Showing 21 to 26 of 26
21. Posted: Fri 26th Jun 2009 15:01 BST
That's a good way to think of it, CB.
22. Posted: Fri 26th Jun 2009 18:18 BST
Well, duh, yes.**Excludes games not worthy of a 9.
"Congratulations to Odnetnin for Most Disturbing Post 2009" - Adam
Six word TV reviews
The Worst Firework Displays of all Time
3DS Friend Code: 3093-7077-1059 | Twitter: Odnetnin
23. Posted: Sun 28th Jun 2009 07:39 BST
I guess you haven't met Corbie yet!
Dattebayo!FRIENDCODES:GAIAONLINE: user name: Naruto_Uzumaki_Tk07MYSPACE: www.myspace.com/bluefire9499TWITTER: @Tokool2007SMASH CODE: 3093 6747 0872WII CODE:4230 8755 5948 9133Ps3 user: E-ManTKMonster Hunter Tri: EmanTK
24. Posted: Sun 28th Jun 2009 07:42 BST
WolfRamHeart wrote:I guess you haven't met Corbie yet!Ha
So Far Yes on my reviews but i don't have any bad games being reviewed yet
Check out Wii-kly Review's on http://www.videogameheat.com PSN ID: TailsPrower86 3DS FC: 3695 0027 1349 Tails XBL GamerTag: BioReaver86
25. Posted: Tue 30th Jun 2009 21:59 BST
Usually I totally agree with NintendoLife's scores. There have been many 9's this year, but that's just because Nintendo has had a lot of great games this year. The one thing I will say about this site, though, is that I really think they need to do .5's as well. To me, there's a big difference between a 9 and a 9.5, or an 8.5 and a 9, and I think that their reviews could benifit from that. There's no reason to not do it.
3DS Friend Code: 2277-7231-5687
Now Playing: Animal Crossing: New Leaf
26. Posted: Tue 30th Jun 2009 22:03 BST
I think the scores are generally high, too, but I don't want a wider scale. Most people reading a review are going to round it, anyway. If I see a 9.2, I think 9. I don't think, man, this game is so much better than that 9 game, I better get it. People should just learn to ignore the score completely. Unless you don't trust their writing, there's no need to even look at the number. The score chart shows that they just mean things like "good" or "great," and you can easily pick up on that from the review.
Yeah, I agree with this. Like I said, I think incraments of .5 are good, but when you start giving out review scores like 9.75 things are getting a bit out of hand. It pisses me off when reviewers will give a game something like a 9.9 or an 8.9. Seriously, would it have killed you to round it up .1? But like you said, the most important thing is the actual written review, and the score reflects their reccomendation.