Other Gaming Forum

Topic: Who is gonna get MAG??

Showing 41 to 52 of 52

AuthorMessage
Avatar

Flandy

41. Posted:

Chrono+Cross wrote:

Andy100003 wrote:

Should be called Lag :P

Oh snap! That was almost funny!

Thank you :D I think? :P

Been inactive forever. Not going to change the uber old sig
"bless you, corbie, for your unparalleled benevolence and truly generous nature!" -TBD Dec 31 2009

lz and Des the true love Story.| This Will be thread of the year.
My Backloggery | ChatRoom

AuthorMessage
Avatar

AlexSays

42. Posted:

Marvelousmoo wrote:

You guys are spoiled kids, who can't separate fun from good quality. The whole point of this game it to have large scale battles. You can't do that with 64 or less players. 256 people is a lot of players. Ive never even heard of a shooter that had 256 AI in one level. And why is lag such a bad thing. My friends and I used to pull out the worst quality shooter, star fox assault, and do so many crazy things on it just to get lag. Its crazy because everything is in slow motion and everybody ends up dying. Shooting games should be fun, not serious. People who play games really seriously don't have lives.

Actually, I won't be getting it, because of the fact that I am poor and can't afford a PS3.

And having a lot of players automatically makes it good quality?

I'm sure glad you're here to point out the quality for us spoiled kids.

AlexSays

AuthorMessage
Avatar

The_Fox

43. Posted:

Marvelousmoo wrote:

You guys are spoiled kids, who can't separate fun from good quality. The whole point of this game it to have large scale battles. You can't do that with 64 or less players. 256 people is a lot of players. Ive never even heard of a shooter that had 256 AI in one level. And why is lag such a bad thing. My friends and I used to pull out the worst quality shooter, star fox assault, and do so many crazy things on it just to get lag. Its crazy because everything is in slow motion and everybody ends up dying. Shooting games should be fun, not serious. People who play games really seriously don't have lives.

Actually, I won't be getting it, because of the fact that I am poor and can't afford a PS3.

Why is lag a bad thing? Maybe because it ruins the game? Missing sure shots and being unable to move properly due to the delay from input to execution might have been fun for you, but not the majority of people.

"The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."

-President John Adams

Treaty of Tripoly, article 11

AuthorMessage
Avatar

M00se

44. Posted:

and ive seen more lag in bad company then i have mag. a bc is only 24 players!

PSN ID: brucethemoose904
3DS FC: 3566-2025-1426
My Music: http://djm00se.bandcamp.com/
Previously known as: BB_Thrilla

AuthorMessage
Avatar

RandomWiiPlayer

45. Posted:

The Bad Company online isn't set up well, that is why. Even on Xbox Live it lags for Bad Company.

The Game.

Is it after 9PM EST? You should probably ignore the above post.

AuthorMessage
Avatar

M00se

46. Posted:

but xbox live is pretty laggy cause there are no dedicated servers, but its true the bc servers are really crappy!

PSN ID: brucethemoose904
3DS FC: 3566-2025-1426
My Music: http://djm00se.bandcamp.com/
Previously known as: BB_Thrilla

AuthorMessage
Avatar

RandomWiiPlayer

47. Posted:

BB+Thrilla wrote:

but xbox live is pretty laggy cause there are no dedicated servers, but its true the bc servers are really crappy!

Well I don't want to turn this into an argument, but I've never had a lag problem with anything but Bad Company on Live. Doesn't EA use its own servers? I know that they don't use Nintendo WFC for Wii games. I think that it is just EA.

The Game.

Is it after 9PM EST? You should probably ignore the above post.

AuthorMessage
Avatar

M00se

48. Posted:

RandomWiiPlayer wrote:

BB+Thrilla wrote:

but xbox live is pretty laggy cause there are no dedicated servers, but its true the bc servers are really crappy!

Well I don't want to turn this into an argument, but I've never had a lag problem with anything but Bad Company on Live. Doesn't EA use its own servers? I know that they don't use Nintendo WFC for Wii games. I think that it is just EA.

well i guess EA has a really bad server set up.

PSN ID: brucethemoose904
3DS FC: 3566-2025-1426
My Music: http://djm00se.bandcamp.com/
Previously known as: BB_Thrilla

AuthorMessage
Avatar

Digiki

49. Posted:

Marvelousmoo wrote:

You guys are spoiled kids, who can't separate fun from good quality. The whole point of this game it to have large scale battles. You can't do that with 64 or less players. 256 people is a lot of players. Ive never even heard of a shooter that had 256 AI in one level. And why is lag such a bad thing. My friends and I used to pull out the worst quality shooter, star fox assault, and do so many crazy things on it just to get lag. Its crazy because everything is in slow motion and everybody ends up dying. Shooting games should be fun, not serious. People who play games really seriously don't have lives.

Actually, I won't be getting it, because of the fact that I am poor and can't afford a PS3.

The most started out fine but quickly turned to worthless drivel.
256 different people is just excessive, that 64 you initially mentioned is still more than necessary. It shouldn't be commended just because no one's gone there before.

I don't know why you'd purposefully go out of your way to get lag. Sure it might be amusing for a bit, but the actual gameplay is much more enjoyable (and if not, surely a different game would be..). Star Fox Assault is fun though, tis a nice, shooter that one can easily pick up.

Then near the end we see some icky casual/scrub elitism, where you tell people how to play their games, and that playing to win and become skillful is wrong.

Digiki's Backloggery

AuthorMessage
Avatar

y2josh

50. Posted:

RandomWiiPlayer wrote:

BB+Thrilla wrote:

but xbox live is pretty laggy cause there are no dedicated servers, but its true the bc servers are really crappy!

Well I don't want to turn this into an argument, but I've never had a lag problem with anything but Bad Company on Live. Doesn't EA use its own servers? I know that they don't use Nintendo WFC for Wii games. I think that it is just EA.

EA does use its own servers. There servers aren't that great either, speaking from experience.

I plan to get this game if it gets good enough reviews, but I may not. If I get it, it's probably going to have to be a spur of the moment thing.

The word "Gem" is overused.
PSN/gamertag: jcturtle
3DS Friend Code: 3179-6118-9371

AuthorMessage
Avatar

Sylverstone

51. Posted:

Well, it does 256 players. :)
But I don't have a PS3, so you guys have fun getting wasted!

Sylver's Edge on YT | Sylver's Edge: The Developer's Journal | Follow me! | StreetPass NYC | Sylverloggery

"I always try to create new experiences that are fun to play." - Shigeru Miyamoto

3DS Friend Code: 1160-9715-1818 | Nintendo Network ID: Sylverstone14 | Twitter: Sylverstone14

AuthorMessage
Avatar

M00se

52. Posted:

i got it but havent played it yet. seems to be a good game. and some of those reviews are trashe. half of them are off of the beta which have two big differences!

PSN ID: brucethemoose904
3DS FC: 3566-2025-1426
My Music: http://djm00se.bandcamp.com/
Previously known as: BB_Thrilla