaming world. They'res nothing unusual about a console maker flinging money at a publisher to get an exclusive (or timed-exclusive) game.

The reactions of Sony fanboys at other gaming sites are hysterical. Reminds me of 2008 when Final Fantasy XIII was confirmed for the Xbox 360.

BinaryFragger

Nintendo Network ID: binaryfragger

AuthorMessage
LztheQuackAdmin

LztheQuack

34. Posted:

BinaryFragger wrote:

Although I think this decision will hurt the game's sales, it's a normal business transaction in the gaming world. They'res nothing unusual about a console maker flinging money at a publisher to get an exclusive (or timed-exclusive) game.

The reactions of Sony fanboys at other gaming sites are hysterical. Reminds me of 2008 when Final Fantasy XIII was confirmed for the Xbox 360.

And that wasn't even exclusive

Nintendo Life Community Administrator

Fire Emblem! Enough said! TINGLE_loggery

Nintendo Network ID: LzWinky

AuthorMessage
Dave24

Dave24

35. Posted:

WaLzgi wrote:

You forgot to mention how Square Enix expects it to sell 10 million copies, then will be disappointed with everyone else when it doesn't reach that number

You forgot to mention that they are a company, you know, the thing that is there to make money. You also forgot that Tomb Raider costed 100 mln dollars, which looks ridiculous (and like a bad management of resources). So yeah, from the money perspective, 5 mln was an minimum to make it even/little profit.

But you are not the only one - most people forget about that or don't give 2 craps about how much development of something costed.

Dave24

AuthorMessage
LztheQuackAdmin

LztheQuack

36. Posted:

Dave24 wrote:

WaLzgi wrote:

You forgot to mention how Square Enix expects it to sell 10 million copies, then will be disappointed with everyone else when it doesn't reach that number

You forgot to mention that they are a company, you know, the thing that is there to make money. You also forgot that Tomb Raider costed 100 mln dollars, which looks ridiculous (and like a bad management of resources). So yeah, from the money perspective, 5 mln was an minimum to make it even/little profit.

But you are not the only one - most people forget about that or don't give 2 craps about how much development of something costed.

This argument doesn't really paint the company in a good light. Square Enix purposely poured so much money that it had to sell 5 million minimum?

Nintendo Life Community Administrator

Fire Emblem! Enough said! TINGLE_loggery

Nintendo Network ID: LzWinky

AuthorMessage
Peach64

Peach64

37. Posted:

Square will be well aware of the PS4 hardware figures compared to the Xbone hardware figures. MS's offer would have had to outweigh the loss of PS4 sales for them to do this.

Peach64

AuthorMessage
LztheQuackAdmin

LztheQuack

38. Posted:

I wonder if they poured just as much money into this exclusive. They know what they're doing, right?

Nintendo Life Community Administrator

Fire Emblem! Enough said! TINGLE_loggery

Nintendo Network ID: LzWinky

AuthorMessage
Jazzer94Staff

Jazzer94

39. Posted:

midnafanboy wrote:

Is not going boost console sales cause, people think the game will come out for PC eventually. And in there mind why would buy a new system to play a game if the game is going to come out on PC in the upcoming years.But who knows it might now happen, and then the hardcore fans of series will have to buy the Xbox one just to play this game.

It's more of a statement and increasing the lineup for MS then sales and it clearly worked PS fans are going mad at this.

PSN: mangaJman
SSBB FC: 1204-1132-2888
The Jazzloggery
Once you see you can never unsee Everyone's favorite videogame character
I keep getting this feeling that I should write something down here........................

Nintendo Network ID: Justinius94

AuthorMessage
Dave24

Dave24

40. Posted:

WaLzgi wrote:

Dave24 wrote:

WaLzgi wrote:

You forgot to mention how Square Enix expects it to sell 10 million copies, then will be disappointed with everyone else when it doesn't reach that number

You forgot to mention that they are a company, you know, the thing that is there to make money. You also forgot that Tomb Raider costed 100 mln dollars, which looks ridiculous (and like a bad management of resources). So yeah, from the money perspective, 5 mln was an minimum to make it even/little profit.

But you are not the only one - most people forget about that or don't give 2 craps about how much development of something costed.

This argument doesn't really paint the company in a good light. Square Enix purposely poured so much money that it had to sell 5 million minimum?

It doesn't. They're not evil or whatever because they want their money back with 5 mln sales. It's all about bad management and overconfidence in the power of the franchise. Without them, there would probably be no Tomb Raider or any other Eidos game (because at the time of the buy out, there were in pretty bad position).

It's all about being stupid with the money.

This exclusive won't cost as much - the engine is ready and the development time is much shorter (2-3 years instead of 5) and no takeover/buyout drama.

Dave24