Bobby_earl

@nhSnork “public outlet data”. It’s a tweet. A tweet from a frustrated company butthurt over a few fans in social media. Hysterical.

Companies don’t scrub tweets for contradictory information unless it was misleading from conception. They didn’t want to. Now they do. If a company states “we have nothing to announce” then do, they don’t go and say “jk” to previous communication.

Fans were snarky. A company was snarky back. I know it’s “cool” for companies to be snarky, but this was unprofessional. The end.

And “thanks Nintendo” is for all of the money this company originally thought they wouldn’t get because they “don’t want to” XD.

[Lemon out]

@nhSnork ummm. What.

I re-read what you said 5 times and I still don’t know what that says.

At the end of the day, your original comment was how funny you thought their reply to the “haterz” were. A child says “cuz I don’t want to”. A professional company does not behave nor speak that way. You can call it opinion or perception, but it’s just the way it is. If the company wants to act that way, be my guest, but don’t deny that the tweeter was out of line regardless of who they were talking to. Sony doesn’t want cross play with fortnite cuz they don’t want to. It would be unprofessional for them to just simply state that and they received 100 times the backlash little Hat in Time received.

Their reply was unprofessional. Clearly because it’s deleted and they feel shame for it. Now, it’s coming out on switch and they’ll make bank. Thanks, Nintendo!

@nhSnork give in? I feel like you think I’m saying something I’m not actually saying.

A company’s said “cuz we don’t want to” and it reminded me of a child. It reminded me of Unprofessionalism. All I said was they should’ve either said nothing or said something more neutral. I never said they should give into fandom demands. How many companies have stated “we have no plans for switch at this time”? If any of those companies somehow can’t stay professional when people troll them over it, they need to hire someone who can.

@nhSnork nah. I only read articles. I dont spam devs accounts all butt hurt because a game isn’t coming out on the system. Saying “cuz we don’t want to!” is not even a stretch that it is unprofessional. A company should ignore baiting tweets and do what they want to do. Giving into it is just as childish as the original provoking comment itself.

@nhSnork holy five years ago, Batman!

Yah, they can say they don’t want to. I can also say it’s unprofessional. Clearly the link doesn’t work so they may have deleted it in agreement. Now they are, in fact, releasing it for the Switch. Cool.

And your reply about “triggers” and “entitlement” were clearly incorrect as a miracle happened and it’s comkng to Nintendo. “We have nothing to announce” or “we simply do not have the resources at this time” is one hundred times better than the tweet that got you all hot and bothered.

@nhSnork it’s the internet. If you have any type of presence there will be people that are hateful and will never be happy. It’s best to ignore it and not literally “clap back” when that can be taken as rude to people to said “why won’t it be on Switch” and they overall reply is “cuz we don’t wanna that’s why!”. Two wrongs don’t make a right and I don’t see anything funny or impressive about a reply that lumps haters with potential fans that waited for a Nintendo port and merely asked a question. They should’ve been more specific in their reaction. It wasn’t well thought out.

@nhSnork I sincerely thought you accidentally posted a tweet from an 8 year old. That didn’t want to clean it’s room or something. It’s unprofessional no matter what kind of replies they’re getting. I’m glad I waited for the Switch version that won’t exist at this point.

@krvstkvlt if a BMW dealership sold a car before release date and the driver got in trouble for instagramming the buy? You think the retailer shouldn’t be punished? They broke Nintendo’s agreement with them specifically.

@BLP_Software please re-read what I have stated. I can’t say it any clearer for you.

Your ToS copy paste does not reference pre-release content. It states ALL content. That obviously includes pre-released. What kind of world would it not?

By your ToS copy pastes, technically any content that someone streams who does not have specific permission is breaking ToS. Not just pre-release content but a 20 year old game from a defunct company. “Sorry. You broke ToS bye”.

He went to the store. He bought the game. He streamed it. Take the videos down. Ban him? When others are not banned because not ever streamer has expressed permission for every game in existence? And food for thought: why can I still watch the whole game on youtube? They aren’t banned. I just checked. The ending is still there.

It’s ridiculous.

@BLP_Software again. Your quote is regarding content. Not pre-released content. ALL content. Technically YouTube can do whatever they want with their TOS. You’re missing the point.

ANYONE can buy a video game at a store, stream it and get in trouble. You can’t even prove that every person who buys a copy before release date even knows the true release date in the first place. If you walk into Dum Dum games and buy a video game on the shelf and stream it. You can get in trouble.

Street date? Sorry, not everyone knows it. To be punished for buying a game legally then streaming it alone? Dumb.

@BLP_Software I read that. I don’t see where it states anything about pre-released games. That states no one can without permission. Including games already released.

Nintendo can take down the videos. But a 3 month ban? Justification?

The comments are a joke. He received his retail copy early. What YouTube rules did he break? Nintendo has every right to take down the videos but banning him for 3 months for going to a story and buying something? That’s not his fault.