XyORIONyX

Scores/reviews are important considering there are a lot of games that cost a lot of money. I personally can't afford all of them and rely on reviews and scores to determine which games I want to dish money out for. I think one thing that would help each gaming website with reviews is having a basic criteria that each reviewer uses instead of posting their own opinions as an absolute. Ultimately most people use more than one source to make their decision anyway, so yes give scores on reviews.

11 years of ideas that will probably show up in upcoming games.

it doesn't ruin the future games though people will be annoying about characters being left out in the same way people complain when they don't get the new character they wanted. The fan base will remain the same especially when you factor in losing a few but also gaining a few.

has there ever been a bad guy in these games? like someone that was able to control certain monsters or is it always just dragons doing dragon things.

the fact that they are making this package at all scares me in terms of base price. It is seeming more like they are going to charge 60$ instead of 40$...really it should cost like 20$

what if I told you...Fortnite .. is an average game at best

When this game got announced I was hoping that it would be released on the switch, its just one of those games I'd love to have on the go. Once it was announced I wanted to see how it performed on the switch, now after seeing the videos of it and how it runs I am so excited for this. Will definitely pre-order. Vegeta>Goku

I'd much rather have a more unique character like Neku from TWEWY, or Crono, or somehow Sora.

People must also remember that for Smash 4 the single player cut scenes were all leaked which is the weird reason why they cut that out of the game. It is possible they are being so silent about single player is because they want it to generally be a surprise later on. The other option being that they were so butt hurt over the Smash 4 leaks that they really did cut out any single player story for any game going forward.

I can't really figure out why not having a single player ruins this game for so many people. The game was literally created to be a multiplayer game to fight against friends, it since then morphed into one of Nintendo's only "pro" games. I understand that having a little single player mode would be a nice added bonus but get real with yourselves about what this game is supposed to be. If your looking for a great involved single player game this is not that.

I don't know how you can hate on changes made to a franchise like this. Honestly I played melee for years and years and loved it, but really that game only has like 4 playable characters. Brawl was kind of a waste (accidental trips...) but Smash 4 to me was a pretty good balance, if Ultimate is inbetween melee and 4 then it's probably going to be the best mechanic wise. I'm pretty pumped.

I'm very interested in DAEMON X MACHINA especially after watching the trailer. I've always wanted a good mech game. Hope it ends up having a lot of customization and a good multiplayer.

I bought this game a few months ago, way before fortnite was announced for the switch (i hate that game anyway). This game to me looked like a great hybrid between games like fortnite and overwatch, seemed at the time to be the best multiplayer shooter option for the swtich. Hope its fun, looks good to me.

In whole I am very excited for this game, it's the perfect thing to bridge new, casual and core fans to the switch. Gamefreak will learn a lot from each fan base plus I'm sure they already have learned a lot about what the switch can do moving forward for Gen 8. They needed to see what they were working with. Even though I'm not a fan of not fighting a pokemon before catching, I am excited to see an updated Kanto.

This will definitely hold me over until the core game in 2019. A revamped Kanto has been long needed.

I've been playing this game since it first came out and from what I see I am excited. Obviously this is the bridge game to Gen 8. It allows them to try out so many things and gauge the reactions of both core fans and new. The graphics are a big step up and could definitely get way better for the next game. Only thing I'm not happy about is not battling the wild pokemon... However glad that after a decade they finally allow a pokemon to follow you again! Gamefreak gave us all a game to play on switch while we wait for them to finish Gen 8 and that's pretty cool.

I just started playing it last night. I find the game play very fun, and the controls are easy not "fiddly". It's a little easy (on normal) but it looks great and there is enough in the game to make it worth playing. Maybe 20$ is a little much, should probably be 15$ tops. I'd give it a higher score than a 6 though. I'd give this like a ....7.7

The move to remake/update the yellow version makes sense for Gamefreak. They have never worked on anything like the switch before and didn't know what they were dealing with so instead of making a bad GEN 8 game first they decided to remake yellow in a region they know very well. It will teach them a ton about the switch while at the same time touch the nostalgia of the world. It also gives them way more time to create new pokemon with better designs then we have been getting

I'd much rather have a fusion Star Fox game that was half RPG half flying shooter. Could be you have to go from planet to planet (for whatever reason) have to do puzzles and "temples" like adventures, but at the end of each planet you have to get into your F-wing and fly through the last bit and defeat a boss. Also you would use Falco as well as fox and slippy would be dead.