Given that many of retro gaming's most collectable items now sell for hundreds (and occasionally thousands) of dollars, it's unsurprisingly that enterprising companies are turning their hand to officially-licenced reprints to satisfy demand and make a quick buck in the process.
The latest example of this is Gleylancer, a super-rare Mega Drive shooter from 1992 that regularly fetches three-figure sums in its original form. Japanese firm Columbus Circle – which also creates its own clone hardware – inked a deal earlier this year with original rights holder Masaya to create a reproduction cartridge, pre-orders for which promptly sold out within days.
Gleylancer is now out in the wild, and, following the unexplained cancellation of our pre-order with the online retailer Play-Asia, we managed to get our hands on a copy – although it cost us a little more than its suggested retail price thanks to the fact that the game is already in high demand and is subsequently being up-sold by scalpers on auction sites and elsewhere. Gah.
It would seem that Columbus Circle, perhaps unsure about how such a niche release would perform, has only manufactured a very limited number of cartridges in this case. In hindsight, that seems like a foolish move, given the fame and scarcity of the original version, but it's easy to forgive a little caution when you consider the huge financial investment involved – even more so when you remember we're talking about a game from 1992 being re-released on a console no longer in production.
What's less forgivable is the fact that despite the high asking price, Columbus Circle has done a pretty shoddy job with this reproduction. The cover on our copy has several creases due to the fact that the plastic sleeve on the case isn't wide enough (we've seen other buyers comment on this also). The manual features poorly-scanned screenshots and doesn't appear to have been 'cut' properly during production, while the cartridge sticker on our version has a strange off-set printing issue (and the sticker itself wasn't fully stuck down on the back, which is again something we've seen other buyers report on). Finally, the circuit board isn't bevelled like it is on original Sega carts; while the thickness appears to be fine, the lack of a bevelled edge could potentially damage the cartridge contacts inside your console over time (although we can't say that for sure).
All in all, this is a slightly disappointing release, but quality control appears to be something that many companies working in this field struggle with, or choose to neglect. Back in 2017, Capcom gave iam8bit permission to produce a 25th anniversary Street Fighter II cart which, it turned out, could potentially set your SNES on fire – it even came with a warning stating as much. Likewise, Retroism's licenced reproduction of Super Double Dragon (called Return of Double Dragon) refused to work on very early SNES models. There's clearly an issue with quality control in this sector of the market; companies are perhaps spending most of their budget on securing the licences and then cutting corners when it comes to the physical product itself – which sort of defeats the object of reproducing a desirable and collectable item.
There are exceptions, of course – we've really liked Retro-Bit's line of reproduction games, which includes an insane R-Type III limited edition – but that feels like the exception. Until retro collectors vote with their wallets and avoid buying these shoddy products, we imagine this sorry trend is set to continue – especially as much of the demand is driven by enthusiasts who don't want to miss out on an item which could potentially grow in value, which is precisely what has happened with the Gleylancer reissue.
Comments 22
I have always thought of Gleylancer as a game with a speech-impediment - it just sounds wrong.
Is it weird that i have no clue what this is about yet I'm extremely interested anyway?
Seems like Reproduction Cartridges are a real gamble.
I once bougth a translated Mother 3 Repro, but everytime i used a specific Attack during Battles the Game crashed.
A few months later i got another one from a different seller and the difference in quality was really surprising. The built quality was much higher, it didn't use a battery for saving data and everything worked without a hitch.
Sounds like the same quality as one of those budget unlicensed Chinese repro carts, but with a license and a big ol' price tag to go with it.
I guess the answer to te question posed by the headline is, yeah, some are, some aren't.
I always find the repro cartridges interesting (for any console), but always wondered the quality. I remember hearing once that Nintendo's quality check on the Gameboy meant the game had to run on every version of it, including a very limited number in Japan that had a bug. Perhaps these companies can learn something from this.
The only reproduction carts I own are of MOTHER 1+2 and MOTHER 3, which I bought from an Etsy shop together for $30. They’re a little big, but they work perfectly. I think I’m going to avoid buying repro carts in the future unless it’s a fan translation of a non-English game, like the ones I mentioned before.
I’m staying clear of repros, even properly licensed ones. I got the retro bit brawlers pack for SNES and Piko’s 40 Winks for N64 and they just feel tacky and cheap. At least the Brawlers pack was quite cheap but 40 Winks wasn’t.
From now on I’ll either save up for real copies and be more selective, of be happy playing a game on an Everdrive or copied disk without owning anything physical.
I wonder if the LRG Nintendo ones will be any good.... the Star Wars ones... having bought quite a few special editions from then I’m assume they too will be cheap cost cut poor replica... the tat they include usually is
@Lordplops Greyrancer?!
@mazzel Greylancer - Gleylancer just makes me think of someone speaking with a mouth full of marbles. Or that thing you did when you were a kid and you put a finger in each side of your mouth, pulled your mouth apart, and then said 'My dad's a banker'.
@Lordplops I was kidding I knew you were thinking of Greylancer, but I wanted to keep the joke going
Hmmm..... I'm happy now that my preorder was canceled. Sorry for your copy being bad, Damien.
I wonder what the new limited run nes N64 and Gameboy carts will be like? I haven't ordered them but I wonder if they will learn from other companies mistakes. I don't think they've done repro carts before have they? I might be wrong
To be honest I buy a lot of repros from Aliexpress, buying the originals is becoming seriously expensive. Luckily I have a lot of original kit, but some games like Rendering Rangers which cost a fortune are cheap as chips on Alie.
I own the SF II, Super R Type and Double Dragon special editions and ALL WORK GREAT. I’ve played them on both an original SNES and the new Analogue SNES, and have no complaints. My favorite are the Super R Type and Double Dragon one as they look very good and feature games that are hard to find. I’ve played those two a bunch of times. SNES doesn’t feel hot, nothing seems off, but I do tend to play them mostly on the Analogue SNES.
You have to remember that the US is filled with lawyers and every product imaginable, as a result, has some sort of warning on it to avoid a lawsuit. The state I live in, California, was even going to mandate labels on coffee claiming it causes cancer, but a lawsuit and a bit of logic stopped it at the last minute. But I still see these warning labels of this product could do this, that or the other across most things I buy. Even the grocery store in CA has a warning before you walk in saying products sold here are known to cause cancer to the State of California.
Poor labels, shoddy craftsmanship and crap quality are one thing and that’s utter nonsense...but warning labels claiming fires, cancer, death, etc...on routinely safe products? We should use a little logic before freaking out, as to when something is labeled out of fear of being sued by sue happy lawyers and when something is truly dangerous.
Interesting little article. This market of gaming has exploded over the last few years and more and more fly by nights are being attracted by the smell of money. The herd will thin out soon enough as people will figure out which companies to trust.
This is the kind of game I use emulators for without being ashamed of it.
Repro carts are neat, even more so if they are sanctioned by the original developer, but if the quality is this shoddy it seems like a wasted effort to me. This isn't any better than those bootleg carts you find on ebay all the time...
Seems to be common in the hobby collection part of gaming. There's a lot of cash grabs these days.
Pretty disappointing that these companies can't even reproduce 20 year old carts that at least equal the build quality of the originals.
And this is exactly what I think about when I see the Star Wars games from Limited Run. Just a cash grab, just like the new films (in my eyes, don’t hate me)
I'm surprised an article with this headline is longer than the capitalized word "yes" followed by a period.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...