^ There's Citizens of Earth though that they did publish.
I'm ranting at this because if I say Nintendo is the king of gaming is bad but yet, praising a third party isn't a bad thing, then yeah, I wanna insult back.
@Socar Like Spoony pointed out, they didn't develop those games. If you publish a lot of other companies' games, you're bound to get a handful of mediocre titles over time.
The last less than stellar game they developed was Radiant Historia back in 2010, imo, and even that is beloved by many people with good taste.
@Ralizah except this game isn't fully developed by Atlus and is also collaborated by Nintendo as well.
Even so, Nintendo was the one that came up with the idea of this game to happen so thank them for doing so.
I smell a sense of third party fanboyism here. Praising Nintendo is bad but praising Atlus is good because of what? Third party logic?
Atlus was pretty much on their own here - Nintendo's involvement seemed to be limited to advisory and QA - the same story several other developers Ninty's worked with recently gave during their "co-development" cycles. It's an Atlus game. Heck, judging from some interviews and dev blogs I read last year, it sounds more like a particular Atlus dev team had kind of been left to their own devices for two full years until they finally started showing the new trailers, and they were...at least 60% done by then? Maybe 70%?
It's an Atlus game. Nintendo's just publishing.
Granted, Atlus' 3rd party publishing seems to be more of a US thing. The Japanese parent company mostly published its in-house games as far as I could find. Not to mention that "parent company" changed hands at least twice in the past 5 years, so that complicates things further. The point is that the guys who sit in their Tokyo office and make their games? They know what they're doing.
And for the record, the only majorly bad games they've ever produced were some license games, the newest of which was Battle B-Daman, of all things.
@Spoony_Tech@CanisWolfred Oh this is great. After beating Devil Survivor on the 3DS absolutely hating it and that I never want to play Shin Megami ever again, now you say that I don't give third parties a chance.
And again, you're wrong as Nintendo was the one that started the idea to begin with. They pitched it to Atlus at first but then Atlus mocked at Nintendo and said that they were not "enthusiastic" to make the game. It was only a year later that Atlus felt miserable about earlier and decided to make Shin Megami X Fire Emblem.
Wow....even for a game like this, credit isn't given to Nintendo at all. What's also sad is that this is more of a Shin Megami game than an actual crossover between Shin Megami X Fire Emblem.
EDIT: @artwark - Oh, wait...I get it now. I missed an obvious giveaway in the third paragraph. Now I feel dumb, that particular post is actually very....parse-able. The rest of my comment still stands, however.
I'm sorry, I just don't understand what your point is. I'll admit that it's my fault for jumping in midway and replying to the only part I felt I could add to. With that said, you do seem quite...passionate about something here. I just keep getting mixed messeges when I try to figure out what that is. I do think it might be easier to understand if you dail the passion down a bit, however. Just an honest suggestion.
@CanisWolfred The ONLY reason he's commenting here is because of Nintendo's involvement. Otherwise he could care less about this game.
Nintendo may have come up with the idea but beyond lending the Fire Emblem characters they did nothing which is why its 90% SMT and 10%Fire Emblem and that SMT really isn't 90% either as this just seems like a whole new game.
John 8:7 He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone.
MERG said:
If I was only ever able to have Monster Hunter and EO games in the future, I would be a happy man.
Forums
Topic: Tokyo Mirage Sessions ♯FE - OT
Posts 881 to 900 of 1,096
This topic has been archived, no further posts can be added.