When Nintendo unveiled the New Nintendo 2DS XL last week, it was somewhat surprising. The question many are grappling with is whether it's a sign of intent to take the 3DS into 2018 as a notable part of the market, or simply part of the strategy for a last hurrah to earn this financial year's target of shipping six million units of the portable.
When asked about 3DS sales and the nature of hardware lifecycles at an investor Q & A, Nintendo President Tatsumi Kimishima highlighted that the company remains flexible in its plans depending on sales and consumer demand. Talking of 3DS software successes in the last financial year - led by Pokémon Sun and Moon - it's explained that Nintendo will continue to react to current trends and the way the markets point. He also highlights that Nintendo's next moves in hardware are driven by consumer trends, which will set those anticipating a direct 3DS / 2DS successor into a spin.
With regards to our Nintendo 3DS business, our software sales figures in the last fiscal year were boosted significantly by titles, such as Pokémon titles, which helped increase hardware sales, and led to an overall year over year growth in sales of both hardware and software. And as discussed during our presentation, high demand for Nintendo 2DS is driven by an attractive price point on top of its hardware appeal. This is what gives Nintendo 2DS the largest growth rate out of the entirety of our Nintendo 3DS business.
We are planning to launch New Nintendo 2DS XL during this fiscal year. New Nintendo 2DS XL has screens that are the same large size as the New Nintendo 3DS XL, and can play more than 1000 Nintendo 3DS titles already released, at a very desirable price point. Our expectation is that if we are able to continue to provide enjoyable software, we will always meet the needs of consumers who want to continue playing on the existing Nintendo 3DS series. To that end, we are always thinking about what kinds of software consumers are going to want, and evaluating our hardware cycles to make sure that we are meeting that need.
This means that our product lifecycles are not going to last for a set number of years, but will be flexible enough to change when required by changing consumer needs.
In general, this is the sort of thinking we want to adopt for all our hardware development. We want to have flexible hardware cycles where the launch of new hardware sets off the development of the next hardware that will respond to consumer trends.
This isn't a new policy, of course. As the 3DS has maintained respectable numbers, albeit they were in decline until a Pokémon-led increase in the most recent financial year, Nintendo was quick to move on from the ailing Wii U; the home console was discontinued and replaced by the Switch after only a little more than four years on the market.
It'll be intriguing to see how long the 3DS remains a core part of Nintendo's plans and output. The portable's role into 2018 will likely depend on the success or otherwise of the New 2DS XL and key game releases this year, while only Nintendo knows how many medium to long-term titles are in the works for the handheld.
[source nintendo.co.jp]
Comments 74
I heard a Rumour about Remake of Pokemon Pearl & Diamond for 3DS.
Hm....
Nintendo seems to be releasing more hardware variations than Switch games these days. Fill the bloody dam first!
I love me 3ds and proclaimed it my favorite system of all time........NOW KILL IT!! For the sake of the Switch, KILL IT!!
This will be a lazy excuse to keep churning out Pokemon and Monster Hunter on the 3ds and I don't want to see that happen. We need and deserve Switch versions.
@Spoony_Tech : I've said it before, I don't mind Nintendo supporting the 3DS. But please, PLEASE port all current/future 3DS games to Switch as well! I don't want/need to carry around an XL and an XXL portable device with me everywhere.
I suppose Nintendo wants to milk the 3DS cow till it's a corpse, but unlike the Wii U, third party developers are still supporting the 3DS to this day.
@sillygostly I don't want a simple port. I want a proper Switch version and then let the 3ds have a dumbed down version. Kinda what they did with most of the Wii U to 3ds games.
3DS needs some Unique games from 3rd parties like on NDS before discontinued. Well, as long not a Typical Crappy smartphone games.
@Spoony_Tech
Imagine Animal Crossing New Leaf Remake on Switch...
I think many here were angry that Nintendo is still supporting 3DS, mainly because they sold their 3DS after buying Switch... 🤣
@Nintendian I think you might be right. It'll take me a few more months to buy the Switch, but I'll never sell my N3DS
I'm still scratching my head about why we need "New" 2DS systems at this point? Others have already pointed out their worries about the Switch not seeing games because the developers are still designing games for the 3DS when they should be concentrating on the Switch....and I agree.
However, I also question the PR statements made recently in response to the discontinuation of the NES Classic. How can you say that the manufacturing of the NES Classic is taking up too many company resources but then decide to manufacture a "new" 2DS???? Maybe I'm missing something? They also want to brag that they sold over 2 million Classics! How can you screw your fans by stopping production on a popular product so that millions can't find them but then produce a product that no one was asking for?
I think I'd rather have cross-play become more of a thing. That would really drive the want for Switch. That way, you can have your 3DS titles on the TV.
I'm sick of looking at pixels. The Switch is gorgeous and the only games I'll even consider buying are main series Pokémon titles ie Stars or DPP remakes (assuming Stars isn't that remake). Or possibly tiny eShop games I haven't gotten around to purchasing such as the Box Boy sequels. Nintendo should be putting all their eggs into the Switch basket if they want to see consumer interest remain piqued
@sillygostly Pretty sure one doesn't have any effect on the other. This is also the first 3DS hardware iteration since 2015.
@foodmetaphors then this console and future 3DS games aren't for you, but there are millions more to make in profit for Nintendo, not to mention its a win for the consumer base. Not everyone wants to throw down the money for a Switch right away. Nearly every video game producer has continued to put out simpler/cheaper variations of their old consoles to bring in the frugal gamer/poorer parents wanting to get their kids consoles and games. For at least two more years I expect more content to be pumped out to the 3DS line because less financially well off gamers will pick it up and people who simply love their 3DS and don't want to miss any fun games.
Let them have their Megaman 6, Startropics 2, Donkey Kong Country 3, and other games that were released during the dawn of a new console. The Switch will survive and Nintendo will have bigger profits. Everyone's happy.
@dkxcalibur Missing the point. The NES classic was a stopgap, that made Nintendo around 20 bucks per console sold. The 2DS XL is gonna net the company around 50 dollars. Do the math.
Still, yes, I feel that they betrayed Nintendo fans, not because they discontinued, but because Regis said earlier that they will meet demand.
Did you notice if New 2DS XL cartridge + Micro SD card slot cover was adopted from Switch design ?
I think New 2DS XL is like a Transition from 3DS games to Switch games. 3DS will slowly not supported anymore. Switch will be Main Priority by the time 3DS has been continued.
I don't feel like resources put into 3DS software is hampering development of switch software. The more the merrier! We still have lots to get localised too - some great looking Atlus titles like Etrian Odyssey V, for example
@Spennymoor You might not "feel" like that but if those resources/developers weren't developing for 3DS, they would be developing for Switch. In other words Switch would have to benefit no?
So is this like the Wii where Ubisoft is still releasing Just Dance on there up to this day?
Yeah yeah the 3DS is great and all but CAN YOU PLEASE kill the damn thing already? It's 6 years old, it had a great run. If the 3DS stopped production (...of games) last year the Switch would've had a much better catalog.
The entire point of the switch was not having to struggle making games for a portable AND a home console. FFS Nintendo.
I think the 3DS (now, 2DS) fills an important role in the Nintendo ecosystem. No longer is this the first game console/handheld a kid will play with...that is now Mom's phone, which Nintendo acknowledges. But, if you want to hook the kid on real games with a real controller, the 3DS/2DS is the system.
The fact that Nintendo seems to be giving up on "gimmicky" things that drive up costs that 3rd party's don't know how to use properly or aren't going to port games to take advantage of, is going to be beneficial in the long run.
Until the Switch is under $200 and fits in my pocket, it will NEVER be a replacement for my 3ds. That's just it.
@maceng I'm not sure I'm missing the point. I'm going by recent statement: "We understand that some people were frustrated about not being able to find the system, but for us, we need to make sure we manage all of our resources in an effective way."
Also, is there not a much larger risk with a $150 system versus a $60 system? If you told me that I could make $20 off of a $60 unit or $50 off of a $150 product, I would go with the low risk option. Plus the percentage of profit per unit is about the same! All I know is that there are way way way more people looking to buy the Classic then there are people buying the "new" 2DS. I think it's dumb. Who are they marketing this towards? Don't say families or people with lower incomes! Those markets are still going to look at the original 2DS at almost half the price. As a father of 2 young gamers, I wouldn't even consider this system even if they didn't already own 3DS family systems already.
To me this is sort of a "final" DS...XL screens and "new" processor without the 3D no one seems to care about anymore, with a price point to suit. If you bought this, there's a large used physical game market and a vast eshop. Pretty good portable if you are wanting to pay less than the fledgling Switch line, and Nintendo can make a few dollars as they phase out DS development.
@datamonkey I get what you're saying, but localisation is an easy win, and most of the recently announced games (hey pikmin, Kirby action game, fire emblem echoes etc.) apear to be quick turnaround projects using existing engines built for the specific 2-screen setup and resolution specs of the 3DS. Doubt we will see anything as resource intensive as Super Mario 3D Land/Kid Icarus Uprising again on 3DS. I'm very happy these new games exist as I love 3DS and the games they are building on. I also have a tonne to play on switch with more coming out every month. For me it's a great situation. I have no doubt each of these developers (possible exception of Arzest), is also hard at work on Switch titles that make use of the specific hardware there. The nature of these games (existing engines/assets) likely allows them to do that. It's a win-win!
@Alikan frugal people already had/have options, the original 2DS is about half the cost while the immensely more pocketable n3DS is only $20 more. If they had gotten the price to $130 it would make a lot more sense in my mind.
Haha, them kids matching the colors on their systems. Wearing their caps and pumps inside on mom's nice carpet. What an ordinary moment made exciting through the presence of Nintendo branded video games!
@BensonUii Look I know you're right but I've got a bad feeling about both the games I mentioned. I can see them skipping another go around to launch new games on the 3ds.
It's ok and perfectly safe. Next hardware revision will be for the Nintendo Switch.
@Spoony_Tech Actually, Monster Hunter would have to be "dumbed down" for Switch too anyways, seeing as it's not as powerful as a PS4, or other consoles. And honestly, despite not being the most graphically powerful system, the 3DS still provides games that are just as good as any console game.
@Spoony_Tech I somewhat agree. I understand them wanting to milk the 3DS, and as long as there's strong demand for it, it doesn't really make sense to kill it. But are they doing it with a Switch strategy in mind or just blindly running in reactionary mode (Kimishima sure likes the word 'react' which doesn't sound very executive...but it's also refreshing), and just look at that image above: 3DS is a cheap toy for kids. Switch is a premium device for adults. I'm fine with that. That's a good market segmentation. Heck, that might be the best thing Nintendo could do long-term. They need to shed the "Nintendo is the kiddie console" image, and they've needed that for 20 years. Dragging 3DS along forever and positioning it as "yep we DO make a kiddie console called 2DS, but adults will want Switch." might help them long term.
BUT this focus on producing software for 3DS because the audience is there does put Switch adopters in an odd position for a while. And it puts people that love Nintendo games at an impasse since we have our shiny new Switch but are told to go play 3DS instead because the games are there.
The overall strategy is a good one, but they really need to work out TIMING and messaging. Because they need to stop mixing their signals (MK8D launch day & Switch restock day was possibly not a good day to announce a new 3DS model...)
Well it makes sense to support guaranteed money while the Switch builds up steam. However there aren't many new 3ds games in the Japanese pipeline. Half of what the west is getting this year is leftovers from previous Japanese titles. So I really don't give the 3ds family more than a year and a half at most. I think Nintendo will make them for at least two more years however.
@Beau_Skunk Have they announced the next Monster Hunter game? I would think that a Monster Hunter game developed specifically for the Switch would be a step up from their most recent titles.
@dkxcalibur They've not announced the next MH. They've also said they're working on a "major IP" for Switch.
Gee, that's a real puzzle there.
Don't be fooled.
If the 3ds were progressing strongly into the future, they'd be ADDING bells and whistles, not REMOVING them.
removing features is always a telltale sign of decline in video games.
Honestly, the 2DS XL is basically a lot like the DSi XL, GBA Micro, and Wii Mini. Final hardware refreshes at the tail end of a console cycle, while not necessarily needed, were released to spur and capitalize on some final sales in the last year or so of a system's life. 3DS support has already slowed some, but the major sales of Pokemon Sun and Moon have given the system a shot in the arm not to mention Nintendo can continue to release and expand the library of $20 Nintendo Select titles to transition the 3DS into more or a budget system as time goes on not to mention continued EShop and VC support.
If it's still making Nintendo money and there is interest in the platform, it'd be silly for Nintendo to completely ignore 60+ million people who have already bought a 3DS since 2011. When it's all said and done, while it won't reach the height of the original DS which caught the pre-smart phone era of portable casual gaming, there's no reason 3DS won't sell around the 80 million or so the GBA did which are still pretty respectable numbers, especially for a portable gaming system in the era of tablets and smart phones.
@Anti-Matter The evidence actually points to a Switch remake because of gamefreak hiring people who have experience with 3DS and Switch.
@ParasolStars I think this is what is going on. Well said.
New 2DS means no 3D but using the new processor = looks better and faster.
This way all the games made for New 2DS from now on can be ported to Switch in the future.
Nintendo has got all this figured out, as always they want to re-sell their games over and over.
@datamonkey That's the issue though, would they all be developing for Switch if the 3DS was dead? (Or even most of them?)
So far the 3DS has a lot of users, and the Switch has potential, but not the installbase yet, with production seemingly bottlenecking its growth.
Developers are understandably going for the more certain bet, and it makes sense for Nintendo to keep supporting 3DS for a while longer, pulling the 3DS "rug" out from under developers and slower adopters too soon might make them wary of Nintendo in the future...
There's a time for ending the 3DS, but it's not now yet, first get the Switch on its feet and freely available, then let the 3DS fade away.
@ParasolStars Not bad for a machine that the analysts, media, and commenters declared DoA due to tablets and phones (and Vita, LOL) back in Feb 2011.
@Beau_Skunk Since Monster Hunter has never made an appearance on the Ps4 that won't be a problem.
The 3DS is an easy and very profitable money maker with a ton of even more profitable legacy software that Nintendo can sell.
Nintendo will keep the 3DS around until the Switch alone can sustain the company's profits and revenues, which would require the Switch to attain a much larger install base for Nintendo to exploit. Nintenso also needs to lower production costs of the Switch to increase their margins, since the Switch hardware is currently nowhere near as profitbale as the 3DS/2DS hardware.
@micronean By what logic are they removing any bells and whistles? They already previously offered the 2DS, and this is only ADDING all the "New" upgrades to it. You're kidding yourselves if you don't think Nintendo's going to keep the 3DS alive as long as possible. Switch will replace it eventually, but they're not going to immediately abandon it like with Wii U-- 3DS still sells and has enough features that Switch doesn't to merit keeping it around. Mark my words, it'll still be around all throughout 2018, and I wouldn't be shocked if lasts well into 2019.
@foodmetaphors maybe, but thinking a game company should instantly stop supporting its older platforms is just bad business.
Just scanning through the comments section, must be the 'stupidist' bunch of fanboys around....'Kill the 3DS'...Like,
serious dudes? Why??? Because you bought a Switch?
3rd party developers and publishers choose systems based on demographics, market, projected profits. Killing 3DS will not automatically mean more Switch games....
Grow up FFS!!! 😁 😁 😁
@dkxcalibur You know the other "gaming" company that produces a myriad of products but prefers selling and pushing their high-en (more profitable) stuff? Apple.
At one point there was a breakdown on costs of the iPad2, I think, and they were selling at 500, but the cost to produce them was less than half of that. Why not sell it at 400 and reach a wider audience? Because they prefer selling 20MM at a 250 bucks profit (5 billion dollars) than just selling 30MM at a 150 dollars profit (4.5 billion profit).
The 3DS still selling upwards 5 million a year with a very tidy profit (the cost like 200 bucks 6 years ago to make), They are probably costing 80-90 bucks at max. (profit is 60-70 dollars).
I wish that they could still be making the NES classic. I have 2 but I wanted 4-5 to keep around just in case.
@maceng I question how many of the 5 million systems are 2DS systems? Again, who are they marketing? The potential market for the Classic versus this new 2DS is larger. I would bet that Nintendo will not sell 2 million "New" 2DS systems the rest of the year. But I would bet that Nintendo could easily sell another 2-3 million Classics.
I'm not saying to kill the 3DS, I'm just questioning this new version when they're cutting other products because they need to manage their resources. That's all. If they could do them all I wouldn't care. But I know many local people who were disappointed because they couldn't find a Classic. I don't know a single person who is excited for the "new" 2DS.
"Killing the 3DS" would be an absurd move. It's a more affordable option for those that can't afford a Switch (or don't want one) with a steady stream of games yet to be released. Not only that but the production costs for Nintendo to make 3DS games are likely only a fraction of the cost of producing a top tier Switch game.
If it's selling = continue to release games;
If it's not = move on to the next hardware.
Pretty simple, isn't it? The Wii U went into the worst way, then they gave us the Switch. So I guess they'll milk the 3DS until the consumers stop to support it, because there's no reason to stop making 3DS games right now
I think its a good idea, because people who haven't upgraded to a new 3ds yet will have a more affordable option now. Also, maybe there will be a big game that requires the new 3ds. Perhaps Pokemon Stars, or whatever it will be, since Sun and Moon pushed my old 3ds really hard.
How many times do we have to go over this? The 3DS WILL be replaced by the Switch in due time. Right now is not that time.
Nintendo's 1st party games on 3DS lately have been low budget, low effort projects made by external devs. It's blatantly clear that they've scaled back development for 3DS significantly and are focusing on Switch.
Yes, we'll have Mario & Luigi Superstar Saga DX, Pokemon Stars, and Kirby this fall on 3DS. I strongly doubt anything of note, if at all, will come out of Nintendo for 3DS in 2018. There are, however, plenty of 3rd party localizations to spread throughout 2018, and they will do that.
Chill out people.
And yes, I fully expect Pokemon Stars to be a 3DS exclusive game. I hope it's on Switch as well, but I doubt it. We'll find out soon though, as May is always a big time for Pokemon announcements.
Game Freak finishing out generation 7 on the 3DS should come as a surprise to no one. Gen 8 will be on Switch.
This only brings one question: Why they didn't do the same with the NES MINI?
@Jessica286 I'm guessing Nintendo thinks it can get much more value out of their old IP than they were from the NES mini.
I think dead simple NES mini hacking and ROM sharing had the potential of sucking the value right out of them over time, but it might have been margins after each ROM owner got its cut or other issues.
@Spoony_Tech I agree!!!
don't kill the 3DS yet! it would be crazy of Nintendo to do so right now, plus I still plan to keep using it and buying games for it for a long time to come, and imagine many others do to. Not interested in Switch at all right now.
2DS XL doesn't appeal to me though, prefer to play with 3D so will no doubt pick up a 3DS XL as backup soon.
At the expense of banging the drum - the 3DS has an install base of nearly 70 million strong. To put those numbers into context - it matches the PSP, a system that had steady support in Japan until 2014; three years after the Japanese launch of the PS Vita, a system still receiving support from a small, loyal install base and third-party developers, no matter how much Sony proper seems to be avoiding mentioning it by name, lest doing so bring a curse upon them.
To completely abandon the system at this stage in the game would be, frankly, leaving money on the table - particularly if cross-generation titles with the Switch (Fire Emblem Warriors) and lower-budget family-friendly titles (Pikmin, M&L remaster, Kirby) are both cheap and easy to develop; or can be given out to second-and-third party partners.
People worried that their investment in the Switch will somehow go badly, and that's fair, given what happened with the Wii U; need only look at the kind of support the 3DS is still receiving from Nintendo to realise that, for one, the lion's share of Nintendo's first-party, big budget developers and resources are, indeed, going to Switch exclusive titles... which makes sense, it's a $300 product for more serious gamers who want the biggest, best titles from the company... as opposed to a $150 product for those who just want a Pokémon/Mario/Zelda (remember the 3DS has three top-quality Zelda titles, four if you count Tri-Force heroes!) machine to tide them over.
Nintendo are talking big about this support right now, however, because they -need- this segment of the market, they are the only company in it; and they want to convert that segment upwards into their more expensive all-in-one hybrid system in due time without them feeling "forced" into it; which is a difficult sell at the best of times.
I love the 3DS, but please devote all resources to developing Switch games. We need Pokemon and Monster Hunter there more than on 3DS.
The people that sold their 3DS are crazy,who would sell the only console with portable Super Smash Bros?I'm going to keep mine at least until Switch has a a port of the Wii U version,but a brand new game would be better since I dont really want to buy Smash 4 a third time.
@Nintendian Absolutely. I learned a long time ago to never sell hardware (or games).
@NEStalgia
We get it: you want the 3ds read and buried. You are a grown up, with sophisticated taste whilst we 3ds owners are kiddies. Funny being called a kiddy when I'm grandma. Ah, but that makes me one of those little old ladies who walk into Wal-Mart and buy the kids the wrong game because I don't understand it all. Too old to know the WiiU wasn't an addition to the Wii etc.
I've been gaming since freaking Pong. Haven't moved to the NS because I've got Zelda for the WiiU. Between that, my PS3 and my N3ds I'm happy for now.
Ninty's gonna do what ninty does. No amount of pissing n moaning on our part will change that. But please stop insulting those who choose to play differently than you with pseudo babble about kiddy vs adult stuff.
Rant over. Peace.
@fiben1002 Amen to that.
@k8sMum I think you're missing some context. I love the 3DS. I have 4 of them Launch day, XL launch day, and 2 NXL launch day. It's the only system to surpass the SNES as my all time favorite which I never thought any system could do, and it has most of my play time for the past gen, surpassing my PS4 and WiiU in total hours played.
However, in the past 8 weeks, Switch has already replaced it as my favorite console of all time and it draws me to want to play on nothing else. Basically the Switch is a 4DS that has a WiiU inside...what's not to love? Everything the 3DS does the Switch does as well or better, except for stereoscopic 3D and being pocketable. I DO miss stereoscopic 3D and wish Switch had it. But the point is it's such a nice machine I find myself resisting picking up my 3DS which just 9 weeks ago was my favorite all time console.
But I'm getting sidetracked. The point about the "kiddie console" isn't me bashing the 3DS. My point was that both Reggie and Kimishima have discussed 3DS's current position next to Switch as being a great (quoting reggie) "entry point to console gaming" and "perfect for kids". Kimishima echoed the statement in different wording. Meanwhile the 2DS platform has been all about kids from the beginning, it was expressly said so and the earrly advertising was all about being kid friendly particularly without 3D. So we have the New 2DS that is the extension of the intentionally ruggedized, kid-friendly 2DS line, and a member of the 3DS line that all wings of Nintendo leadership have made clear is now being retargeted as a value product aimed at kids. Reggie even mentioned about "growing into" a Switch. And we look at the above advertising and all New 2DS XL related advertising so far, and it's heavily geared toward kids.
That's not me, that's Nintendo intentionally segmenting the market along those lines. My point was that's not such a bad thing, as Nintendo overall has been plagued as the "kiddie console" brand since the Sega "Nintendon't" ads, and especially since Sony's rise. Segmenting one platform as a kid oriented product might help get the Switch less associated as the "kiddie console" which would be a good thing in the long run.
😂😂😂 all these salty Switch owners in here are cracking me up
Others said this but 2DSXL is like gba micro and dsixl.....just a late run. Ppl should not be too upset or worried about development in that Nintend isnt putting thayt much in as withthe crazy big library already driving sales.
Purely 2DS was a kids system and xl is a final hurrah. They need a cheaper option for 'entry' level gamers. The clamshell design really is superior for portables so why not a 2DS in tha format. I am quite sure the 3DS will not have an evolved sucessor. Much more likely we get a SwitchGo next. Switch is a more powerful portable so what would a 4ds do better than Switch? Ultimately I like Nintendo at 2 price points because Switch is a bit much for kids to handle on their own.
@IceClimbers
I trust Eurogamer enough to believe that Pokémon Stars will be on the Switch in some form - either as a Switch exclusive or a multiplatform game on both Switch and 3DS.
I think the switch is a junky tablet wannabe, but that being said, the 3ds is a superb system. I'm amazed it's still doing so well given the fact they rarely release games for it anymore. I hope that these continued reports of its success as of late will inspire developers to put more games on it especially in light of the new 2DS XL release this summer. We are really desperately in need of a large variety of new games, most importantly casual games such as Puyo Puyo Tetris, Teddy Together, or other similar titles that North America has never gotten for the 3DS.
People are making a lot of fuss over 3DS game development taking away from work for the Switch. While that might be the case to a small degree... quite a few of the 3DS development skills won't be directly translatable.
Nintendo could also be retraining older 3DS developers to work on the Switch while they work on the last generation of 3DS games. There is no point suddenly stopping 3DS development as many of the staff will have nothing to do for a good while.
@CheezIt That's your personal opinion, it's important to note that the 3DS got a lot of hate when it first launched for being an over-priced gimmick riding on the coat tails of the NDS. If Nintendo stopped making a console just because a few people don't like it... the 3DS wouldn't have lasted long after launch.
I absolutely love my 3DS and even managed to forgive Nintendo for cutting the price by nearly £80 a month or so after I bought one at launch (and yes, I did get the £5 worth of virtual console filler as an apology).
It's easy to take pot shots at the Switch, but doing so while forgetting that the handhelds & consoles we love now are/were not perfect when they launched is a little silly in my opinion.
I think the 'New 3DS' could continue into 2019 if developers were willing to stop supporting the original model....
@aaronsullivan in other words they are being way too greedy. They are slowly becoming the EA of Japan.
@Jessica286 That's reductive to the point that it doesn't resemble what I said, but whatever makes you feel better I guess?
Nintendo has pretty consistently aimed to be profitable with the only business it is in. If that's too greedy for your taste, it's too greedy. Kinda how most business works, though.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...